skip to main content
10.1145/2645672.2645687acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescommConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Hot spot selection in rural access nanosatellite networks

Published:07 September 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Nanosatellites architectures have been proposed as a cost-effective solution to extend the network access in rural and remote areas. To guarantee a reliable service and a large coverage, a good number of nanosatellites and ground stations (or hot spot) must be deployed. During a data connection, a server on the Internet that wants to reply to the user on rural area, has many hot spot alternatives to whom it can deliver data. The problem of choosing the "optimal" hot spot becomes important because a wrong choice could lead a high delivery delay. In this paper, we propose "HotSel": an hot spot selection mechanism able to minimize the delivery time. HotSel is simple and practical, and outperforms two other selection mechanisms used as comparison.

References

  1. S. Burleigh. Nanosatellites for universal network access. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM MobiCom workshop on Lowest cost denominator networking for universal access, pages 33--34. ACM, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. C. Caini, H. Cruickshank, S. Farrell, and M. Marchese. Delay-and disruption-tolerant networking (dtn): an alternative solution for future satellite networking applications. Proceedings of the IEEE, 99(11):1980--1997, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. V. Cerf, S. Burleigh, A. Hooke, L. Torgerson, R. Durst, K. Scott, K. Fall, and H. Weiss. Delay-tolerant networking architecture. RFC4838, April, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Facebook and partners. Facebook and partner's project internet.org. http://www.internet.org/, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Google. Google project loon. http://www.google.com/loon/, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. H. Heidt, J. Puig-Suari, A. Moore, S. Nakasuka, and R. J. Twiggs. Cubesat: A new generation of picosatellite for education and industry low-cost space experimentation. In Proceedings of 14th Annual/USU Conference on Small Satellites, Aug 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Inmarsat. Inmarsat satellites. http://www.inmarsat.com/about-us/our-satellites, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Iridium. Iridium global network. http://www.iridium.com/About/IridiumGlobalNetwork.aspx, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. A. S. Pentland, R. Fletcher, and A. Hasson. Daknet: Rethinking connectivity in developing nations. Computer, 37(1):78--83, Jan. 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. A. Seth, D. Kroeker, M. Zaharia, S. Guo, and S. Keshav. Low-cost communication for rural internet kiosks using mechanical backhaul. In Proc. of MobiCom '06, pages 334--345. ACM, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Hot spot selection in rural access nanosatellite networks

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHANTS '14: Proceedings of the 9th ACM MobiCom workshop on Challenged networks
        September 2014
        104 pages
        ISBN:9781450330718
        DOI:10.1145/2645672

        Copyright © 2014 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 7 September 2014

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • short-paper

        Acceptance Rates

        CHANTS '14 Paper Acceptance Rate15of37submissions,41%Overall Acceptance Rate61of159submissions,38%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader