ABSTRACT
Falling prices have led to an ongoing spread of public displays in urban areas. Still, they mostly show passive content such as commercials and digital signage. At the same time, technological advances have enabled the creation of interactive displays potentially increasing their attractiveness for the audience, e.g. through providing a platform for civic discourse. This poses considerable challenges, since displays need to communicate the opportunity to engage, motivate the audience to do so, and be easy to use. In this paper we present Vote With Your Feet, a hyperlocal public polling tool for urban screens allowing users to express their opinions. Similar to vox populi interviews on TV or polls on news websites, the tool is meant to reflect the mindset of the community on topics such as current affairs, cultural identity and local matters. It is novel in that it focuses on a situated civic discourse and provides a tangible user interface, tackling the mentioned challenges. It shows one Yes/No question at a time and enables users to vote by stepping on one of two tangible buttons on the ground. This user interface was introduced to attract people's attention and to lower participation barriers. Our field study showed that Vote With Your Feet is perceived as inviting and that it can spark discussions among co-located people.
- Alt, F., Kubitza, T., Bial, D., Zaidan, F., Ortel, M., Zurmaar, B., Lewen, T., Shirazi, A. S., and Schmidt, A. Digifieds: Insights into deploying digital public notice areas in the wild. In Proc. MUM '11, ACM (2011), 165--174. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Alt, F., Schneegass, S., Schmidt, A., Müller, J., and Memarovic, N. How to evaluate public displays. In Proc. PerDis'12, ACM (2012), 171--176. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ananny, M., and Strohecker, C. Textales: creating interactive forums with urban publics. Handb. Urb. Inf., IGI, Hershey (2009).Google Scholar
- Behrens, M. Swipe 'i like': location based digital narrative through embedding the 'like' button in the real world. In Proc. C&T '11 (2011).Google Scholar
- Brignull, H., and Rogers, Y. Enticing people to interact with large public displays in public spaces. In Proc. INTERACT'03, vol. 3 (2003), 17--24.Google Scholar
- Claes, S., and Vande Moere, A. Street infographics: Raising awareness of local issues through a situated urban visualization. In Proc. PerDis '13, ACM (2013). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dalsgaard, P., Halskov, K., and Nielsen, R. Towards a design space explorer for media facades. In Proc. OzCHI '08, ACM (2008), 219--226. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Foth, M., Fischer, F., and Satchell, C. From movie screens to moving screens: mapping qualities of new urban interactions. In Proc. MediaCity, University at Buffalo (2013), 194--204.Google Scholar
- Foth, M., Parra Agudelo, L., and Palleis, R. Digital soapboxes: Towards an interaction design agenda for situated civic innovation. Adj. Proc. Ubicomp'13 (2013). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Foth, M., and Podkalicka, A. Communication policies for urban village connections. Comm. Policy & Res. For. (2007).Google Scholar
- Gianluca, S., Milano, M., Saldivar, J., Nasir, T., and Zancanaro, M. Agora2. 0: enhancing civic partici- pation through a public display. In Proc. CT'13, ACM (2013). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Huang, E. M., Koster, A., and Borchers, J. Overcoming assumptions and uncovering practices: When does the public really look at public displays? In Proc. Pervasive'08. Springer, 2008, 228--243. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Itti, L., and Baldi, P. F. Bayesian surprise attracts human attention. In Adv. in neur. inf. proc. sys. (2005), 547--554.Google Scholar
- Kukka, H., Oja, H., Kostakos, V., Gonçalves, J., and Ojala, T. What makes you click: Exploring visual signals to entice interaction on public displays. In Proc. CHI'13, ACM (2013), 1699--1708. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Luojus, P., Koskela, J., Ollila, K., Mäki, S.-M., Kulpa-Bogossia, R., Heikkinen, T., and Ojala, T. Wordster: Collaborative versus competitive gaming using interactive public displays and mobile phones. In Proc. PerDis '13, ACM (2013), 109--114. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Memarovic, N., Elhart, I., and Langheinrich, M. Funsquare: First experiences with autopoiesic content. In Proc. MUM'11, ACM (2011), 175--184. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Müller, J., Alt, F., Michelis, D., and Schmidt, A. Requirements and Design Space for Interactive Public Displays. In Proc. MM'10, ACM (New York, 2010). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Munson, S. A., Rosengren, E., and Resnick, P. Thanks and tweets: comparing two public displays. In Proc. CSCW'11, ACM (2011). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nielsen, J. Participation inequality: Encouraging more users to contribute. Jakob Nielsen's alertbox 9 (2006), 2006.Google Scholar
- O'Hara, K., Lipson, M., Jansen, M., Unger, A., Jeffries, H., and Macer, P. Jukola: Democratic music choice in a public space. In Proc. DIS'04, ACM (2004), 145--154. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Paek, T., Agrawala, M., Basu, S., Drucker, S., Kristjansson, T., Logan, R., Toyama, K., and Wilson, A. Toward universal mobile interaction for shared displays. In Proc. CSCW '04, ACM (2004), 266--269. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Patton, M. Q. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. SAGE Publications, inc, 1990.Google Scholar
- Redhead, F., and Brereton, M. Designing interaction for local communications. In Proc. INTERACT'09. Springer, 2009. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rogers, Y. Interaction design gone wild: Striving for wild theory. Interactions 18, 4 (July 2011), 58--62. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Roth Smith, W. Moving data: The iphone and the future of media. Jour. of Comm. 63, 6 (2013), E1--E5.Google Scholar
- Schroeter, R. Engaging new digital locals with interactive urban screens to collaboratively improve the city. In Proc. CSCW'12, ACM (2012), 227--236. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Schroeter, R., and Foth, M. Discussions in space. In Proc. OzCHI SIG: Design -- Open 24/7, ACM (2009), 381--384. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Seeburger, J., and Foth, M. Content sharing on public screens: Experiences through iterating social and spatial contexts. In Proc. OzCHI'12, ACM (2012). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Silverman, D. Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook. SAGE Publications Limited, 2013.Google Scholar
- Taylor, N., Marshall, J., Blum-Ross, A., Mills, J., Rogers, J., Egglestone, P., Frohlich, D. M., Wright, P., and Olivier, P. Viewpoint: Empowering communities with situated voting devices. In Proc. CHI '12, ACM (2012). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Valkanova, N., Walter, R., Moere, A. V., and Müller, J. Myposition: Sparking civic discourse by a public interactive poll visualization. In Proc. CSCW'14, ACM (2014). Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Vote With Your Feet: Local Community Polling on Urban Screens
Recommendations
Vote as you go: blending interfaces for community engagement into the urban space
C&T '15: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Communities and TechnologiesThis paper presents a series of studies on situated interfaces for community engagement. Firstly, we identify five recurring design challenges as well as four common strategies used to overcome them. We then assess the effectiveness of these strategies ...
Soapbox: a situated platform for civic engagement
MUM '16: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous MultimediaThis paper presents an interactive Soapbox platform, which utilizes networked public displays to encourage local citizens to participate in civic engagement. Soapbox is comprised of three subsystems: Soapbox for speaker (SFS), Soapbox for audience (SFA) ...
The interacting places framework: conceptualizing public display applications that promote community interaction and place awareness
PerDis '12: Proceedings of the 2012 International Symposium on Pervasive DisplaysThe proliferation of public displays, along with ubiquitous wireless communication and sensing technology, has made it possible to create a novel public communication medium: open networked pervasive displays would allow citizens to provide their own ...
Comments