Guoping Rong
ABSTRACT
Software projects are performed in different contexts and, thus, require a context-specific selection and adoption of adequate methods. The suitable selection and tailoring, however, still constitute a challenging task. For this, in this paper, we discuss several issues concerning process definition and adoption, and motivate more research regarding the improvement of evidence-based method selection and adoption for the respective context.
- B. Bygstad, A. Fagerstrøm, and T. Østensen, "Exploring the relationship between software development processes and IT based business innovation. A quantitative study in Norway," Proceedings of NOKOBIT, 2004.Google Scholar
- H. Zhang and M. A. Babar, "An empirical investigation of systematic reviews in software engineering," in Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM), 2011 International Symposium on, 2011, pp. 87-96. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. E. Hannay, T. Dybå, E. Arisholm, and D. I. Sjøberg, "The effectiveness of pair programming: A meta-analysis," Information and Software Technology, vol. 51, pp. 1110- 1122, 2009. Google ScholarDigital Library
- H. C. Esfahani and E. Yu, "A repository of agile method fragments," in New Modeling Concepts for Today’s Software Processes,: Springer, 2010, pp. 163-174. Google ScholarDigital Library
- W. S. Humphrey, "A discipline for software engineering," 1995. Google ScholarDigital Library
- K. Schwaber and M. Beedle, "Agile Software Development with Scrum. 2001," ed: Prentice Hall, 2003. Google ScholarDigital Library
- G. Kalus and M. Kuhrmann, "Criteria for software process tailoring: a systematic review," in Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Software and System Process, 2013, pp. 171-180. Google ScholarDigital Library
- T. Dybå, D. I. Sjøberg, and D. S. Cruzes, "What works for whom, where, when, and why?: on the role of context in empirical software engineering," in Proceedings of the ACM-IEEE international symposium on Empirical software engineering and measurement, 2012, pp. 19-28. Google ScholarDigital Library
- K. Beck and C. Andres, Extreme programming explained: embrace change: Addison-Wesley Professional, 2004. Google ScholarDigital Library
- G. Rong, D. Shao, and H. Zhang, "SCRUM-PSP: Embracing Process Agility and Discipline," in Software Engineering Conference (APSEC), 2010 17th Asia Pacific, 2010, pp. 316- 325. Figure 1. Three dimensions Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Are we ready for software process selection, tailoring, and composition?
Recommendations
Criteria for software process tailoring: a systematic review
ICSSP 2013: Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Software and System ProcessIndependently from which software process was selected for a company or a project, the selected software process usually cannot be applied without any customization. Although the need to tailor a software process to specific project requirements seems ...
Software Process Tailoring: An Empirical Investigation
A well-defined software process is critical for success in software projects. Software process tailoring refers to the activity of tuning a standardized process to meet the needs of a specific project. We conducted two case studies that address the ...
Using aspects to support the software process: XP over Eclipse
AOSD '06: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Aspect-oriented software developmentUsually, aspects enhance a software product by being composed - or woven - into it. Here, on the other hand, we use aspects to support the software development process itself. The underlying system, i.e., the system to which the aspects are woven, is ...
Comments