skip to main content
10.1145/2637248.2637270acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesecceConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The concept of "presence" used as a measure for ecological validity in driving simulators

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 September 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

The main contribution of this paper to the Cognitive Ergonomics field is to propose a new approach of the behavioral validity's assessment of driving simulators. In this paper, our ambition is to find a way of measuring "presence" to use it as a measure for ecological validity in driving simulators. The underlying assumption is that a person experiencing a strong sense of presence in the virtual environment will react in this environment as if it would be a real one. We propose to measure "presence" by measuring "attention" toward the driving task". Our objective is to demonstrate that the higher the subject's attention required by the primary driving task will be, the more the spatial presence will be felt. In the experiment we tried to vary "attention" by adding a dual task and by adding traffic and measure driving performance and subjective "presence" (MEC-SPQ; Measurement, Effects, Conditions-Spatial Presence Questionnaire). The main result is a lack of congruence between subjective and behavioral measures.

References

  1. Godley, S. T., Triggs, T. J. et Fildes, B. N. (2002). Driving simulator validation for speed research. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 34(5):589--600.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Johnson, M. J., Chahal, T., Stinchcombe, A., Mullen, N., Weaver, B. et Bedard, M. (2011). Physiological responses to simulated and on-road driving. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 81(3):203--208.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Nilsson, L., 1993. Behavioural research in an advanced driving simulator-experiences of the VTI system. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 37th AnnualGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Regenbrecht, H., & Schubert, T. (2002). Real and illusory interaction enhance presence in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 11, 425--434. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Reimer, B., D'Ambrosio, L. a., Coughlin, J. E., Kafrissen, M. E. et Biederman, J. (2006). Using selfreported data to assess the validity of driving simulation data. Behavior Research Methods, 38(2):314--324.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Schubert, T. (2004). The sense of presence in virtual environments: A three-component scale measuring spatial presence, involvement, and realness. Zeitschrift für Medienpsychologie, 15, 69--71Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Slater, M., Lotto, B., Arnold, M. M. et Sanchez-Vives, M. V. (2009). How we experience immersive virtual environments: the concept of presence and its measurement. Anuario de Psicologia, 40(2):193--210. Meeting 37 (1), 612--616.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Slater, M. (1999). Measuring presence: A response to the Witmer and Singer presence questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 8, 560--565. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Tichon, J. G. (2007). Using presence to improve a virtual training environment. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10(6):781--787.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Vorderer, P, Wirth, W., Gouveia, F. R., F., Saari, T., Jäncke, F., Böcking, S., Schramm, H., Gysbers, A., Hartmann, T., Klimmt, C., Laarni, J., Ravaja, N., Sacau, A., baumgartner, T. & Jääncke, P. (2004). MEC Spatial Presence Questionnaire (MEC-SPQ):Short Documentation and Instructions for Application. Report to the European Community, Project Presence: MEC (IST-2001-37661)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Wirth, W., Hartmann, T., Bocking, S., Vorderer, P., Klimmt, C., Schramm, H., Saari, T., Laarni, J., Ravaja, N., Gouveia, F.R., et al. (2007). A process model of the formation of spatial presence experiences. Media Psychology, 9(3):493--525.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Wittmann, M., Kiss, M., Gugg, P., Steffen, A., Fink, M., Poppel, E., Kamiya, H., 2006. Effects of display location of a visual in-vehicle task on simulated driving. Appl. Ergon. 37, 187--199.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. The concept of "presence" used as a measure for ecological validity in driving simulators

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ECCE '14: Proceedings of the 2014 European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics
      September 2014
      191 pages
      ISBN:9781450328746
      DOI:10.1145/2637248

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 1 September 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate56of91submissions,62%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader