skip to main content
10.1145/2623330.2623357acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An empirical study of reserve price optimisation in real-time bidding

Published: 24 August 2014 Publication History

Abstract

In this paper, we report the first empirical study and live test of the reserve price optimisation problem in the context of Real-Time Bidding (RTB) display advertising from an operational environment. A reserve price is the minimum that the auctioneer would accept from bidders in auctions, and in a second price auction it could potentially uplift the auctioneer's revenue by charging winners the reserve price instead of the second highest bids. As such it has been used for sponsored search and been well studied in that context. However, comparing with sponsored search and contextual advertising, this problem in the RTB context is less understood yet more critical for publishers because 1) bidders have to submit a bid for each individual impression, which mostly is associated with user data that is subject to change over time. This, coupled with practical constraints such as the budget, campaigns' life time, etc. makes the theoretical result from optimal auction theory not necessarily applicable and a further empirical study is required to confirm its optimality from the real-world system; 2) in RTB an advertiser is facing nearly unlimited supply and the auction is almost done in "last second", which encourages spending less on the high cost ad placements. This could imply the loss of bid volume over time if a correct reserve price is not in place. In this paper we empirically examine several commonly adopted algorithms for setting up a reserve price. We report our results of a large scale online experiment in a production platform. The results suggest the our proposed game theory based OneShot algorithm performed the best and the superiority is significant in most cases.

References

[1]
Anderson, T. W., and Darling, D. A. A Test of Goodness of Fit. Journal of the American Statistical Association 49 (1954), 765--769.
[2]
Ausubel, L. M., and Cramton, P. Vickrey auctions with reserve pricing, 2004.
[3]
Bapna, R., Goes, P., Gupta, A., and Others. Insights and analyses of online auctions. Communications of the ACM 44, 11 (2001), 42--50.
[4]
Bharadwaj, V., Ma, W., Schwarz, M., Shanmugasundaram, J., Vee, E., Xie, J., and Yang, J. Pricing guaranteed contracts in online display advertising. In Proceedings of the ACM CIKM (2010).
[5]
Bonnans, J. F., Gilbert, J. C., Lemaréchal, C., and Sagastiz-ábal, C. A. Numerical optimization: theoretical and practical aspects. Springer, 2006.
[6]
Broder, A., Fontoura, M., Josifovski, V., and Riedel, L. A semantic approach to contextual advertising. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGIR (2007).
[7]
Cavallo, R., McAfee, R. P., and Vassilvitskii, S. Display Advertising Auctions with Arbitrage. 1--21.
[8]
Chakraborty, T., Even-Dar, E., Guha, S., Mansour, Y., and Muthukrishnan, S. Selective call out and real time bidding. Internet and Network Economics (2010), 145--157.
[9]
Crichton, N. Wilcoxon signed rank test. Journal of Clinical Nursing, Blackwell Science Ltd (2000).
[10]
Edelman, B., Ostrovsky, M., and Schwarz, M. Internet advertising and the generalized second price auction: Selling billions of dollars worth of keywords. Tech. rep., National Bureau of Economic Research, 2005.
[11]
Edelman, B., and Schwarz, M. Optimal auction design in a multi-unit environment: The case of sponsored search auctions. Unpublished manuscript, Harvard Business School (2006).
[12]
EMarketer. RTB Ad Spend Continues Robust Growth - eMarketer.
[13]
Even-Dar, E., Feldman, J., Mansour, Y., and Muthukrishnan, S. Position auctions with bidder-specific minimum prices. Internet and Network Economics (2008), 577--584.
[14]
Feldman, J., Mirrokni, V., Muthukrishnan, S., and Pai, M. M. Auctions with intermediaries: extended abstract. In Proceedings of the ACM EC 2010 (2010).
[15]
Ghosh, A., McAfee, P., Papineni, K., and Vassilvitskii, S. Bidding for representative allocations for display advertising. Internet and Network Economics (2009), 208--219.
[16]
Ghosh, A., Rubinstein, B. I. P., Vassilvitskii, S., and Zinkevich, M. Adaptive bidding for display advertising. In Proceedings of the WWW 2009 (2009).
[17]
Greenwood, P. E., and Nikulin, M. S. A guide to chi-squared testing, vol. 280. Wiley-Interscience, 1996.
[18]
Kauffman, R. J., and Wood, C. A. Running up the bid: detecting, predicting, and preventing reserve price shilling in online auctions. In Proceedings of the ACM EC 2003 (2003).
[19]
Krishna, V. Auction theory. Academic press, 2009.
[20]
Levin, D., and Smith, J. L. Optimal reservation prices in auctions. The Economic Journal 106, 438 (1996), 1271--1283.
[21]
Matthews, S. A technical primer on auction theory I: Independent private values. No. 1096. 1995.
[22]
McAfee, R. P., and Vincent, D. Sequentially optimal auctions. Games and Economic Behavior 18, 2 (1997), 246--276.
[23]
Muthukrishnan, S. Ad exchanges: Research issues. Internet and network economics 8, 2 (2009), 1--12.
[24]
Myerson, R. B. Optimal auction design. Mathematics of operations research 6, 1 (1981), 58--73.
[25]
Osborne, M. A Course in Game Theory. 2011.
[26]
Ostrovsky, M., and Schwarz, M. Reserve prices in internet advertising auctions: A field experiment. Search (2009), 1--18.
[27]
Perlich, C., Dalessandro, B., Hook, R., Stitelman, O., Raeder, T., and Provost, F. Bid optimizing and inventory scoring in targeted online advertising. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD 2012 (2012), p. 804.
[28]
Riley, J. G., and Samuelson, W. F. Optimal auctions. The American Economic Review (1981), 381--392.
[29]
Roels, G., and Fridgeirsdottir, K. Dynamic revenue management for online display advertising. Journal of Revenue & Pricing Management 8, 5 (May 2009), 452--466.
[30]
Stein, C. M. Estimation of the mean of a multivariate normal distribution. The annals of Statistics (1981), 1135--1151.
[31]
Xiao, B., Yang, W., and Li, J. Optimal Reserve Price for the Generalized Second-Price Auction in Sponsored Search Advertising. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research 10, 3 (2009), 114.
[32]
Xu, H., Bates, C. K., and Shatz, S. M. Real-time model checking for shill detection in live online auctions. In Proc. Int. Conf. Software Engineering Research and Practice (SERP'09) (2009), pp. 134--140.
[33]
Yan, J., Liu, N., Wang, G., and Zhang, W. How much can behavioral targeting help online advertising? Proceeding WWW '09 Proceedings of the 18th international conference on World wide web (2009), 261--270.
[34]
Yuan, S., Wang, J., and Zhao, X. Real-time Bidding for Online Advertising: Measurement and Analysis. In Proceedings of the ADKDD workshop 2013 (2013).

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Individual Welfare Guarantees in the Autobidding World with Machine-learned AdviceProceedings of the ACM Web Conference 202410.1145/3589334.3645660(267-275)Online publication date: 13-May-2024
  • (2024)Fairness-Aware Competitive Bidding Influence Maximization in Social NetworksIEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems10.1109/TCSS.2023.328560511:2(2147-2159)Online publication date: Apr-2024
  • (2024)A technique to forecast Pakistan’s news using deep hybrid learning modelInternational Journal of Information Technology10.1007/s41870-024-01781-616:4(2505-2516)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. An empirical study of reserve price optimisation in real-time bidding

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      KDD '14: Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining
      August 2014
      2028 pages
      ISBN:9781450329569
      DOI:10.1145/2623330
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 24 August 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. display advertising
      2. online advertising
      3. real-time bidding
      4. reserve price
      5. revenue optimisation

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Conference

      KDD '14
      Sponsor:

      Acceptance Rates

      KDD '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 151 of 1,036 submissions, 15%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 1,133 of 8,635 submissions, 13%

      Upcoming Conference

      KDD '25

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)43
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
      Reflects downloads up to 01 Mar 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)Individual Welfare Guarantees in the Autobidding World with Machine-learned AdviceProceedings of the ACM Web Conference 202410.1145/3589334.3645660(267-275)Online publication date: 13-May-2024
      • (2024)Fairness-Aware Competitive Bidding Influence Maximization in Social NetworksIEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems10.1109/TCSS.2023.328560511:2(2147-2159)Online publication date: Apr-2024
      • (2024)A technique to forecast Pakistan’s news using deep hybrid learning modelInternational Journal of Information Technology10.1007/s41870-024-01781-616:4(2505-2516)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
      • (2023)A Survey on Bid Optimization in Real-Time Bidding Display AdvertisingACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data10.1145/362860318:3(1-31)Online publication date: 9-Dec-2023
      • (2023)Optimal Real-Time Bidding Strategy for Position Auctions in Online AdvertisingProceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management10.1145/3583780.3614727(4766-4772)Online publication date: 21-Oct-2023
      • (2023)Reserve Price optimization in First-Price Auctions via Multi-Task Learning2023 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM)10.1109/ICDM58522.2023.00029(200-209)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2023
      • (2022)IbexProceedings of the 2022 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security10.1145/3548606.3560651(3223-3237)Online publication date: 7-Nov-2022
      • (2022)A Unified Guaranteed Impression Allocation Framework for Online Display Advertising2022 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM)10.1109/ICDM54844.2022.00079(686-694)Online publication date: Nov-2022
      • (2022)A Bayesian game-enhanced auction model for federated cloud services using blockchainFuture Generation Computer Systems10.1016/j.future.2022.05.017136:C(49-66)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2022
      • (2022)Dynamic Ad Network Ordering Method Using Reinforcement LearningInternational Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems10.1007/s44196-022-00077-615:1Online publication date: 19-Apr-2022
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media