skip to main content
10.1145/2637748.2638416acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesi-knowConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Measuring context relevance for adaptive semantics visualizations

Published:16 September 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Semantics visualizations enable the acquisition of information to amplify the acquisition of knowledge. The dramatic increase of semantics in form of Linked Data and Linked-Open Data yield search databases that allow to visualize the entire context of search results. The visualization of this semantic context enables one to gather more information at once, but the complex structures may as well confuse and frustrate users. To overcome the problems, adaptive visualizations already provide some useful methods to adapt the visualization on users' demands and skills. Although these methods are very promising, these systems do not investigate the relevance of semantic neighboring entities that commonly build most information value. We introduce two new measurements for the relevance of neighboring entities: The Inverse Instance Frequency allows weighting the relevance of semantic concepts based on the number of their instances. The Direct Relation Frequency inverse Relations Frequency measures the relevance of neighboring instances by the type of semantic relations. Both measurements provide a weighting of neighboring entities of a selected semantic instance, and enable an adaptation of retinal variables for the visualized graph. The algorithms can easily be integrated into adaptive visualizations and enhance them with the relevance measurement of neighboring semantic entities. We give a detailed description of the algorithms to enable a replication for the adaptive and semantics visualization community. With our method, one can now easily derive the relevance of neighboring semantic entities of selected instances, and thus gain more information at once, without confusing and frustrating users.

References

  1. J.-W. Ahn. Adaptive Visualization for Focused Personalized Information Retrieval. PhD thesis, School of Information Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. J.-W. Ahn and P. Brusilovsky. Adaptive visualization of search results: Bringing user models to visual analytics. Information Visualization, 8(8 (3)):180--196, September 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. J.-W. Ahn and P. Brusilovsky. Adaptive visualization for exploratory information retrieval. Information Processing & Management, 49(5):1139--1164, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. J. Bertin. Semiology of graphics. University of Wisconsin Press, 1983. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. S. K. Card, J. D. Mackinlay, and B. Shneiderman. Readings in Information Visualization: Using Vision to Think. Morgan Kaufmann, 1. edition, February 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. I. da Silva, G. Santucci, and C. del Sasso Freitas. Ontology Visualization: One Size Does Not Fit All. In EuroVA 2012: International Workshop on Visual Analytics, pages 91--95. Eurographics Association, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. M. Golemati, C. Halatsis, C. Vassilakis, A. Katifori, and G. Lepouras. A context-based adaptive visualization environment. In Proceedings of the conference on Information Visualization, IV '06, pages 62--67, Washington, DC, USA, 2006. IEEE Computer Society. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. M. Golemati, C. Vassilakis, A. Katifori, G. Lepouras, and C. Halatsis. Context and adaptivity-driven visualization method selection. In C. Mourlas and P. Germanakos, editors, Intelligent User Interfaces: Adaptation and Personalization Systems and Technologies, pages 188--204. IGI Global, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. D. Gotz, Z. When, J. Lu, P. Kissa, N. Cao, W. H. Qian, S. X. Liu, and M. X. Zhou. Harvest: An intelligent visual analytic tool for the masses. In Proceedings of the first international workshop on Intelligent visual interfaces for text analysis, IVITA '10, pages 1--4, New York, NY, USA, 2010. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. D. A. Keim. Information visualization and visual data mining. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 8(1):1--8, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. T. Liebig, O. Noppens, and F. von Henke. Viscover: Visualizing, exploring, and analysing structured data. In Visual Analytics Science and Technology, 2009. VAST 2009. IEEE Symposium on, pages --, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. V. Lopez, A. Nikolov, M. Sabou, V. Uren, E. Motta, and M. d'Aquin. Scaling up question-answering to linked data. In P. Cimiano and H. Pinto, editors, Knowledge Engineering and Management by the Masses, volume 6317 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 193--210. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. V. Lopez, V. Uren, M. Sabou, and E. Motta. Is question answering fit for the semantic web?: a survey. Semant. web, 2(2):125--155, Apr. 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. J. Mackinlay. Automating the design of graphical presentations of relational information. ACM Trans. Graph., 5:110--141, April 1986. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. J. Mackinlay, P. Hanrahan, and C. Stolte. Show me: Automatic presentation for visual analysis. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 13(6):1137--1144, Nov. 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. G. Marchionini. Exploratory search: from finding to understanding. Commun. ACM, 49(4):41--46, Apr. 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. E. Motta, P. Mulholland, S. Peroni, M. d' Aquin, J. M. Gomez-Perez, V. Mendez, and F. Zablith. A novel approach to visualizing and navigating ontologies. In L. Aroyo, C. Welty, H. Alani, J. Taylor, A. Bernstein, L. Kagal, N. Noy, and E. Blomqvist, editors, The Semantic Web at ISWC 2011, volume 7031 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 470--486. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. K. Nazemi, M. Breyer, J. Forster, D. Burkhardt, and A. Kuijper. Interacting with semantics: A user-centered visualization adaptation based on semantics data. Human Interface and the Management of Information. Interacting with Information, pages 239--248, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. K. Nazemi and J. Kohlhammer. Visual variables in adaptive visualizations. In 1st International Workshop on User-Adaptive Visualization (WUAV 2013). Extended Proceedings of UMAP 2013., volume 997 of CEUR Workshop Proceedings. ISSN 1613--0073., 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. K. Nazemi, R. Retz, J. Bernard, J. Kohlhammer, and D. Fellner. Adaptive semantic visualization for bibliographic entries. In G. Bebis, R. Boyle, B. Parvin, D. Koracin, B. Li, F. Porikli, V. Zordan, J. Klosowski, S. Coquillart, X. Luo, M. Chen, and D. Gotz, editors, Advances in Visual Computing, volume 8034 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 13--24. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. K. Nazemi, C. Stab, and A. Kuijper. A reference model for adaptive visualization systems. In J. Jacko, editor, Human-Computer Interaction. Design and Development Approaches, volume 6761 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 480--489. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. J. Samper, V. Tomas, E. Carrillo, and R. do P. C. Nascimento. Visualization of ontologies to specify semantic descriptions of services. Knowledge and Data Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, 20(1):130--134, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. L. Shi, N. Cao, S. Liu, W. Qian, L. Tan, G. Wang, J. Sun, and C.-Y. Lin. Himap: Adaptive visualization of large-scale online social networks. In Visualization Symposium, 2009. PacificVis '09. IEEE Pacific, pages 41--48, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. B. Shneiderman. The eyes have it: A task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations. In VL, pages 336--343, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. C. Stab, K. Nazemi, M. Breyer, D. Burkhardt, and J. Kohlhammer. Semantics visualization for fostering search result comprehension. In E. Simperl, P. Cimiano, A. Polleres, O. Corcho, and V. Presutti, editors, The Semantic Web: Research and Applications, volume 7295 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 633--646. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. B. Steichen, G. Carenini, and C. Conati. User-adaptive information visualization: using eye gaze data to infer visualization tasks and user cognitive abilities. In Proceedings of the 2013 international conference on Intelligent user interfaces, IUI '13, pages 317--328, New York, NY, USA, 2013. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. I. Torre. Adaptive systems in the era of the semantic and social web, a survey. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 19(5):433--486, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. M. Tory and T. Möller. Rethinking visualization: A high-level taxonomy. In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, INFOVIS '04, pages 151--158, Washington, DC, USA, 2004. IEEE Computer Society. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. A. M. Treisman and G. Gelade. A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12:1:97--136, 1980.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. M. Voigt, S. Pietschmann, and K. Meissner. A Semantics-Based, End-User-Centered Information Visualization Process for Semantic Web Data. In T. Hussein, H. Paulheim, S. Lukosch, J. Ziegler, and G. Calvary, editors, Semantic Models for Adaptive Interactive Systems, Human (at) Computer Interaction Series, pages 83--107. Springer London, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. R. W. White and R. A. Roth. Exploratory Search: Beyond the Query-Response Paradigm, volume 1 of Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval, and Services. G. Marchionini (Ed). Morgan & Claypool Publishers, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. J. M. Wolfe. Guided search 4.0: Current progress with a model of visual search. W. Gray (Ed.), Integrated Models of Cognitive Systems, pages 99--119, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Measuring context relevance for adaptive semantics visualizations

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        i-KNOW '14: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Knowledge Technologies and Data-driven Business
        September 2014
        262 pages
        ISBN:9781450327695
        DOI:10.1145/2637748

        Copyright © 2014 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 16 September 2014

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        i-KNOW '14 Paper Acceptance Rate25of73submissions,34%Overall Acceptance Rate77of238submissions,32%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader