skip to main content
10.1145/2637248.2637264acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesecceConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Flight Collision Avoidance System for Self-Separation

Published:01 September 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

In a Free Flight Environment, pilots are delegated the authority to choose the flight paths, maintain spatial separation and consider environmental conditions with minimum intervention from Air Traffic Controllers. These factors constitute new tasks for pilots, which otherwise would be performed by Air Traffic Control. To maintain separation of aircraft, pilots are reliant on spatial awareness in controlling basic flight parameters such as speed, heading and altitude.

References

  1. Sheridan, T.B. Human Factors Research Needs for NextGen-Airportal Safety. NASA/CR--2009-21537, (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Metzger, U. and Parasuraman R. The role of air traffic controller in future air traffic management: An empirical study of active control versus passive control. Human Factors 43, 4 (2001), 519--528.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. RTCA. Final report of the RTCA board of directors' select committee on free flight. RTCA, Inc., Washington, DC, USA, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Hoekstra, J. M., van Gent, R. N. H. W., & Ruigrok, R. C. J. (2002). Designing for safety: the `free flight' air traffic management concept. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 75(2), 215--232.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Hilburn, B., Parasuraman, R., Jha, P. and McGarry, K. Emerging human factors issues in future air traffic management. Center for Human Performance Research. (March 2006) http://www.chpr.nl/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Thomas, L.C. and Rantanen, E.M. Human factors issues in implementation of advanced aviation technologies: a case of false alerts and cockpit displays of traffic information. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 7, 5 (2006), 501--523.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Zingale, D. and Williems, B. Review of Aircraft Self-Spacing Concepts: Implications for Controller Display Requirements. Federal Aviation Administration. DOT/FAA/TC-TN-09/03 (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Van Dam, S.B., Mulder, M. and van Paassen, M.M. Ecological interface design of a tactical airborne separation assistance tool. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans 38, 6 (2008), 1221--1233. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Bach, R., Farrell, C. and Erzberger, H. An Algorithm for Level-Aircraft Conflict Resolution. NASA/CR-2009-214573 (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Andrews, J.W. A relative motion analysis of horizontal collision avoidance. Proceedings of the 15th Annual Symposium, Las Vegas, SAFE Association (1977).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Xu, X. and Rantanen, E.M. Effects of air traffic geometry on pilots' conflict detection with cockpit display of traffic information. Human Factors 49, 3 (2007), 358--375.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Bilimoria, K.D. A geometric optimization approach to aircraft conflict resolution. In Proc. AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit, Denver, CO (2000).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Chakravarthy, A., and Ghose, D. (1998). Obstacle avoidance in a dynamic environment: A collision cone approach. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans28, 5 (1998), 562--574. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Rasmussen, J. Skills, rules, and knowledge; signals, signs, and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics SMC-13, 3 (1983), 257--266.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Rasmussen, J., Petjersen, A.M. and Goodstein, L.P. Cognitive systems engineering. John Wiley, New York, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Vicente, K.J. Cognitive Work Analysis: Towards Safe, Productive, and Healthy Computer-based Work. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ. 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Higgins, P.G. Architecture and Interface Aspects of Scheduling Decision Support. In B. MacCarthy and John Wilson (Eds.) Human Performance in Planning and Scheduling. Taylor and Francis, (2001), 245--281.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Rasmussen, J. The role of hierarchical knowledge representation in decisionmaking and system management. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics SMC-15, 2 (1985), 234--243.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Naikar, N., Hopcroft, R. and Moylan, A. Work domain analysis: Theoretical concepts and methodology. Air Operations Division, DSTO, DSTO-TR-1665, Australia, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Vicente, K.J. and Rasmussen, J. Ecological interface design: theoretical foundations. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 22, 1992, 589--606,Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Amelink, M.H.J., van Paassen, M.M., Mulder, M. and Flach, J.M. Total Energy-Based Perspective Flight Path Display for Aircraft Guidance along Complex Approach Trajectories. In Proc. Twelfth International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, Dayton, OH, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Rasmussen, J. A cognitive engineering approach to the modeling of decision making and its organization in process control, emergency management, cad/cam, office systems, and library systems. In W.B. Rouse (Ed.) Advances in Man-Machine Systems Research, JAI Press, Connecticut, Vol. 4, 1986, 165--243.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Flight Collision Avoidance System for Self-Separation

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ECCE '14: Proceedings of the 2014 European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics
      September 2014
      191 pages
      ISBN:9781450328746
      DOI:10.1145/2637248

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 1 September 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate56of91submissions,62%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader