skip to main content
10.1145/2600428.2609580acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Who is the barbecue king of texas?: a geo-spatial approach to finding local experts on twitter

Published:03 July 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper addresses the problem of identifying local experts in social media systems like Twitter. Local experts -- in contrast to general topic experts -- have specialized knowledge focused around a particular location, and are important for many applications including answering local information needs and interacting with community experts. And yet identifying these experts is difficult. Hence in this paper, we propose a geo-spatial-driven approach for identifying local experts that leverages the fine-grained GPS coordinates of millions of Twitter users. We propose a local expertise framework that integrates both users' topical expertise and their local authority. Concretely, we estimate a user's local authority via a novel spatial proximity expertise approach that leverages over 15 million geo-tagged Twitter lists. We estimate a user's topical expertise based on expertise propagation over 600 million geo-tagged social connections on Twitter. We evaluate the proposed approach across 56 queries coupled with over 11,000 individual judgments from Amazon Mechanical Turk. We find significant improvement over both general (non-local) expert approaches and comparable local expert finding approaches.

References

  1. J. Antin, M. de Sa, and E. F. Churchill. Local experts and online review sites. In CSCW 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. L. Backstrom, E. Sun, and C. Marlow. Find me if you can: improving geographical prediction with social and spatial proximity. In WWW 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. K. Balog, L. Azzopardi, and M. De Rijke. Formal models for expert finding in enterprise corpora. In SIGIR 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. T. Brants. Inter-annotator agreement for a german newspaper corpus. In Proceeding of the 2nd International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. C. S. Campbell, P. P. Maglio, A. Cozzi, and B. Dom. Expertise identification using email communications. In CIKM 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Z. Cheng, J. Caverlee, H. Barthwal, and V. Bachani. Finding local experts on twitter. In WWW 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Z. Cheng, J. Caverlee, and K. Lee. You are where you tweet: a content-based approach to geo-locating twitter users. In CIKM 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. E. H. Chi. Who knows?: searching for expertise on the social web: technical perspective. Commun. ACM, 55(4), Apr. 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. H. Cramer, M. Rost, and L. E. Holmquist. Performing a check-in: emerging practices, norms and'conflicts' in location-sharing using foursquare. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, MobileHCI '11, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. J. L. Fleiss, J. Cohen, and B. Everitt. Large sample standard errors of kappa and weighted kappa. Psychological Bulletin, 72(5), 1969.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. S. Ghosh, N. Sharma, F. Benevenuto, N. Ganguly, and K. Gummadi. Cognos: crowdsourcing search for topic experts in microblogs. In SIGIR 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. T. H. Haveliwala. Topic-sensitive pagerank. In WWW 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. B. Hecht, L. Hong, B. Suh, and E. H. Chi. Tweets from justin bieber's heart: the dynamics of the location field in user profiles. In SIGCHI 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. K. Kamath, J. Caverlee, K. Lee, and Z. Cheng. Spatio-temporal dynamics of online memes: A study of geo-tagged tweets. In WWW 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. H. Kwak, C. Lee, H. Park, and S. Moon. What is twitter, a social network or a news media? In WWW 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. T. Lappas, K. Liu, and E. Terzi. A survey of algorithms and systems for expert location in social networks. In Social Network Data Analytics. Springer, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. W. Li, C. Eickhoff, and A. P. de Vries. Geo-spatial domain expertise in microblogs. In ECIR 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. X. Liu, W. B. Croft, and M. Koll. Finding experts in community-based question-answering services. In CIKM 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. C. Marshall and F. Shipman. Experiences surveying the crowd: Reflections on methods, participation, and reliability. In ACM Web Science 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. M. Naaman, Y. J. Song, A. Paepcke, and H. Garcia-Molina. Automatic organization for digital photographs with geographic coordinates. In JCDL 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. S. Nowak and S. Rüger. How reliable are annotations via crowdsourcing: a study about inter-annotator agreement for multi-label image annotation. In Proceedings of the international conference on Multimedia information retrieval, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. A. Pal and S. Counts. Identifying topical authorities in microblogs. In WSDM 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. S. Scellato, A. Noulas, R. Lambiotte, and C. Mascolo. Socio-spatial properties of online location-based social networks. In ICWSM 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. W. R. Tobler. A computer movie simulating urban growth in the detroit region. Economic Geography, 46:pp. 234--240, 1970.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. J. Weng, E. P. Lim, J. Jiang, and Q. He. TwitterRank: finding topic-sensitive influential twitterers. In WSDM 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. M. Ye, D. Shou, W.-C. Lee, P. Yin, and K. Janowicz. On the semantic annotation of places in location-based social networks. In SIGKDD 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. M. Ye, P. Yin, W.-C. Lee, and D.-L. Lee. Exploiting geographical influence for collaborative point-of-interest recommendation. In SIGIR 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. M. Yuan, L. Chen, and P. S. Yu. Personalized privacy protection in social networks. PVLDB, 4(2):141--150, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. J. Zhang, M. S. Ackerman, and L. Adamic. Expertise networks in online communities: structure and algorithms. In WWW 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. J. Zhang, J. Tang, and J. Li. Expert finding in a social network. In Advances in Databases: Concepts, Systems and Applications, volume 4443 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. V. W. Zheng, Y. Zheng, X. Xie, and Q. Yang. Collaborative location and activity recommendations with gps history data. In WWW 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Who is the barbecue king of texas?: a geo-spatial approach to finding local experts on twitter

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGIR '14: Proceedings of the 37th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research & development in information retrieval
      July 2014
      1330 pages
      ISBN:9781450322577
      DOI:10.1145/2600428

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 3 July 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      SIGIR '14 Paper Acceptance Rate82of387submissions,21%Overall Acceptance Rate792of3,983submissions,20%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader