skip to main content
10.1145/2642918.2647386acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesuistConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Crowd-powered parameter analysis for visual design exploration

Published:05 October 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Parameter tweaking is one of the fundamental tasks in the editing of visual digital contents, such as correcting photo color or executing blendshape facial expression control. A problem with parameter tweaking is that it often requires much time and effort to explore a high-dimensional parameter space. We present a new technique to analyze such high-dimensional parameter space to obtain a distribution of human preference. Our method uses crowdsourcing to gather pairwise comparisons between various parameter sets. As a result of analysis, the user obtains a goodness function that computes the goodness value of a given parameter set. This goodness function enables two interfaces for exploration: Smart Suggestion, which provides suggestions of preferable parameter sets, and VisOpt Slider, which interactively visualizes the distribution of goodness values on sliders and gently optimizes slider values while the user is editing. We created four applications with different design parameter spaces. As a result, the system could facilitate the user's design exploration.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

uistf3111-file3.mp4

mp4

28.3 MB

References

  1. Agrawal, S., Shen, S., and van de Panne, M. Diverse motion variations for physics-based character animation. In Proc. SCA '13, ACM (2013), 37--44. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bangor, A., Kortum, P. T., and Miller, J. T. An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Int. 24, 6 (2008), 574--594.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Bishop, C. M. Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition. Oxford University Press, Inc., 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Carr, J. C., Beatson, R. K., Cherrie, J. B., Mitchell, T. J., Fright, W. R., McCallum, B. C., and Evans, T. R. Reconstruction and representation of 3d objects with radial basis functions. In Proc. SIGGRAPH '01, ACM (2001), 67--76. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Chaudhuri, S., Kalogerakis, E., Giguere, S., and Funkhouser, T. Attribit: Content creation with semantic attributes. In Proc. UIST '13, ACM (2013), 193--202. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Gingold, Y., Shamir, A., and Cohen-Or, D. Micro perceptual human computation for visual tasks. ACM Trans. Graph. 31, 5 (2012), 119:1--119:12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Hartmann, B., Yu, L., Allison, A., Yang, Y., and Klemmer, S. R. Design as exploration: Creating interface alternatives through parallel authoring and runtime tuning. In Proc. UIST '08, ACM (2008), 91--100. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Kajino, H., Tsuboi, Y., and Kashima, H. Clustering crowds. In Proc. AAAI '13 (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Lee, B., Srivastava, S., Kumar, R., Brafman, R., and Klemmer, S. R. Designing with interactive example galleries. In Proc. CHI '10, ACM (2010), 2257--2266. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Lewis, J. P., Anjyo, K., Rhee, T., Zhang, M., Pighin, F., and Deng, Z. Practice and theory of blendshape facial models. In EG 2014 STARs, Eurographics Association (2014), 199--218.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Marks, J., Andalman, B., Beardsley, P. A., Freeman, W., Gibson, S., Hodgins, J., Kang, T., Mirtich, B., Pfister, H., Ruml, W., Ryall, K., Seims, J., and Shieber, S. Design galleries: A general approach to setting parameters for computer graphics and animation. In Proc. SIGGRAPH '97, ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co. (1997), 389--400. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Ngan, A., Durand, F., and Matusik, W. Image-driven navigation of analytical brdf models. In Proc. EGSR '06, Eurographics Association (2006), 399--407. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Okabe, M., Matsushita, Y., Shen, L., and Igarashi, T. Illumination brush: Interactive design of all-frequency lighting. In Proc. Pacific Graphics '07 (2007), 171--180. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Prevost, R., Whiting, E., Lefebvre, S., and Sorkine-Hornung, O. Make it stand: Balancing shapes for 3d fabrication. ACM Trans. Graph. 32, 4 (2013), 81:1--81:10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Quinn, A. J., and Bederson, B. B. Human computation: A survey and taxonomy of a growing field. In Proc. CHI '11, ACM (2011), 1403--1412. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Reinecke, K., and Gajos, K. Z. Quantifying visual preferences around the world. In Proc. CHI '14, ACM (2014), 11--20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Reinecke, K., Yeh, T., Miratrix, L., Mardiko, R., Zhao, Y., Liu, J., and Gajos, K. Z. Predicting users' first impressions of website aesthetics with a quantification of perceived visual complexity and colorfulness. In Proc. CHI '13, ACM (2013), 2049--2058. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Sagar, M. Facial performance capture and expressive translation for king kong. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2006 Sketches, ACM (2006). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Secord, A., Lu, J., finkelstein, A., Singh, M., and Nealen, A. Perceptual models of viewpoint preference. ACM Trans. Graph. 30, 5 (2011), 109:1--109:12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Shapira, L., Shamir, A., and Cohen-Or, D. Image appearance exploration by model-based navigation. Comput. Graph. Forum 28, 2 (2009), 629--638.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Sorkine, O. Differential representations for mesh processing. Comput. Graph. Forum 25, 4 (2006), 789--807.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Sykora, D., Sedlacek, D., Jinchao, S., Dingliana, J., and Collins, S. Adding depth to cartoons using sparse depth (in)equalities. Comput. Graph. Forum 29, 2 (2010), 615--623.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Talton, J. O., Gibson, D., Yang, L., Hanrahan, P., and Koltun, V. Exploratory modeling with collaborative design spaces. ACM Trans. Graph. 28, 5 (2009), 167:1--167:10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Talton, J. O., Lou, Y., Lesser, S., Duke, J., Mech, R., and Koltun, V. Metropolis procedural modeling. ACM Trans. Graph. 30, 2 (Apr. 2011), 11:1--11:14. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Tamuz, O., Liu, C., Belongie, S., Shamir, O., and Kalai, A. Adaptively learning the crowd kernel. In Proc. ICML '11, ACM (2011), 673--680.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Terry, M., and Mynatt, E. D. Side views: Persistent, on-demand previews for open-ended tasks. In Proc. UIST '02, ACM (2002), 71--80. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Terry, M., Mynatt, E. D., Nakakoji, K., and Yamamoto, Y. Variation in element and action: Supporting simultaneous development of alternative solutions. In Proc. CHI '04, ACM (2004), 711--718. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Willett, W., Heer, J., and Agrawala, M. Scented widgets: Improving navigation cues with embedded visualizations. IEEE Trans. Visual. Comput. Graphics 13, 6 (2007), 1129--1136. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Witkin, A., and Kass, M. Spacetime constraints. SIGGRAPH Comput. Graph. 22, 4 (1988), 159--168. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Xu, A., Huang, S.-W., and Bailey, B. Voyant: Generating structured feedback on visual designs using a crowd of non-experts. In Proc. CSCW '14, ACM (2014), 1433--1444. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Crowd-powered parameter analysis for visual design exploration

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        UIST '14: Proceedings of the 27th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology
        October 2014
        722 pages
        ISBN:9781450330695
        DOI:10.1145/2642918

        Copyright © 2014 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 5 October 2014

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        UIST '14 Paper Acceptance Rate74of333submissions,22%Overall Acceptance Rate842of3,967submissions,21%

        Upcoming Conference

        UIST '24

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader