skip to main content
10.1145/2645710.2645721acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesrecsysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Automating readers' advisory to make book recommendations for K-12 readers

Published:06 October 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

The academic performance of students is affected by their reading ability, which explains why reading is one of the most important aspects of school curriculums. Promoting good reading habits among K-12 students is essential, given the enormous influence of reading on students' development as learners and members of society. In doing so, it is indispensable to provide readers with engaging and motivating reading selections. Unfortunately, existing book recommenders have failed to offer adequate choices for K-12 readers, since they either ignore the reading abilities of their users or cannot acquire the much-needed information to make recommendations due to privacy issues. To address these problems, we have developed Rabbit, a book recommender that emulates the readers' advisory service offered at school/public libraries. Rabbit considers the readability levels of its readers and determines the facets, i.e.,appeal factors, of books that evoke subconscious, emotional reactions on a reader. The design of Rabbit is unique, since it adopts a multi-dimensional approach to capture the reading abilities, preferences, and interests of its readers, which goes beyond the traditional book content/topical analysis. Conducted empirical studies have shown that Rabbit outperforms a number of (readability-based) book recommenders.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

p9-sidebyside.mp4

mp4

51.8 MB

References

  1. R. Benjamin. Reconstructing Readability: Recent Developments and Recommendations in the Analysis of Text Difficulty. Ed. Psych. Review, 24:63--88, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. C. Coulter and M. Smith. The Construction Zone: Literary Elements in Narrative Research. Educational Researcher, 38(8):577--590, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. A. Cox and K. Horne. Fast-Paced, Romantic, Set in Savannah: A Comparison of Results from Readers' Advisory Databases in the Public Library. Public Library Quarterly, 31(4):285--302, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. S. Givon and V. Lavrenko. Predicting Social-Tags for Cold Start Book Recommendations. In ACM RecSys, pages 333--336, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. N. Hollands. Improving the Model for Interactive Readers' Advisory Service. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 45(3):205--212, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. J. Koberstein and Y.-K. Ng. Using Word Clusters to Detect Similar Web Documents. In KSEM, pages 215--228, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. M. Koolen, J. Kamps, and G. Kazai. Social Book Search: Comparing Topical Relevance Judgments and Book Suggestions for Evaluation. In ACM CIKM, pages 185--194, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. G. Linden, B. Smith, and J. York. Amazon.com Recommendations: Item-to-Item Collaborative Filtering. IEEE Internet Computing, 7(1):76--80, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. N. Manouselis, H. Drachsler, K. Verbert, and E. Duval. Recommender Systems for Learning. Springer Briefs in Electr. and Comp. Eng., 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. J. Oakhill and K. Cain. The Precursors of Reading Ability in Young Readers: Evidence From a Four-Year Longitudinal Study. SSR, 16(2):91--121, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. B. Pang and L. Lee. Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis. FTIR, 2(1--2):1--135, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. M. Pera. Using Online Data Sources to Make Recommendations on Reading Materials for K-12 and Advanced Readers. PhD thesis, BYU, April 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. G. Pirro and J. Euzenat. A Feature and Information Theoretic Framework for Semantic Similarity and Relatedness. In ISWC, pages 615--630, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. J. Saricks. Readers' Advisory Service in the Public Library, 3rd Ed. ALA Store, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. R. Shaban. A Guide to Writing Book Reviews. JEPHC, 4(3):Article 11, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. A. Sieg, B. Mobasher, and R. Burke. Improving the Effectiveness of Collaborative Recommendation with Ontology-based User Profiles. In ACM HetRec, pages 39--46, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. C. Yang, B. Wei, J. Wu, Y. Zhang, and L. Zhang. CARES: a Ranking-oriented CADAL Recommender System. In ACM/IEEE JCDL, pages 203--212, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Automating readers' advisory to make book recommendations for K-12 readers

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        RecSys '14: Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Recommender systems
        October 2014
        458 pages
        ISBN:9781450326681
        DOI:10.1145/2645710

        Copyright © 2014 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 6 October 2014

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        RecSys '14 Paper Acceptance Rate35of234submissions,15%Overall Acceptance Rate254of1,295submissions,20%

        Upcoming Conference

        RecSys '24
        18th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems
        October 14 - 18, 2024
        Bari , Italy

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader