skip to main content
10.1145/2611009.2611015acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesperdisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
tutorial

Vote With Your Feet: Local Community Polling on Urban Screens

Authors Info & Claims
Published:03 June 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Falling prices have led to an ongoing spread of public displays in urban areas. Still, they mostly show passive content such as commercials and digital signage. At the same time, technological advances have enabled the creation of interactive displays potentially increasing their attractiveness for the audience, e.g. through providing a platform for civic discourse. This poses considerable challenges, since displays need to communicate the opportunity to engage, motivate the audience to do so, and be easy to use. In this paper we present Vote With Your Feet, a hyperlocal public polling tool for urban screens allowing users to express their opinions. Similar to vox populi interviews on TV or polls on news websites, the tool is meant to reflect the mindset of the community on topics such as current affairs, cultural identity and local matters. It is novel in that it focuses on a situated civic discourse and provides a tangible user interface, tackling the mentioned challenges. It shows one Yes/No question at a time and enables users to vote by stepping on one of two tangible buttons on the ground. This user interface was introduced to attract people's attention and to lower participation barriers. Our field study showed that Vote With Your Feet is perceived as inviting and that it can spark discussions among co-located people.

References

  1. Alt, F., Kubitza, T., Bial, D., Zaidan, F., Ortel, M., Zurmaar, B., Lewen, T., Shirazi, A. S., and Schmidt, A. Digifieds: Insights into deploying digital public notice areas in the wild. In Proc. MUM '11, ACM (2011), 165--174. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Alt, F., Schneegass, S., Schmidt, A., Müller, J., and Memarovic, N. How to evaluate public displays. In Proc. PerDis'12, ACM (2012), 171--176. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Ananny, M., and Strohecker, C. Textales: creating interactive forums with urban publics. Handb. Urb. Inf., IGI, Hershey (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Behrens, M. Swipe 'i like': location based digital narrative through embedding the 'like' button in the real world. In Proc. C&T '11 (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Brignull, H., and Rogers, Y. Enticing people to interact with large public displays in public spaces. In Proc. INTERACT'03, vol. 3 (2003), 17--24.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Claes, S., and Vande Moere, A. Street infographics: Raising awareness of local issues through a situated urban visualization. In Proc. PerDis '13, ACM (2013). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Dalsgaard, P., Halskov, K., and Nielsen, R. Towards a design space explorer for media facades. In Proc. OzCHI '08, ACM (2008), 219--226. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Foth, M., Fischer, F., and Satchell, C. From movie screens to moving screens: mapping qualities of new urban interactions. In Proc. MediaCity, University at Buffalo (2013), 194--204.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Foth, M., Parra Agudelo, L., and Palleis, R. Digital soapboxes: Towards an interaction design agenda for situated civic innovation. Adj. Proc. Ubicomp'13 (2013). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Foth, M., and Podkalicka, A. Communication policies for urban village connections. Comm. Policy & Res. For. (2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Gianluca, S., Milano, M., Saldivar, J., Nasir, T., and Zancanaro, M. Agora2. 0: enhancing civic partici- pation through a public display. In Proc. CT'13, ACM (2013). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Huang, E. M., Koster, A., and Borchers, J. Overcoming assumptions and uncovering practices: When does the public really look at public displays? In Proc. Pervasive'08. Springer, 2008, 228--243. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Itti, L., and Baldi, P. F. Bayesian surprise attracts human attention. In Adv. in neur. inf. proc. sys. (2005), 547--554.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Kukka, H., Oja, H., Kostakos, V., Gonçalves, J., and Ojala, T. What makes you click: Exploring visual signals to entice interaction on public displays. In Proc. CHI'13, ACM (2013), 1699--1708. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Luojus, P., Koskela, J., Ollila, K., Mäki, S.-M., Kulpa-Bogossia, R., Heikkinen, T., and Ojala, T. Wordster: Collaborative versus competitive gaming using interactive public displays and mobile phones. In Proc. PerDis '13, ACM (2013), 109--114. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Memarovic, N., Elhart, I., and Langheinrich, M. Funsquare: First experiences with autopoiesic content. In Proc. MUM'11, ACM (2011), 175--184. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Müller, J., Alt, F., Michelis, D., and Schmidt, A. Requirements and Design Space for Interactive Public Displays. In Proc. MM'10, ACM (New York, 2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Munson, S. A., Rosengren, E., and Resnick, P. Thanks and tweets: comparing two public displays. In Proc. CSCW'11, ACM (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Nielsen, J. Participation inequality: Encouraging more users to contribute. Jakob Nielsen's alertbox 9 (2006), 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. O'Hara, K., Lipson, M., Jansen, M., Unger, A., Jeffries, H., and Macer, P. Jukola: Democratic music choice in a public space. In Proc. DIS'04, ACM (2004), 145--154. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Paek, T., Agrawala, M., Basu, S., Drucker, S., Kristjansson, T., Logan, R., Toyama, K., and Wilson, A. Toward universal mobile interaction for shared displays. In Proc. CSCW '04, ACM (2004), 266--269. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Patton, M. Q. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. SAGE Publications, inc, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Redhead, F., and Brereton, M. Designing interaction for local communications. In Proc. INTERACT'09. Springer, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Rogers, Y. Interaction design gone wild: Striving for wild theory. Interactions 18, 4 (July 2011), 58--62. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Roth Smith, W. Moving data: The iphone and the future of media. Jour. of Comm. 63, 6 (2013), E1--E5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Schroeter, R. Engaging new digital locals with interactive urban screens to collaboratively improve the city. In Proc. CSCW'12, ACM (2012), 227--236. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Schroeter, R., and Foth, M. Discussions in space. In Proc. OzCHI SIG: Design -- Open 24/7, ACM (2009), 381--384. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Seeburger, J., and Foth, M. Content sharing on public screens: Experiences through iterating social and spatial contexts. In Proc. OzCHI'12, ACM (2012). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Silverman, D. Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook. SAGE Publications Limited, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Taylor, N., Marshall, J., Blum-Ross, A., Mills, J., Rogers, J., Egglestone, P., Frohlich, D. M., Wright, P., and Olivier, P. Viewpoint: Empowering communities with situated voting devices. In Proc. CHI '12, ACM (2012). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Valkanova, N., Walter, R., Moere, A. V., and Müller, J. Myposition: Sparking civic discourse by a public interactive poll visualization. In Proc. CSCW'14, ACM (2014). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Vote With Your Feet: Local Community Polling on Urban Screens

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      PerDis '14: Proceedings of The International Symposium on Pervasive Displays
      June 2014
      217 pages
      ISBN:9781450329521
      DOI:10.1145/2611009
      • Editor:
      • Sven Gehring,
      • General Chair:
      • Sebastian Boring,
      • Program Chair:
      • Aaron Quigley

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 3 June 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • tutorial
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      PerDis '14 Paper Acceptance Rate30of50submissions,60%Overall Acceptance Rate192of346submissions,55%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader