skip to main content
10.1145/2641798.2641816acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmswimConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Imputing missing values in sensor networks using sparse data representations

Authors Info & Claims
Published:21 September 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Sensor networks are increasingly being used to provide timely information about the physical, urban and human environment. Algorithms that depend on sensor data often assume that the readings are complete. However, node failures or communication breakdowns result in missing data entries, preventing the use of such algorithms. To impute these missing values, we propose a method of exploiting spatial correlations which is based on the sparse autoencoder and inspired by the conditional Restricted Boltzmann Machine that contested for the Netflix Prize. We modify the autoencoder to cope with missing data, and test it on data from a sensor testbed in Santander, Spain. We show that our algorithm extracts features from datasets with high proportions of missing data and uses these features to accurately and efficiently impute missing entries.

References

  1. G. E. Hinton, N. Srivastava, A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, and R. R. Salakhutdinov. Improving neural networks by preventing co-adaptation of feature detectors. arXiv preprint arXiv:1207.0580, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. L. Kong, M. Xia, X.-Y. Liu, M.-Y. Wu, and X. Liu. Data loss and reconstruction in sensor networks. In INFOCOM, 2013 Proceedings IEEE, pages 1654--1662. IEEE, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. A. Ng. Sparse autoencoder. CS294A Lecture notes, page 72, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. L. Pan and J. Li. K-nearest neighbor based missing data estimation algorithm in wireless sensor networks. Wireless Sensor Network, 2(2), 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. D. E. Rumelhart, G. E. Hinton, and R. J. Williams. Learning internal representations by error propagation. Technical report, DTIC Document, 1985.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. R. Salakhutdinov, A. Mnih, and G. Hinton. Restricted Boltzmann machines for collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 24th international conference on Machine learning, pages 791--798. ACM, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. L. Sanchez, J. A. Galache, V. Gutierrez, J. Hernandez, J. Bernat, A. Gluhak, and T. Garcia. SmartSantander: The meeting point between future internet research and experimentation and the smart cities. In Future Network & Mobile Summit (FutureNetw), 2011, pages 1--8. IEEE, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. P. K. Sharpe and R. Solly. Dealing with missing values in neural network-based diagnostic systems. Neural Computing & Applications, 3(2):73--77, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. P. Vamplew and A. Adams. Missing values in a backpropagation neural net. In Proceedings of the 3rd. Australian Conference on Neural Networks (ACNN), I, pages 64--66, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. L. Wan, M. Zeiler, S. Zhang, Y. L. Cun, and R. Fergus. Regularization of neural networks using DropConnect. In Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-13), pages 1058--1066, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Imputing missing values in sensor networks using sparse data representations

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        MSWiM '14: Proceedings of the 17th ACM international conference on Modeling, analysis and simulation of wireless and mobile systems
        September 2014
        352 pages
        ISBN:9781450330305
        DOI:10.1145/2641798

        Copyright © 2014 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 21 September 2014

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        MSWiM '14 Paper Acceptance Rate32of128submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate398of1,577submissions,25%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader