skip to main content
10.1145/2636582.2637347acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobihocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A comparison of OLSR and OSPF-MDR for large-scale airborne mobile ad-hoc networks

Published:11 August 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we compare the proactive MANET routing schemes of OLSR and OSPF-MDR via high-fidelity simulation, and consider their suitability for large-scale airborne networks. A successful MANET routing scheme must be bandwidth efficient and robust to frequent topology changes. To assess the two protocols, we simulate them in networks with up to 400 mobile nodes, under a variety of network densities. We evaluate them on the basis of the amount of routing overhead generated, the rate of successful packet delivery, and the time it takes until all of the routing tables converge. We find that OLSR requires up to an order magnitude higher router overhead than OSPF-MDR, while providing only a marginal benefit in packet delivery success rates. The largest difference between the two protocols is the time it takes for their routing tables to converge in the presence of packet loss. OLSR has consistent convergence times for networks of all sizes, while the convergence time of OSPF-MDR increases with network size.

References

  1. C. Wilson, "Network centric operations: Background and oversight issues for congress." Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC) Document, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. T. Clausen and P. Jaqcquet, "Optimized link state routing (olsr)," IETF RFC 3626, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. R. Ogier and P. Spagnolo, "Mobile ad hoc network (manet) extension of ospf using connected dominating set (cds) ooding," IETF RFC 5614, August, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. E. M. Royer and C.-K. Toh, "A review of current routing protocols for ad hoc mobile wireless networks," Personal Communications, IEEE, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 46--55, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. C. Mbarushimana and A. Shahrabi, "Comparative study of reactive and proactive routing protocols performance in mobile ad hoc networks," in Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops, 2007, vol. 2. IEEE, 2007, pp. 679--684. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. S. Ade and P. Tijare, "Performance comparison of aodv, dsdv, olsr and dsr routing protocols in mobile ad hoc networks," International Journal of Information Technology and Knowledge Management, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 545{548, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. A. K. BR, L. C. Reddy, and P. S. Hiremath, "Performance comparison of wireless mobile ad-hoc network routing protocols," IJCSNS, vol. 8, no. 6, p. 337, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. J. Fang, T. Go, and G. Pei, "Comparison studies of ospf-mdr, olsr and composite routing," in MILCOM 2010. IEEE, 2010, pp. 989--994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. B.-N. Cheng and S. Moore, "A comparison of manet routing protocols on airborne tactical networks," in MILCOM 2012. IEEE, 2012, pp. 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. O. M. Documentation, "Opnet technologies," Inc.{Internet} http://www. opnet. com, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. A. Qayyum, L. Viennot, and A. Laouiti, "Multipoint relaying for ooding broadcast messages in mobile wireless networks," in Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2002. HICSS., pp. 3866--3875. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. A comparison of OLSR and OSPF-MDR for large-scale airborne mobile ad-hoc networks

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          AIRBORNE '14: Proceedings of the third ACM workshop on Airborne networks and communications
          August 2014
          28 pages
          ISBN:9781450329859
          DOI:10.1145/2636582

          Copyright © 2014 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 11 August 2014

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          AIRBORNE '14 Paper Acceptance Rate2of3submissions,67%Overall Acceptance Rate7of8submissions,88%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader