skip to main content
10.1145/2645672.2645679acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescommConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Opportunistic interaction in the challenged internet of things

Published:07 September 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Under intermittent Internet connectivity, enabling interaction between smart objects and mobile users in the Internet of Things (IoT) becomes a challenge. We thus discuss the notion of a 'Challenged IoT' and propose Direct Interaction with Smart Challenged Objects (DISCO), enabling objects to define their interaction patterns and interface. Building on the distinct features of Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE), objects then convey their interface directly to mobile users. DISCO mitigates the need for Internet connectivity and pre-installed interfaces, i.e., smartphone apps, of existing approaches and proposes autonomous and local interaction with smart objects as a challenged network scenario. We implement DISCO for Android and iOS smartphones as well as Linux and Arduino objects and illustrate the design space of interaction patterns with Augmented Reality (AR) interaction based on visual object recognition within the tangible interaction sphere of the user. Our system evaluation shows the immediate real-life feasibility and applicability of DISCO on current hardware.

References

  1. Apple. iOS: Understanding iBeacon. http://support.apple.com/kb/HT6048.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bluetooth Special Interest Group (SIG). Bluetooth Core Specification Version 4.1. https://www.bluetooth.org/DocMan/handlers/DownloadDoc.ashx?doc_id=282159.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. N. Davies, A. Friday, P. Newman, S. Rutlidge, and O. Storz. Using bluetooth device names to support interaction in smart environments. In MobiSys, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. C. Gomez, J. Oller, and J. Paradells. Overview and evaluation of bluetooth low energy: An emerging low-power wireless technology. Sensors, 12, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. D. Guinard, V. Trifa, and E. Wilde. A resource oriented architecture for the web of things. In IoT, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. O. R. Helgason, E. A. Yavuz, S. T. Kouyoumdjieva, L. Pajevic, and G. Karlsson. A mobile peer-to-peer system for opportunistic content-centric networking. In MobiHeld, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. V. Heun, S. Kasahara, and P. Maes. Smarter objects: Using ar technology to program physical objects and their interactions. In CHI EA, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Joe Decuir. Bluetooth 4.0: Low Energy. http://chapters.comsoc.org/vancouver/BTLER3.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. L. Labs. LIFX - The Smart WiFi Light Bulb. http://lifx.co/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Lee Badman. Bluetooth 4.1 Aims For Internet of Things. http://www.networkcomputing.com/a/d-id/1234594.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. S. Mayer and D. Guinard. An extensible discovery service for smart things. In WoT Workshop, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. D. Molyneaux and H. Gellersen. Projected interfaces: Enabling serendipitous interaction with smart tangible objects. In TEI, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Philips. Hue - Wireless Lighting. http://meethue.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Qualcomm. Vuforia Framework. http://www.vuforia.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. J. Rüth, H. Wirtz, and K. Wehrle. Demo: Ubiquitous interaction with smart objects. In MobiSys, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. A. Sampson. Measuring Smartphone Energy on a Budget. https://homes.cs.washington.edu/ asampson/blog/powermeasurement.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. D. Schmidt, D. Molyneaux, and X. Cao. Picontrol: Using a handheld projector for direct control of physical devices through visible light. In UIST, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. S. Trifunovic, A. Picu, T. Hossmann, and K. A. Hummel. Slicing the battery pie: Fair and efficient energy usage in device-to-device communication via role switching. In CHANTS, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Opportunistic interaction in the challenged internet of things

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHANTS '14: Proceedings of the 9th ACM MobiCom workshop on Challenged networks
        September 2014
        104 pages
        ISBN:9781450330718
        DOI:10.1145/2645672

        Copyright © 2014 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 7 September 2014

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        CHANTS '14 Paper Acceptance Rate15of37submissions,41%Overall Acceptance Rate61of159submissions,38%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader