skip to main content
10.1145/2642918.2647352acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesuistConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Pinch-to-zoom-plus: an enhanced pinch-to-zoom that reduces clutching and panning

Published:05 October 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Despite its popularity, the classic pinch-to-zoom gesture used in modern multi-touch interfaces has drawbacks: specifically, the need to support an extended range of scales and the need to keep content within the view window on the display can result in the need to clutch and pan. In two formative studies of unimanual and bimanual pinch-to-zoom, we found patterns: zooming actions follows a predictable ballistic velocity curve, and users tend to pan the point-of-interest towards the center of the screen. We apply these results to design an enhanced zooming technique called Pinch-to-Zoom-Plus (PZP) that reduces clutching and panning operations compared to standard pinch-to-zoom behaviour.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

uistf1099-file3.mp4

mp4

56.3 MB

References

  1. Albinsson, P.A. and Zhai, S. High precision touch screen interaction. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2003). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Buxton, B. Multi-touch systems that i have known and loved. Microsoft Research, (2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Casiez, G., Vogel, D., Balakrishnan, R., and Cockburn, A. The Impact of Control-Display Gain on User Performance in Pointing Tasks. Human-Computer Interaction 23, 3 (2008), 215.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Cockburn, A., Karlson, A., and Bederson, B.B. A review of overview+ detail, zooming, and focus+ context interfaces. ACM Computing Surveys 41, 1 (2008), 2. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Flash, T. and Hogan, N. The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model. The journal of Neuroscience, (1985).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Forlines, C. and Shen, C. DTLens: multi-user tabletop spatial data exploration. UIST'05, (2005), 119. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Hinckley, K. and Song, H. Sensor synaesthesia. CHI '11 (2011), 801.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Hinckley, K., Cutrell, E., Bathiche, S., and Muss, T. Quantitative analysis of scrolling techniques. CHI '02 (2002). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Hinckley, K., Czerwinski, M., and Sinclair, M. Interaction and modeling techniques for desktop two-handed input. UIST '98, (1998), 49. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Hoggan, E., Nacenta, M., Kristensson, P.O., Williamson, J., Oulasvirta, A., Lehtiö, A. Multi-touch pinch gestures: performance and ergonomics. ITS '13 (2013), 219. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Jellinek, H.D. and Card, S.K. Powermice and user performance. CHI '90 (1990). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Käser, D.P., Agrawala, M., and Pauly, M. FingerGlass: Efficient multiscale interaction on multitouch screens. Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference on Human factors in computing systems (2011), 1601. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Lank, E. and Phan, S. Focus+Context sketching on a pocket PC. CHI EA '04 (2004). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Malacria, S., Lecolinet, E., and Guiard, Y. Clutch-free panning and integrated pan-zoom control on touchsensitive surfaces: the cyclostar approach. CHI '10 (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Negulescu, M., Ruiz, J., and Lank, E. ZoomPointing revisited: supporting mixed-resolution gesturing on interactive surfaces. ITS '11 (2011), 150. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Sears, A. and Shneiderman, B. High precision touchscreens: design strategies and comparisons with a mouse. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 34, 4 (1991), 593. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Tran, J.J., Trewin, S., Swart, C., John, B.E., and Thomas, J.C. Exploring pinch and spread gestures on mobile devices. MobileHCI '13 (2013), 151. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Wellner, P. The DigitalDesk calculator: tangible manipulation on a desk top display. UIST '91, (1991), 27. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Wellner, P. Digital Desk. (1991).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Pinch-to-zoom-plus: an enhanced pinch-to-zoom that reduces clutching and panning

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      UIST '14: Proceedings of the 27th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology
      October 2014
      722 pages
      ISBN:9781450330695
      DOI:10.1145/2642918

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 5 October 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      UIST '14 Paper Acceptance Rate74of333submissions,22%Overall Acceptance Rate842of3,967submissions,21%

      Upcoming Conference

      UIST '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader