skip to main content
10.1145/2600428.2609494acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Hashing with List-Wise learning to rank

Published:03 July 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Hashing techniques have been extensively investigated to boost similarity search for large-scale high-dimensional data. Most of the existing approaches formulate the their objective as a pair-wise similarity-preserving problem. In this paper, we consider the hashing problem from the perspective of optimizing a list-wise learning to rank problem and propose an approach called List-Wise supervised Hashing (LWH). In LWH, the hash functions are optimized by employing structural SVM in order to explicitly minimize the ranking loss of the whole list-wise permutations instead of merely the point-wise or pair-wise supervision. We evaluate the performance of LWH on two real-world data sets. Experimental results demonstrate that our method obtains a significant improvement over the state-of-the-art hashing approaches due to both structural large margin and list-wise ranking pursuing in a supervised manner.

References

  1. A. Andoni and P. Indyk. Near-optimal hashing algorithms for approximate nearest neighbor in high dimensions. In FOCS, pages 459--468, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. S. Chakrabarti, R. Khanna, U. Sawant, and C. Bhattacharyya. Structured learning for non-smooth ranking losses. In SIGKDD, pages 88--96, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. T. Joachims, T. Finley, and C.-N. J. Yu. Cutting-plane training of structural svms. Machine Learning, 77(1):27--59, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. B. Kulis and K. Grauman. Kernelized locality-sensitive hashing for scalable image search. In ICCV, pages 2130--2137, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. W. Liu, J. Wang, S. Kumar, and S. Chang. Hashing with graphs. In ICML, pages 1--8, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. M. Norouzi, D. Fleet, and R. Salakhutdinov. Hamming distance metric learning. In NIPS, pages 1070--1078, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. S. Shalev-Shwartz, Y. Singer, N. Srebro, and A. Cotter. Pegasos: Primal estimated sub-gradient solver for svm. Mathematical Programming, 127(1):3--30, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. I. Tsochantaridis, T. Joachims, T. Hofmann, and Y. Altun. Large margin methods for structured and interdependent output variables. In JMLR, pages 1453--1484, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. J. Wang, S. Kumar, and S. Chang. Semi-supervised hashing for scalable image retrieval. In CVPR, pages 3424--3431, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. J. Wang, W. Liu, A. Sun, and Y. Jiang. Learning hash codes with listwise supervision. In ICCV, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Y. Weiss, A. Torralba, and R. Fergus. Spectral hashing. In NIPS, pages 1753--1760, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Y. Yue, T. Finley, F. Radlinski, and T. Joachims. A support vector method for optimizing average precision. In SIGIR, pages 271--278, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Hashing with List-Wise learning to rank

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGIR '14: Proceedings of the 37th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research & development in information retrieval
      July 2014
      1330 pages
      ISBN:9781450322577
      DOI:10.1145/2600428

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 3 July 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • poster

      Acceptance Rates

      SIGIR '14 Paper Acceptance Rate82of387submissions,21%Overall Acceptance Rate792of3,983submissions,20%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader