skip to main content
10.1145/2600428.2609608acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Does product recommendation meet its waterloo in unexplored categories?: no, price comes to help

Authors Info & Claims
Published:03 July 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

State-of-the-art methods for product recommendation encounter significant performance drop in categories where a user has no purchase history. This problem needs to be addressed since current online retailers are moving beyond single category and attempting to be diversified. In this paper, we investigate the challenge problem of product recommendation in unexplored categories and discover that the price, a factor transferrable across categories, can improve the recommendation performance significantly. Through our investigation, we address four research questions progressively: 1) what is the impact of unexplored category on recommendation performance? 2) How to represent the price factor from the recommendation point of view? 3) What does price factor across categories mean to recommendation? 4) How to utilize price factor across categories for recommendation in unexplored categories? Based on a series of experiments and analysis conducted on a dataset collected from a leading E-commerce website, we discover valuable findings for the above four questions: first, unexplored categories cause performance drop by 40% relatively for current recommendation systems; second, the price factor can be represented as either a quantity for a product or a distribution for a user to improve performance; third, consumer behavior with respect to price factor across categories is complicated and needs to be carefully modeled; finally and most importantly, we propose a new method which encodes the two perspectives of the price factor. The proposed method significantly improves the recommendation performance in unexplored categories over the state-of-the-art baseline systems and shortens the performance gap by 43% relatively.

References

  1. A. Ahmed, B. Kanagal, S. Pandey, V. Josifovski, L. G. Pueyo, and J. Yuan. Latent factor models with additive and hierarchically-smoothed user preferences. In WSDM, pages 385--394, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. M. Brown, N. Pope, and K. Voges. Buying or browsing?: An exploration of shopping orientations and online purchase intention. European Journal of Marketing, 37(11/12):1666--1684, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. H. Chen. The impact of comments and recommendation system on online shopper buying behaviour. JNW, 7(2):345--350, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. T. Chen, H. Li, Q. Yang, and Y. Yu. General functional matrix factorization using gradient boosting. In ICML, pages 436--444, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. D. M. Fleder and K. Hosanagar. Blockbuster culture's next rise or fall: The impact of recommender systems on sales diversity. Management Science, 55(5):697--712, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. B. J. Frey and D. Dueck. Clustering by passing messages between data points. Science, 315:972--976, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Y. Hu, Y. Koren, and C. Volinsky. Collaborative filtering for implicit feedback datasets. In ICDM, pages 263--272, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. B. J. Jansen. Chris anderson, the long tail: Why the future of business is selling less or more, hyperion, new york (2006) isbn 1--4013-0237--8 $24.95. Inf. Process. Manage., 43(4):1147--1148, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. H. Ma, D. Zhou, C. Liu, M. R. Lyu, and I. King. Recommender systems with social regularization. In Proceedings of the fourth ACM international conference on Web search and data mining, WSDM '11, pages 287--296, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. K. Onuma, H. Tong, and C. Faloutsos. Tangent: a novel, 'surprise me', recommendation algorithm. In KDD, pages 657--666, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. S.-T. Park and W. Chu. Pairwise preference regression for cold-start recommendation. In RecSys, pages 21--28, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. A. Paterek. Improving regularized singular value decomposition for collaborative filtering. In Proc. KDD Cup Workshop at SIGKDD'07, 13th ACM Int. Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pages 39--42, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. I. Porteous, A. U. Asuncion, and M. Welling. Bayesian matrix factorization with side information and dirichlet process mixtures. In AAAI, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. G. Salton and M. J. McGill. Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, NY, USA, 1986. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. A. P. Singh and G. J. Gordon. Relational learning via collective matrix factorization. In KDD, pages 650--658, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. J. Wang and Y. Zhang. Utilizing marginal net utility for recommendation in e-commerce. In SIGIR, pages 1003--1012, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. J. Wang and Y. Zhang. Opportunity model for e-commerce recommendation: right product; right time. In SIGIR, pages 303--312, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Q. Yuan, L. Chen, and S. Zhao. Factorization vs. regularization: fusing heterogeneous social relationships in top-n recommendation. In RecSys, pages 245--252, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. G. Zhao, M.-L. Lee, W. Hsu, and W. Chen. Increasing temporal diversity with purchase intervals. In SIGIR, pages 165--174, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. C.-N. Ziegler, S. M. McNee, J. A. Konstan, and G. Lausen. Improving recommendation lists through topic diversification. In WWW, pages 22--32, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Does product recommendation meet its waterloo in unexplored categories?: no, price comes to help

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SIGIR '14: Proceedings of the 37th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research & development in information retrieval
        July 2014
        1330 pages
        ISBN:9781450322577
        DOI:10.1145/2600428

        Copyright © 2014 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 3 July 2014

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        SIGIR '14 Paper Acceptance Rate82of387submissions,21%Overall Acceptance Rate792of3,983submissions,20%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader