skip to main content
10.1145/2642687.2642695acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmswimConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Quality of service differentiation for smart grid neighbor area networks through multiple RPL instances

Published:21 September 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

The Smart Grid (SG) optimizes the existing power grid with a reliable and secure SG Communications Network. For uplink data traffic, the Neighbor Area Network (NAN) segment's size and converge-cast traffic can be addressed with the Routing Protocol for Low Power and Lossy Networks (RPL). Additionally, a broad range of SG applications, such as monitoring, control and automation applications, have been proposed in order to achieve the anticipated SG goals. These applications, each possessing different Quality of Service (QoS) requirements such as bandwidth, latency, reliability and security, will require traffic prioritization and differentiation. Generally, QoS is addressed through queue scheduling mechanisms or prioritized channel access at the Medium Access Control (MAC) layer. In this paper, extensions to the standard MAC level QoS techniques are explored with an emphasis on network layer QoS mechanisms. Specifically, the effectiveness of multiple instances of the RPL network graph, built upon differing objective functions, for QoS differentiation is investigated. To that effect, three variants of RPL, standard RPL, multi-instance RPL (RPL-M) and multi-instance RPL with prioritized channel backoffs (RPL-M+) along with two distinct traffic classes have been examined as data traffic rate and composition was varied.

References

  1. Part 11: Wireless LAN medium access control (MAC) and physical layer (PHY) specifications, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Communications requirements of smart grid technologies. Technical report, US's Department of Energy, oct 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Nist priority action plan 2 - guidelines for assessing wireless standards for smart grid applications, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. I. Al-Anbagi. Quality of service for wireless sensor networks in smart grid applications. Master's thesis, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. K. C. Budka, J. G. Deshpande, T. L. Doumi, M. Madden, and T. Mew. Communication network architecture and design principles for smart grids. Technical report, Alcatel-Lucent, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. F. Cohen. The smarter grid. IEEE Security & Privacy, 8(1):60--63, Jan. 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. J. G. Deshpande, E. Kim, , and M. Thottan. Differentiated services QoS in smart grid communication networks. Technical report, Alcatel-Lucent, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Y. Gobena et al. Practical architecture considerations for smart grid WAN network. In Proc. Power Systems Conference and Exposition (IEEE/PES), pages 1--6, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. V. Gungor et al. A survey on smart grid potential applications and communication requirements. Industrial Informatics, IEEE Transactions on, 9(1):28--42, feb. 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Q.-D. Ho, Y. Gao, and T. Le-Ngoc. Challenges and research opportunities in wireless communications networks for smart grid. In IEEE Wireless Communications, pages 89--95, Jun 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Q.-D. Ho, Y. Gao, G. Rajalingham, and T. Le-Ngoc. Performance and applicability of candidate protocols for smart grid's wireless mesh neighbor-area networks. In 2014 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), Sydney, Australia, June 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Q.-D. Ho and T. Le-Ngoc. Smart grid communications networks: Wireless technologies, protocols, issues and standards. Elsevier, Summer 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. P. Kulkarni et al. A self-organising mesh networking solution based on enhanced RPL for smart metering communications. In Proc. IEEE International Symposium on a World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks (WoWMoM), pages 1--6, June 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. B. Lichtensteiger et al. RF mesh system for smart metering: System architecture and performance. In Proc. IEEE Smart Grid Communication, pages 379--384, Mayland, USA, Oct. 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. N. T. Long, M.-P. Uwase, J. Tiberghien, and K. Steenhaut. QoS-aware cross-layer mechanism for multiple instances RPL. In 2013 International Conference on Advanced Technologies for Communications (ATC'13), Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, October 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. P. Thai. Packet-level QoS over RPL: Routing protocol for low-power and lossy networks. Master's thesis, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. D. Wang et al. RPL based routing for advanced metering infrastructure in smart grid. Technical Report TR2010-053, Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, July 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Quality of service differentiation for smart grid neighbor area networks through multiple RPL instances

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          Q2SWinet '14: Proceedings of the 10th ACM symposium on QoS and security for wireless and mobile networks
          September 2014
          146 pages
          ISBN:9781450330275
          DOI:10.1145/2642687

          Copyright © 2014 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 21 September 2014

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Q2SWinet '14 Paper Acceptance Rate14of30submissions,47%Overall Acceptance Rate46of131submissions,35%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader