skip to main content
10.1145/2600428.2609591acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Discrimination between tasks with user activity patterns during information search

Published:03 July 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Can the activity patterns of page use during information search sessions discriminate between different types of information seeking tasks? We model sequences of interactions with search result and content pages during information search sessions. Two representations are created: the sequences of page use and a cognitive representation of page interactions. The cognitive representation is based on logged eye movement patterns of textual information acquisition via the reading process. Page sequence actions from task sessions (n=109) in a user study are analyzed. The study tasks differed from one another in basic dimensions of complexity, specificity,level, and the type of information product (intellectual or factual). The results show that differences in task types can be measured at both the level of observations of page type sequences and at the level of cognitive activity on the pages. We discuss the implications for personalization of search systems, measurement of task similarity and the development of user-centered information systems that can support the user's current and expected search intentions.

References

  1. Alonso, O., Gertz, M., and Baeza-Yates, R. A. On the value of temporal information in information retrieval. SIGIR Forum 41, 2 (2007), 35--41. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bierig, R., Gwizdka, J., and Cole, M. J. A user-centered experiment and logging framework for interactive information retrieval. In Proceedings of the SIGIR 2009 Workshop on Understanding the User: Logging and interpreting user interactions in information search and retrieval. (July 2009), N. J. Belkin, R. Bierig, G. Buscher, L. van Elst, J. Gwizdka, J. Jose, and J. Teevan, Eds., CEUR, p. 8--11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Borlund, P. The IIR evaluation model: A framework for evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems. Information Research 8, 3 (2003).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Buscher, G., Dengel, A., and van Elst, L. Query expansion using gaze-based feedback on the subdocument level. In Proceedings of SIGIR '08 (Singapore, 2008), ACM, pp. 387--394. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Cole, M. J., Gwizdka, J., Liu, C., Belkin, N. J., Bierig, R., and Zhang, X. Task and user effects on reading patterns in information search. Interacting with Computers 23, 4 (July 2011), 346--362.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Cole, M. J., Gwizdka, J., Liu, C., and Belkin, N. J. Dynamic assessment of information acquisition effort during interactive search. In Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology Conference (2011) (New Orleans, LA, October 2011), vol. 48, ASIST, p. 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Cole, M. J., Gwizdka, J., Liu, C., Belkin, N. J.,Bierig, R., and Zhang, X. Inferring user knowledge level from eye movement patterns, Information Processing & Management 49 (November 2012), 1075--1091. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Findlay, J., and Gilchrist, I. Active Vision: ThePsychology of Looking and Seeing. Oxford University Press, New York, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Gao, B., Liu, T.-Y., Liu, Y., Wang, T., Ma, Z.-M., and Li, H. Page importance computation based on Markov processes. Information Retrieval 14, 5 (Oct.2011), 488--514. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Gwidka, J. Cognitive load and web search tasks. HCIR, 2009. Washington D.C.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Gwizdka, J. and Spence, I. What can searching behavior tell us about the difficulty of information tasks? A study of Web navigation. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 43, 1 (2006), 1--22.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Han, S., Yue, Z., and He, D. Automatic detection of search tactic in individual information seeking: A Hidden Markov Model Approach. In iConference 2013 Proceedings (2013), pp. 712--716.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Hendahewa, C., and Shah, C. Segmental analysis and evaluation of user focused search process. In International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA) (2013), IEEE, pp. 291--294. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Inhoff, A. W., and Liu, W. The perceptual span and oculomotor activity during the reading of Chinese sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance 24, 1 (1998), 20--34.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Kellar, M., Watters, C., and Shepherd, M. A field study characterizing Web-based information-seeking tasks. JASIST 58, 7 (2007), 999--1018. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Li, Y. Relationships among work tasks, search tasks,and interactive information searching behavior. PhD thesis, Rutgers University, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Li, Y. Exploring the relationships between work task and search task in information search. JASIST, pp. 275--291, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Liu, Y., Ma, Z.-M., and Zhou, C. Web Markov skeleton processes and their applications. Tohoku Mathematical Journal 63, 4 (2011), 665--695.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Marchionini, G. Information-seeking strategies of novices using a full-text electronic encyclopedia. JASIST 40, 1 (1989), 54--66. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Marchionini, G., and Maurer, H. The roles of digital libraries in teaching and learning.Communications of the ACM 38, 4 (1995), 67--75. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Morris, R. Lexical and message-level sentence context effects on fixation times in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 20, 1 (1994), 92.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Pollatsek, A., Rayner, K., and Balota, D. A. Inferences about eye movement control from the perceptual span in reading. Perception & Psychophysics 40, 2 (1986), 123--130.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Qiu, L. Markov models of search state patterns in a hypertext information retrieval system. JASIST 44, 7 (1993), 413--427. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Rayner, K. Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin 124 (1998), 372--422.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Rayner, K., Chace, K. H., Slattery, T. J., and Ashby, J. Eye movements as reflections of comprehension processes in reading. Scientific Studiesof Reading 10, 3 (2006), 241--255.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Rayner, K., and Pollatsek, A. The Psychology of Reading. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, New Jersey, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Reichle, E. D., Pollatsek, A., and Rayner, K. EZ Reader: A cognitive-control, serial-attention model of eye-movement behavior during reading. Cognitive Systems Research 7, 1 (2006), 4--22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Reichle, E. D., Rayner, K., and Pollatsek, A. The EZ Reader model of eye-movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26, 04 (2004), 445--476.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Reingold, E., and Rayner, K. Examining the word identification stages hypothesized by the EZ Reader model. Psychological Science 17, 9 (2006), 742--746.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Sereno, S. C., O'Donnell, P., and Rayner, K. Eye movements and lexical ambiguity resolution: Investigating the subordinate-bias effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 32, 2 (2006), 335.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Triesch, J., Ballard, D. H., Hayhoe, M. M., and Sullivan, B. T. What you see is what you need. Journal of Vision 3 (2003), 86--94.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Tsai, C., and McConkie, G. The perceptual span in reading Chinese text: A moving window study. In Seventh International Conference on the Cognitive Processing of Chinese and Other Asian Languages, Hong Kong (1995).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. White, R. W., and Kelly, D. A study on the effects of personalization and task information on implicit feedback performance. In CKIM'06 (Arlington, Virginia,USA, November 2006), ACM, pp. 297--306. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Williams, R., and Morris, R. Eye movements, word familiarity, and vocabulary acquisition. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 16, 1 (2004), 312--339.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Discrimination between tasks with user activity patterns during information search

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGIR '14: Proceedings of the 37th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research & development in information retrieval
      July 2014
      1330 pages
      ISBN:9781450322577
      DOI:10.1145/2600428

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 3 July 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      SIGIR '14 Paper Acceptance Rate82of387submissions,21%Overall Acceptance Rate792of3,983submissions,20%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader