skip to main content
10.1145/2632048.2636075acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesubicompConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

CAMY: applying a pet dog analogy to everyday ubicomp products

Published:13 September 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Ubicomp products have become more important in providing emotional experiences as users increasingly assimilate these products into their everyday lives. In this paper, we explored a new design perspective by applying a pet dog analogy to support emotional experience with ubicomp products. We were inspired by pet dogs, which are already intimate companions to humans and serve essential emotional functions in daily live. Our studies involved four phases. First, through our literature review, we articulated the key characteristics of pet dogs that apply to ubicomp products. Secondly, we applied these characteristics to a design case, CAMY, a mixed media PC peripheral with a camera. Like a pet dog, it interacts emotionally with a user. Thirdly, we conducted a user study with CAMY, which showed the effects of pet-like characteristics on users' emotional experiences, specifically on intimacy, sympathy, and delightedness. Finally, we presented other design cases and discussed the implications of utilizing a pet dog analogy to advance ubicomp systems for improved user experiences.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

p63-row.mov

mov

86.2 MB

p63-row.mp4

mp4

65.6 MB

References

  1. André, E., Klesen, M., Gebhard, P., Allen, S., &Rist, T. (2000). Integrating models of personality and emotions into lifelike characters. In Affective interactions, Springer (2000), 150--165. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Axelrod, L., Hone, K. E-motional Advantage: Performance and Satisfaction Gains with Affective Computing. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2005, ACM Press (2005), 1192--1195. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bartneck, C., &Forlizzi, J. Shaping human-robot interaction: understanding the social aspects of intelligent robotic products. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2009, ACM press (2004), 1731--1731. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Belk, R. W. Metaphoric relationships with pets. Society and Animals 4, 2 (1996), 121--145.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Bell, G. Intimate Ubiquitous Computing. In Proc. Ubicomp 2003, ACM Press (2003), 3--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Bickmore, T. W., & Picard, R. W. Towards caring machines. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2004, ACM Press (2004), 1489--1492. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Borgmann, A. Technology and the Character of Contemporary Life, University of Chicago Press, 1984.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Brave, S., Nass, C., & Hutchinson, K. Computers that care: investigating the effects of orientation of emotion exhibited by an embodied computer agent. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies62, 2 (2005), 161--178. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Buchenau, M., &Suri, J. F. Experience prototyping. In Proc. the 3rd conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques. ACM Press (2000), 424--433. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Chapman, J. Design for (emotional) durability. Design Issues 25, 4 (2009), 29--35.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Chen, C. Y., Kobayashi, M., & Oh, L. M. ShareComp: sharing for companionship. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2005, ACM press (2005), 2074--2078. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Dahlbäck, N., Jönsson, A., &Ahrenberg, L. Wizard of Oz studies---why and how. Knowledge-based systems 6, 4 (1993), 258--266.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Dotson, M. J., & Hyatt, E. M. Understanding dog--human companionship. Journal of Business Research, 61, 5 (2008), 457--466.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Elliot, K., Neustaedter, C., & Greenberg, S. Time, ownership, and awareness: The value of contextual locations in the home. In Proc. Ubicomp 2005,ACM Press (2005), 251--268. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Endenburg, N., Hart, H. T., &Bouw, J. Motives for acquiring companion animals. Journal of Economic Psychology15, 1 (1994), 191--206.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Fogle, B. Interrelations between people and pets. The Canadian veterinary journal 25, 4(1981). 190.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Gaver, W. W., Bowers, J., Boucher, A., Gellerson, H., Pennington, S., Schmidt, A.,... & Walker, B. The drift table: designing for ludic engagement. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2004, ACM Press (2004), 885--900. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Gaver, W. What should we expect from research through design? In Proc. CHI 2012. ACM Press (2012), 937--946. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Helmes, J., Hummels, C., &Sellen, A. The other brother: re-experiencing spontaneous moments from domestic life. In Proc. the 3rd International Conference on TEI, ACM Press (2009), 233--240. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Helmes, J., Taylor, A. S., Cao, X., Höök, K., Schmitt, P., &Villar, N. Rudiments 1, 2 & 3: design speculations on autonomy. In Proc. the 5th international conference on TEI, ACM Press (2011), 145--152. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Herbsleb, J. D.: Metaphorical representation in collaborative software engineering. In Proc. the international joint conference on Work activities coordination and collaboration, ACM Press (1999), 117--126. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Hirschman, E. C. Consumers and their animal companions. Journal of Consumer Research 20, 4 (1994). 616--632.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Holbrook, M. B. Reflections on rocky. Society and Animals 4, 2 (1996), 147--168.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Huang, C. C., Bardzell, J., & Terrell, J. Can your pet rabbit read your email?: a critical analysis of the Nabaztag rabbit. In Proc. DPPI, ACM press (2011), 3. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Jacobsson, M., Ljungblad, S., Bodin, J., Knurek, J., &Holmquist, L. E. GlowBots: robots that evolve relationships. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2007 emerging technologies. ACM Press (2007), 7. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Jacobsson, M. Play, Belief and Stories about Robots: A Case Study of a Pleo Blogging Community. In Proc. of RO-MAN: IEEE (2009), 232--237.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Karlesky, M., &Isbister, K. Fidget widgets: designing for the physical margins of digital workspaces. In Proc. the 8th International Conference on TEI, ACM Press (2014), 301--304. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Kim, C. W. & Nam, T.-J. Talkative cushion: a phatic audio device to support family communication. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2009, ACM press (2009), 2631--2634. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Kim, Y. K., Row, Y. K., & Nam, T. J. Knoby: pet-like interactive door knob. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2012, ACM press (2012), 1685--1690. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Landin, H., Lundgren, S. & Prison, J. The iron horse: A sound ride. In Proc. Nordic CHI, ACM press (2002), 303--306. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Lee, C. H. J., Kim, K., Breazeal, C., & Picard, R. Shybot: friend-stranger interaction for children living with autism. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2012, ACM press (2008), 3375--3380. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Lee, J. H., Park, J. Y., & Nam, T. J. 2007. Emotional interaction through physical movement. In Proc. HCI Intelligent Multimodal Interaction Environments, Springer (2007), 401--410. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Ljungblad, S., &Holmquist, L. E. Transfer scenarios: grounding innovation with marginal practices. In Proc. CHI 2007, ACM Press (2007), 737--746. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Mahlke, S., Minge, M., &Thüring, M. Measuring multiple components of emotions in interactive contexts. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2006, ACM Press (2006), 1061--1066. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Marti, P., Pollini, A., Rullo, A. & Shibata, T. Engaging with artificial pets. In Proc. annual conference on European association of cognitive ergonomics, University of Athens (2005), 99--106. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Marti, S., Schmandt, C.(2005). Physical Embodiments for Mobile Communications Agents. In Proc. UIST 2005, ACM Press (2004), 231--240. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Melson, G. F., Kahn Jr, P. H., Beck, A. M., Friedman, B., Roberts, T., & Garrett, E. Robots as dogs?: children's interactions with the robotic dog AIBO and a live australian shepherd. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2005, ACM press (2005), 1649--1652. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Memoirs. Retrieved from: http://everyware.kr/home/portfolio/memoirs/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. MIDAS. http://cidr.kaist.ac.kr/mediawiki/index.php/MIDASGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Mori, M., MacDorman, K. F., &Kageki, N. The uncanny valley {from the field}. Robotics & Automation Magazine 19, 2 (2012), 98--100.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Nass, C., Moon, Y. Machines and Mindlessness: Social Responses to Computers. Journal of social issue physicals 25, 1 (2000), 81--103.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Screw by Andrew Neumann. Retrieved from: http://www.adneumann.com/ad.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Nittono, H., Fukushima, M., Yano, A., & Moriya, H. (2012). The power of kawaii: Viewing cute images promotes a careful behavior and narrows attentional focus. PloS one 7(9), (2012). e46362.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Norman, D. A. Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things. Basic Books, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Norman, D. A. Robots in the Home: What Might They Do? Interactions 12, 2 (2005), 65. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Oblinger, D. G., &Oblinger, J. (2005). Educating the Net Generation. EDUCAUSE Online book. Retrieved from: http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/pub7101.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Phuc, K. T., Racky, T., Roth, F., Wegmann, I., Pilz, M., Busch, C., &Söller-Eckert, C. COCO: the therapy robot. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2011, ACM press (2011) 1089--1094. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Picard, R. W. Affective computing, MIT press, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Potent objects. Retrieved from: http://vimeo.com/13111016Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Shibata, T., Wada, K., Saito, T., &Tanie, K. Human interactive robot for psychological enrichment and therapy. In Proc. AISB, 5 (2005), 98--109.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Stern, A. 12 Creating Emotional Relationships with Virtual Characters. Emotions in humans and artifacts, (2003). 233.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Sternberg, R. J. A triangular theory of love. Psychological review 93, 2 (1986), 119.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Strong, D. & Higgs, E. Borgmann's Philosophy of Technology, In Higgs, E. S., Light, A. and Strong, D. (Eds.) Technology and the Good Life? Chicago, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Suganuma, T., et al. Bridging the E-gaps: Towards Post-Ubiquitous Computing. In 20th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications (AINA), 2 (2006), 5. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Sung, J.-Y., Guo, L., Grinter, R. E. & Christensen, H. I. "My Roomba Is Rambo": Intimate Home Appliances. In Proc. Ubicomp 2007, Springer (2007), 145--162. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Swartz, L. Why people hate the paperclip: labels, appearance, behavior, and social responses to user interface agents, Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, 2003Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Text rain Of Camille Utterback. Retrieved from: http://vimeo.com/13141591Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Topál, J., Miklósi, Á., Gácsi, M., Dóka, A., Pongrácz, P.,...&Csányi, V. The dog as a model for understanding human social behavior. Advances in the Study of Animal Behavior 39, (2009). 71--116.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. van Allen, P., McVeigh-Schultz, J., Brown, B., Kim, H. M., & Lara, D., AniThings: animism and heterogeneous multiplicity. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2013, ACM press (2013), 2247--2256 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Veevers, J. E. The social meaning of pets: Alternative roles for companion animals. Marriage & Family Review 8, 3--4 (1985), 11--30.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  61. Venkatesh, V. Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model. Information System Research 11, 4 (2000), 342--365. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. Zhang, P., & Li, N.: The Importance of Affective Quality. Communications of the ACM 48, 9 (2005), 105--108. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J., &Evenson, S. Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. In Proc. CHI 2007, ACM Press (2007), 493--502. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. CAMY: applying a pet dog analogy to everyday ubicomp products

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      UbiComp '14: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing
      September 2014
      973 pages
      ISBN:9781450329682
      DOI:10.1145/2632048

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 13 September 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate764of2,912submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader