skip to main content
10.1145/2660267.2660352acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesccsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

AUTOPROBE: Towards Automatic Active Malicious Server Probing Using Dynamic Binary Analysis

Authors Info & Claims
Published:03 November 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Malware continues to be one of the major threats to Internet security. In the battle against cybercriminals, accurately identifying the underlying malicious server infrastructure (e.g., C&C servers for botnet command and control) is of vital importance. Most existing passive monitoring approaches cannot keep up with the highly dynamic, ever-evolving malware server infrastructure. As an effective complementary technique, active probing has recently attracted attention due to its high accuracy, efficiency, and scalability (even to the Internet level). In this paper, we propose Autoprobe, a novel system to automatically generate effective and efficient fingerprints of remote malicious servers. Autoprobe addresses two fundamental limitations of existing active probing approaches: it supports pull-based C&C protocols, used by the majority of malware, and it generates fingerprints even in the common case when C&C servers are not alive during fingerprint generation. Using real-world malware samples we show that Autoprobe can successfully generate accurate C&C server fingerprints through novel applications of dynamic binary analysis techniques. By conducting Internet-scale active probing, we show that Autoprobe can successfully uncover hundreds of malicious servers on the Internet, many of them unknown to existing blacklists. We believe Autoprobe is a great complement to existing defenses, and can play a unique role in the battle against cybercriminals.

References

  1. Dirtjumper. http://www.infonomics-society.org/IJICR/DirtJumper.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexa Top Domains. http://www.alexa.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Ofir Arkin. A remote active os fingerprinting tool using icmp. ;login: The USENIX Magazine, 27(2), November 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Bamital Malware. https://now-static.norton.com/now/en/pu/images/Promotions/2013/Bamital/bamital.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Juan Caballero, Noah M. Johnson, Stephen McCamant, and Dawn Song. Binary code extraction and interface identification for security applications. In Network and Distributed System Security Symposium, San Diego, CA, February 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Juan Caballero, Pongsin Poosankam, Christian Kreibich, and Dawn Song. Dispatcher: Enabling active botnet infiltration using automatic protocol reverse-engineering. In ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, Chicago, IL, November 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Juan Caballero, Shobha Venkataraman, Pongsin Poosankam, Min G. Kang, Dawn Song, and Avrim Blum. fig: Automatic fingerprint generation. In Network and Distributed System Security Symposium, San Diego, CA, February 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Juan Caballero, Heng Yin, Zhenkai Liang, and Dawn Song. Polyglot: Automatic extraction of protocol message format using dynamic binary analysis. In ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, Alexandria, VA, October 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Paolo Milani Comparetti, Gilbert Wondracek, Christopher Kruegel, and Engin Kirda. Prospex: Protocol specification extraction. In IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, Oakland, CA, May 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Weidong Cui, Jayanthkumar Kannan, and Helen J. Wang. Discoverer: Automatic protocol description generation from network traces. In USENIX Security Symposium, Boston, MA, August 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. David Dagon, Chris Lee, Wenke Lee, and Niels Provos. Corrupted dns resolution paths: The rise of a malicious resolution authority. In Network and Distributed System Security Symposium, San Diego, CA, February 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Zakir Durumeric, Eric Wustrow, and J. Alex Halderman. Zmap: Fast internet-wide scanning and its security applications. In Usenix Security Symposium, August 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Nicolas Falliere. Sality: Story of a peer-to-peer viral network. Technical report, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Guofei Gu, Vinod Yegneswaran, Phillip Porras, Jennifer Stoll, and Wenke Lee. Active botnet probing to identify obscure command and control channels. In Proceedings of 2009 Annual Computer Security Applications Conference (ACSAC'09), December 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Guofei Gu, Junjie Zhang, and Wenke Lee. BotHunter: Detecting Malware Infection Through IDS-Driven Dialog Correlation. InProceedings of USENIX Security'07, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Nadia Heninger, Zagir Durumeric, Eric Wustrow, and J.Alex Halderman. Mining your ps and qs: Detection of widespread weak keys in network devices. In USENIX Security Symposium, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Noah M. Johnson, Juan Caballero, Kevin Zhijie Chen, Stephen McCamant, Pongsin Poosankam, Daniel Reynaud, and Dawn Song. Differential slicing: Identifying causal execution differences for security applications. In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Min Gyung Kang, Stephen McCamant, Pongsin Poosankam, and Dawn Song. DTA++: Dynamic taint analysis with targeted control-flow propagation. In Proceedings of the 18th Annual Network and Distributed System Security Symposium, San Diego, CA, February 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Clemens Kolbitsch, Paolo Milani Comparetti, Christopher Kruegel, Engin Kirda, Xiaoyong Zhou, and Xiaofeng Wang. Effective and efficient malware detection at the end host. In USENIX SecuritySymposium, Montréal, Canada, August 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Clemens Kolbitsch, Thorsten Holz, Christopher Kruegel, and Engin Kirda. Inspector gadget: Automated extraction of proprietary gadgets from malware binaries. In IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, Oakland, CA, May 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Zhiqiang Lin, Xuxian Jiang, Dongyan Xu, and Xiangyu Zhang. Automatic protocol format reverse engineering through context-aware monitored execution. In Network and Distributed System Security Symposium, San Diego, CA, February 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Malicia. http://malicia-project.com/. http://malicia-project.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Malware domain list. http://malwaredomainlist.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Andreas Moser, Christopher Kruegel, and Engin Kirda. Exploring Multiple Execution Paths for Malware Analysis. In Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Antonio Nappa, Zhaoyan Xu, M. Zubair Rafique, Juan Caballero, and Guofei Gu. Cyberprobe: Towards internet-scale active detection of malicious servers. In Network and Distributed System Security Symposium, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. James Newsome and Dawn Song. Dynamic taint analysis for automatic detection, analysis, and signature generation of exploits on commodity software. In Network and Distributed System Security Symposium, San Diego, CA, February 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Offensive Computing. http://www.offensivecomputing.net/. http://www.offensivecomputing.net/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Jitendra Padhye and Sally Floyd. Identifying the tcp behavior of web servers. In SIGCOMM Conference, San Diego, CA, August 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Niels Provos and Peter Honeyman. Scanssh - scanning the internet for ssh servers. In Technical Report CITI TR 01--13, University of Michigan, October 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Ramnit Malware. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ramnit.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Konrad Rieck, Guido Schwenk, Tobias Limmer, Thorsten Holz, andPavel Laskov. Botzilla: Detecting the phoning home of malicious software. In ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Prateek Saxena, Pongsin Poosankam, Stephen McCamant, and DawnSong. Loop-extended symbolic execution on binary programs. InProceedings of the ACM/SIGSOFT International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis (ISSTA), 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Edward J. Schwartz, Thanassis Avgerinos, and David Brumley. All you ever wanted to know about dynamic taint analysis and forward symbolic execution (but might have been afraid to ask). In Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Taidoor Malware. Xpaj.b malware. http://www.trendmicro.com/cloud-content/us/pdfs/security-intelligence/white-papers/wp_the_taidoor_campaign.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Urlquery. http://urlquery.net/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Virustotal. http://www.virustotal.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Tielei Wang, Tao Wei, Guofei Gu, and Wei Zou. Taintscope: A checksum-aware directed fuzzing tool for automatic software vulnerability detection. In Proc. of IEEE S&P'10, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Jeffrey Wilhelm and Tzi cker Chiueh. A forced sampled execution approach to kernel rootkit identification. In Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Recent advances in intrusion detection, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Gilbert Wondracek, Paolo Milani Comparetti, Christopher Kruegel, and Engin Kirda. Automatic network protocol analysis. InProceedings of the 15th Annual Network and Distributed System Security Symposium (NDSS), 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. James Wyke. The zeroaccess botnet: Mining and fraud for massive financial gain, September 2012. http://www.sophos.com/en-us/why-sophos/our-people/technical-papers/zeroaccess-botnet.asp:x.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhaoyan Xu, Lingfeng Chen, Guofei Gu, and Christopher Kruegel. Peerpress: Utilizing enemies' p2p strength against them. In ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, Raleigh, NC, October 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. AUTOPROBE: Towards Automatic Active Malicious Server Probing Using Dynamic Binary Analysis

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CCS '14: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security
        November 2014
        1592 pages
        ISBN:9781450329576
        DOI:10.1145/2660267

        Copyright © 2014 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 3 November 2014

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        CCS '14 Paper Acceptance Rate114of585submissions,19%Overall Acceptance Rate1,261of6,999submissions,18%

        Upcoming Conference

        CCS '24
        ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security
        October 14 - 18, 2024
        Salt Lake City , UT , USA

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader