skip to main content
10.1145/2645791.2645821acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Higher Order Finite Difference Scheme for solving 3D Black-Scholes equation based on Generic Factored Approximate Sparse Inverse Preconditioning using Reordering Schemes

Authors Info & Claims
Published:02 October 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

In the area of derivatives pricing, the key model for the theoretical evaluation of options is the Black-Scholes partial differential equation. In this paper we present a fourth order accurate discretization scheme in conjunction with Richardson extrapolation method, while for the time integration we consider high order implicit Backward Differences along with an implicit Runge-Kutta method for the numerical solution of the Black-Scholes equation in three space variables. The resulting sparse linear system is solved by the Preconditioned Biconjugate Gradient Stabilized (PBiCG-STAB) method, in conjunction with the Modified Generic Factored Approximate Sparse Inverse (MGenFAspI) scheme, based on approximate inverse sparsity patterns, using reordering schemes. Numerical results indicating the applicability along with discussions concerning the implementation issues of the proposed schemes are presented.

References

  1. Achdou, Y., and Pironneau, O. 2005. Computational methods for option pricing. SIAM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Amestoy, P., Davis, T.A., and Duff, I.S. 1996. An approximate minimum degree ordering algorithm. SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications 17(4), 886--905. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Chow, E. 2000. A priori sparsity patterns for parallel sparse approximate inverse preconditioners. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 21, 1804--1822. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Duffy, D.J. 2006. Finite difference methods in financial engineering: A partial differential equation approach. John Wiley and Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Filelis-Papadopoulos, C.K., and Gravvanis, G.A. A class of generic factored and multilevel recursive approximate inverse techniques for solving general sparse systems (submitted).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Grylonakis E-N.G. 2014. On the study and numerical solution of the Black-Scholes equation. Dissertation Thesis, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Democritus University of Thrace.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Gustafsson, B. 2008. High order difference methods for time dependent PDE. Springer Series in Computational Mathematics, Vol.38Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Haug, E.G. 2007. The complete guide to option pricing formulas. McGraw-Hill.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Hull, J. 2009. Options, futures and other derivatives. Prentice-Hall.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Jeong, D., Kim, J., and Wee, I-S. 2009. An accurate and efficient numerical method for Black-Scholes equations. Commun. Korean Math. Soc. 24(4), 617--628Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Leentvaar, C.C.W, and Oosterlee, C.W. 2008. On coordinate transformation and grid stretching for sparse grid pricing of basket options. J. Comp. Appl. Math. 222, 193--209. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Persson, J., and von Sydow, L. 2007. Pricing European multi-asset options using a space-time adaptive FD-method. Comput. Vis. Sci. 10, 173--183. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Saad, Y., Schultz, M.H. 1986. GMRES: A generalized minimal residual algorithm for solving nonsymmetric linear systems. SIAM J. Sci. Comp. 7, 856--869. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Süli, E., and Mayers, D.F. 2003. An introduction to numerical analysis. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Trottenberg, U., Osterlee, C.W., and Schuller, A. 2000. Multigrid. Academic Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Van der Vorst, H.A. 1992. Bi-CGSTAB: A fast and smoothly converging variant of Bi-CG for the solution of nonsymmetric linear systems. SIAM J. Sci. and Stat. Comput. 13(2), 631--644. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Wilmott, P., Dewynne, J., and Howison, S. 1994. Option pricing: Mathematical models and computation. Oxford Financial Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Zhang, P.G. 1998. Exotic Options: A guide to second-generation options. World Scientific, 2nd edition.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Higher Order Finite Difference Scheme for solving 3D Black-Scholes equation based on Generic Factored Approximate Sparse Inverse Preconditioning using Reordering Schemes

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Other conferences
              PCI '14: Proceedings of the 18th Panhellenic Conference on Informatics
              October 2014
              355 pages
              ISBN:9781450328975
              DOI:10.1145/2645791
              • General Chairs:
              • Katsikas Sokratis,
              • Hatzopoulos Michael,
              • Apostolopoulos Theodoros,
              • Anagnostopoulos Dimosthenis,
              • Program Chairs:
              • Carayiannis Elias,
              • Varvarigou Theodora,
              • Nikolaidou Mara

              Copyright © 2014 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 2 October 2014

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • research-article
              • Research
              • Refereed limited

              Acceptance Rates

              PCI '14 Paper Acceptance Rate51of102submissions,50%Overall Acceptance Rate190of390submissions,49%
            • Article Metrics

              • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
              • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

              Other Metrics

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader