skip to main content
10.1145/2660114.2660127acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Making use of Semantic Concept Detection for Modelling Human Preferences in Visual Summarization

Published:07 November 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper we investigate whether and how the human choice of images for summarizing a visual collection is influenced by the semantic concepts depicted in them. More specifically, by analysing a large collection of human-created visual summaries obtained through crowdsourcing, we aim at automatically identifying the objects, settings, actions and events that make an image a good candidate for inclusion in a visual summary. Informed by the outcomes of this analysis, we show that the distribution of semantic concepts can be successfully utilized for learning to rank the images based on their likelihood of inclusion in the summary by a human, and that it can be easily combined with other features related to image content, context, aesthetic appeal and sentiment. Our experiments demonstrate the promise of using semantic concept detectors for automatically analysing crowdsourced user preferences at a large scale.

References

  1. D. Borth, R. Ji, T. Chen, T. Breuel, and S.-F. Chang. Large-scale visual sentiment ontology and detectors using adjective noun pairs. In ACM MM '13, pages 223--232, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Y.-L. Boureau, J. Ponce, and Y. LeCun. A theoretical analysis of feature pooling in visual recognition. In ICML '10, pages 111--118, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. L. Cao, J. Luo, A. Gallagher, X. Jin, J. Han, and T. Huang. A worldwide tourism recommendation system based on geotagged web photos. IEEE ICASSP'10, pages 2274--2277, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. J. Carbonell and J. Goldstein. The use of mmr, diversity-based reranking for reordering documents and producing summaries. In ACM SIGIR '98, pages 335--336, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. O. Chapelle and S. Keerthi. Effcient algorithms for ranking with svms. Inform. Retrieval, 13(3):201--215, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. B. J. Frey and D. Dueck. Clustering by passing messages between data points. Science, 315:972--976, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. B. Ionescu, A.-L. Radu, M. Mendendez, H. Muller, A. Popescu, and B. Loni. Div400: A social image retrieval result diversification dataset. In ACM MMSys '14, pages 29--34, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. L. S. Kennedy and M. Naaman. Generating diverse and representative image search results for landmarks. In WWW '08, pages 297--306, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. A. Khosla, A. Das Sarma, and R. Hamid. What makes an image popular? In WWW '14, pages 867--876, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. M. Lestari Paramita, M. Sanderson, and P. Clough. Diversity in photo retrieval: Overview of the imageclefphoto task 2009. In LNCS, volume 6242, pages 45--59. 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. A. Nenkova, R. Passonneau, and K. McKeown. The pyramid method: Incorporating human content selection variation in summarization evaluation. ACM Trans. Speech Lang. Process., 4(2), 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. K. Owczarzak and H. T. Dang. Overview of the TAC 2011 summarization track: Guided task and AESOP task. In TAC '11, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Y. Pang, Q. Hao, Y. Yuan, T. Hu, R. Cai, and L. Zhang. Summarizing tourist destinations by mining user-generated travelogues and photos. Comput. Vis. Image Und., 115:352--363, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. S. Rudinac, M. Larson, and A. Hanjalic. Learning crowdsourced user preferences for visual summarization of image collections. IEEE Trans. Multimedia, 15(6):1231--1243, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. C. G. M. Snoek, K. E. A. van de Sande, A. Habibian, S. Kordumova, Z. Li, M. Mazloom, S. L. Pintea, R. Tao, D. C. Koelma, and A. W. M. Smeulders. The mediamill trecvid 2012 semantic video search engine. In TRECVID Workshop, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Making use of Semantic Concept Detection for Modelling Human Preferences in Visual Summarization

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CrowdMM '14: Proceedings of the 2014 International ACM Workshop on Crowdsourcing for Multimedia
        November 2014
        84 pages
        ISBN:9781450331289
        DOI:10.1145/2660114
        • General Chairs:
        • Judith Redi,
        • Mathias Lux

        Copyright © 2014 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 7 November 2014

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • poster

        Acceptance Rates

        CrowdMM '14 Paper Acceptance Rate8of26submissions,31%Overall Acceptance Rate16of42submissions,38%

        Upcoming Conference

        MM '24
        MM '24: The 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia
        October 28 - November 1, 2024
        Melbourne , VIC , Australia
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader