skip to main content
10.1145/2638728.2641306acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesubicompConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Limitations with activity recognition methodology & data sets

Published:13 September 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Human activity recognition (AR) has begun to mature as a field, but for AR research to thrive, large, diverse, high quality, AR data sets must be publically available and AR methodology must be clearly documented and standardized. In the process of comparing our AR research to other efforts, however, we found that most AR data sets are sufficiently limited as to impact the reliability of existing research results, and that many AR research papers do not clearly document their experimental methodology and often make unrealistic assumptions. In this paper we outline problems and limitations with AR data sets and describe the methodology problems we noticed, in the hope that this will lead to the creation of improved and better documented data sets and improved AR experimental methodology. Although we cover a broad array of methodological issues, our primary focus is on an often overlooked factor, model type, which determines how AR training and test data are partitioned---and how AR models are evaluated. Our prior research indicates that personal, hybrid, and impersonal/universal models yield dramatically different performance [30], yet many research studies do not highlight or even identify this factor. We make concrete recommendations to address these issues and also describe our own publically available AR data sets.

References

  1. actitracker.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Abdallah, Z. S., Gaber, M. M., Srinivasan, B., and Krishnaswamy, S. CBARS: Cluster based classification for activity recognition systems. In Proc. 1st Int. Conference on Advances Machine Learning Technologies (2012).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Abdallah, Z. S., Gaber, M. M., Srinivasan, B., and Krishnaswamy, S., StreamAR: incremental and active learning with evolving sensory data for activity recognition. In Proc. 24th IEEE Int. Conf. on Tools with AI (2012). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Anguita, D., Ghio, A., Oneto, L., Parra, X., and Reyes-Ortiz, J. Human activity recognition on smartphones using a multiclass hardware-friendly support vector machine. In Proc. Int. Workshop of Ambient Assisted Living (2012). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Anguita, D., Ghio, A., Oneto, L., Parra, X., and Reyes-Ortiz, J. L. A public domain dataset for human activity recognition using smartphones. In Proc. European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks, Comp. Intelligence, and Machine Learning (2013), 437--442.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Anguita, D., Ghio, A., Oneto, L., Parra, X., and Reyes-Ortiz, J. L. Energy efficient smartphone-based activity recognition using fixed-point arithmatic, Journal of Universal Comp. Science, 19, 9 (2013), 1295--1314.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Bao, L., and Intille, S. Activity recognition from user-annotated acceleration data. Lecture Notes Computer Science 3001 (2004), 1--17.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Brezmes, T., Gorricho, J. L., and Cotrina, J. Activity recognition from accelerometer data on mobile phones. In Proc. 10th International Work-Conference on Artificial Neural Networks (2009), 796--799. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Cho, Y., Nam, Y., Choi, Y-J, and Cho, W-D. Smart-Buckle: human activity recognition using a 3-axis accelerometer and wearable camera. HealthNet (2008). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Derawi, M., and Bours, P. Gait and activity recognition using commercial phones. Computers and Security, 39 (2013): 137--144. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Dernbach, S., Das, B., Krishnan, N. C., Thomas, B. L., and Cook, D. J. Simple and complex activity recognition through smart phones. In Proc. 8th Int. Conference on Intelligent Environments (2012), 214--221. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Do, T. M., Loke, S. W., and Liu, F. HealthyLife: An activity recognition system with smartphone using logic-based stream reasoning. Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Computing, Networking, and Services, Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, 120 (2013), 188--199.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Fahim, M. Evolutionary learning models for indoor and outdoor human activity recognition. PhD Thesis, Kyung Hee University (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Fahim, M., Fatima, I., and Lee, S. EFM: Evolutionary fuzzy model for dynamic activities recognition using a smartphone accelerometer. Applied Intelligence, 39, 3, (2013), 475--488. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Gomes, J. B., Krishnaswamy S., Gaber, M. M., Sousa, A. C., and Menasalvas, E. Mobile activity recognition using ubiquitous data stream mining. In Proc. 14th Int. Conf. on Data Warehousing and Knowledge Discovery (2012). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Gyorbiro, N., Fabian, A., and Homanyi, G. An activity recognition system for mobile phones. Mobile Networks and Applications 14, 1 (2008), 82--91. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. M. Han, An intergativ Human Activity Recognition Framework based on Smartphone Multimodal Sensors, Doctoral Thesis, Kyung Hee University, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Han, M., Bang, J-H, Nugent, C., McClean, S., and Lee, S. HARF: A hierarchical activity recognition framework using smartphone sensors, Ubiquitous Computing and Ambient Intelligence, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 8276 (2013), 159--166.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. He, Z., and Jin, L. Activity recognition from acceleration data based on discrete cosine transform and SVM. In. Proc. IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. He, Y., and Li, Y. Physical activity recognition utilizing the built-in kinematic sensors of a smartphone. Int. Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks (2013).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Kastner, M., Strickert, M., and Villmann, T. A sparse kernelized matrix learning vector quantization model for human activity recognition. In Proc. European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks, Comp. Intelligence, and Machine Learning (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Kawaguchi, N., et al. HASC Challenge: gathering large scale human activity corpus for the real-world activity understandings. In Proc. 2nd Augmented Human International Conference (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Khan, A. M., Lee, Y. K., Lee, S. Y., and Kim, T. S. Human activity recognition via an accelerometer-enabled-smartphone using kernel discriminant analysis. In Proc. 5th Int. Conf. on Future Information Technology (2010), 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Khan, A. M., Siddiqi, M. H., and Lee, S-W. Exploratory data analysis of acceleration signals to select light-weight and accurate features for real-time activity recognition on smartphones. Sensors 13 (2013), 13099--13122.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Kwapisz, J. R., Weiss, G. M., and Moore, S. A. Activity recognition using cell phone accelerometers, SIGKDD Explorations, 12 2 (2010), 74--82. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Lane, N. D., Xu, Y., Lu, H., Hu, S., Choudhury, T., Campbell, A. T., and Zhao, F., Enabling large-scale human activity inference on smartphones using community similarity networks (CSN). In Proc. 13th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (2011), 355--364. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Lane, N. D., Xu, Y., Lu, H. Hu, S., Choudhury, T. Campbell, A. T., and Zhao, F. Community similarity networks. Personal Ubiquitous Computing, 18, 2 (2014), 355--358. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Lee, Y., and Cho, S. Activity recognition using hierarchical hidden Markov models on a smartphone with 3D accelerometer. In Proc. 6th Int. Conf. on Hybrid Artificial Intelligent Systems (2011), 460--467. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Lee, Y., and Cho, S. Activity recognition with Android phone using mixture-of-experts co-trained with labeled and unlabeled data. Neurocomputing, 126 (2014), 106--115. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Lockhart, J. W., and Weiss, G. M. The benefits of personalized smartphone-based activity recognition models. In Proc. SIAM International Conference on Data Mining (SDM) (2014), 614--622.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Lockhart, J. W. The Benefits of Personalized Data Mining Approaches to Human Activity Recognition with Smartphone Sensor Data. Master's Thesis, Dept. of Computer & Info. Science, Fordham University (2014). {http://www.cis.fordham.edu/wisdm/Lockhart-MS-thesis.pdf}Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Miluzzo, E., Lane, N. D., Fodor, K., Peterson, R., Lu, H., Musolesi, M., Eisenman, S. B., Zheng, X., and Campbell, A. T. Sensing meets mobile social networks: the design, implementation and evaluation of the CenceMe application. In Proc. 6th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (2008), 337--350. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Qi, X. Keally, M., Zhou, G., Li, Y., Ren, Z. AdaSense: adapting sampling rates for activity recognition in body sensor networks. In Proc. IEEE 19th Real-Time and Embedded Technology and Applications Symposium (2013), 163--172. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Reiss, A., Hendeby, G., and Stricker, D. A competitive approach for human activity recognition on smartphones. In Proc. European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks, Computational Intelligence, and Machine Learning (2013), 455--460.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Riboni, D., and Bettini, C. COSAR: hybrid reasoning for context-aware activity recognition. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 15, 3 (2011), 271--289. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Roggen, D. et al. Opportunity: towards opportunistic activity and context recognition systems. In Proc. 3rd IEEE Workshop on Autononomic and Opportunistic Communications (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Roy, N., Misra, A., and Cook, D. Infrastructure-assisted smartphone-based ADL recognition in multi-Inhabitant smart environments. In Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Pervasive Computing and Communications (2013), 38--46.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Shoaib, M., Scholten, H., and Havinga, P. J. M. Towards physical activity recognition using smartphone sensors. In Proc. 10th International Conference on Ubiquitous Intelligence & Computing (2013), 80--87. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Siirtola, P., and Roning, J. Ready-to-use activity recognition for smartphones, In Proc. IEEE Symposium on Comp. Intelligence and Data Mining (2013), 59--64.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Tapia, E., Intille, S., Haskell, W., Larson, K., Wright, J., King, A., and Friedman, R. Real-time recognition of physical activities and their intensities using wireless accelerometers and a heart rate monitor. In Proc. 11th IEEE Int. Symp. on Wearable Computers (2007), 37--40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. www.cis.fordham.edu/wisdm/dataset.phpGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Wu, W., Dasgupta, S., Ramirez, E. E., Peterson, C., and Norman, G. J. Classification accuracies of physical activities using smartphone motion sensors. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 14, 5 (2012).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Yan, Z., Chakraborty, D., Mittal, S., Misra, A., and Aberer, K. An exploration with online complex activity recognition using cellphone accelerometer. UbiComp Adjunct (2013), 199--202. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Yang, J. Toward physical activity diary: motion recognition using simple acceleration features with mobile phones. In Proc. 1st Int. Workshop on Interactive Multimedia for Consumer Electronics (2009). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Yuan, B., Herbert, J., and Emamian, Y. Smartphone-based activity recognition using hybrid classifier utilizing cloud infrastructure for data analysis. In Proc. of the 4th Int. Conference on Pervasive and Embedded Computing & Comm. Systems. 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Limitations with activity recognition methodology & data sets

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        UbiComp '14 Adjunct: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: Adjunct Publication
        September 2014
        1409 pages
        ISBN:9781450330473
        DOI:10.1145/2638728

        Copyright © 2014 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 13 September 2014

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate764of2,912submissions,26%

        Upcoming Conference

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader