skip to main content
10.1145/2661829.2661988acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Predictability of Distrust with Interaction Data

Published: 03 November 2014 Publication History

Abstract

Trust plays a crucial role in helping users collect reliable information in an online world, and has attracted more and more attention in research communities lately. As a conceptual counterpart of trust, distrust can be as important as trust. However, distrust is rarely studied in social media because distrust information is usually unavailable. The value of distrust has been widely recognized in social sciences and recent work shows that distrust can benefit various online applications in social media. In this work, we investigate whether we can obtain distrust information via learning when it is not directly available, and propose to study a novel problem - predicting distrust using pervasively available interaction data in an online world. In particular, we analyze interaction data, provide a principled way to mathematically incorporate interaction data in a novel framework dTrust to predict distrust information. Experimental results using real-world data show that distrust information is predictable with interaction data by the proposed framework dTrust. Further experiments are conducted to gain a deep understand on which factors contribute to the effectiveness of the proposed framework.

References

[1]
B. Barber. The logic and limits of trust. Rutgers University Press New Brunswick, NJ, 1983.
[2]
D. Cartwright and F. Harary. Structural balance: a generalization of heider's theory. Psychological Review, 1956.
[3]
K.-Y. Chiang, N. Natarajan, A. Tewari, and I. S. Dhillon. Exploiting longer cycles for link prediction in signed networks. In CIKM, 2011.
[4]
J. Cho. The mechanism of trust and distrust formation and their relational outcomes. Journal of Retailing, 2006.
[5]
J. Audun. Artificial reasoning with subjective logic. Proceedings of the Second Australian Workshop on Commonsense Reasoning, 2006.
[6]
P. Cofta. Distrust. In ICEC, 2006.
[7]
T. DuBois, J. Golbeck, and A. Srinivasan. Predicting trust and distrust in social networks. In socialcom, 2011.
[8]
J. Golbeck. Generating predictive movie recommendations from trust in social networks. Trust Management, 2006.
[9]
J. Golbeck. Trust and nuanced profile similarity in online social networks. TWEB, 2009.
[10]
R. Guha, R. Kumar, P. Raghavan, and A. Tomkins. Propagation of trust and distrust. In WWW, 2004.
[11]
R. Hardin. Distrust: Manifestations and management. Russell Sage Foundation, 2004.
[12]
F. Heider. Attitudes and cognitive organization. The Journal of psychology, 1946.
[13]
C.-J. Hsieh, K.-Y. Chiang, and I. S. Dhillon. Low rank modeling of signed networks. In KDD, 2012.
[14]
A. Josang, E. Gray, and M. Kinateder. Analysing topologies of transitive trust. In FAST2003, 2003.
[15]
R. M. Kramer. Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annual review of psychology, 1999.
[16]
D. W. Larson and R. Hardin. Distrust: Prudent, if not always wise. Distrust, 2004.
[17]
J. Leskovec, D. Huttenlocher, and J. Kleinberg. Predicting positive and negative links in online social networks. In WWW, 2010.
[18]
R. J. Lewicki, D. J. McAllister, and R. J. Bies. Trust and distrust: New relationships and realities. Academy of management Review, 1998.
[19]
D. Liben-Nowell and J. Kleinberg. The link-prediction problem for social networks. Journal of the American society for information science and technology, 2007.
[20]
H. Liu, E. Lim, H. Lauw, M. Le, A. Sun, J. Srivastava, and Y. Kim. Predicting trusts among users of online communities: an epinions case study. In EC, 2008.
[21]
Y. Lu, P. Tsaparas, A. Ntoulas, and L. Polanyi. Exploiting social context for review quality prediction. In WWW, 2010.
[22]
H. Ma, D. Zhou, C. Liu, M. Lyu, and I. King. Recommender systems with social regularization. In WSDM, 2011.
[23]
N. Ma, E. Lim, V. Nguyen, A. Sun, and H. Liu. Trust relationship prediction using online product review data. In Proceeding of the 1st ACM international workshop on Complex networks meet information & knowledge management, 2009.
[24]
P. Massa and P. Avesani. Trust-aware bootstrapping of recommender systems. In ECAI Workshop on Recommender Systems, 2006.
[25]
S. Chang, G. Qi, J. Tang, Q. Tian, Y. Rui and T. Huang. Multimedia LEGO: LEarning structured model by probabilistic loGic Ontology tree. In ICDM, 2013.
[26]
D. H. McKnight and N. L. Chervany. Trust and distrust definitions: One bite at a time. In Trust in Cyber-societies, 2001.
[27]
D. H. McKnight and V. Choudhury. Distrust and trust in b2c e-commerce: Do they differ? In ICEC, 2006.
[28]
V. Nguyen, E. Lim, J. Jiang, and A. Sun. To trust or not to trust? predicting online trusts using trust antecedent framework. In ICDM, 2009.
[29]
J. Nocedal and S. Wright. Numerical optimization. Springer verlag, 1999.
[30]
Y. Qian and S. Adali. Extended structural balance theory for modeling trust in social networks. PST, 2013.
[31]
M. Richardson and P. Domingos. Mining knowledge-sharing sites for viral marketing. In KDD, 2002.
[32]
Z. Li, S. Chang, F. Liang, T. Huang, L. Cao and J. Smith. Learning Locally-Adaptive Decision Functions for Person Verification. In CVPR, 2013.
[33]
J. B. Rotter. Interpersonal trust, trustworthiness, and gullibility. American psychologist, 1980.
[34]
J. Singh and D. Sirdeshmukh. Agency and trust mechanisms in consumer satisfaction and loyalty judgments. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2000.
[35]
J. Tang, H. Gao, X. Hu, and H. Liu. Exploiting homophily effect for trust prediction. In WSDM, 2013.
[36]
J. Tang, H. Gao, H. Liu, and A. Das Sarma. eTrust: Understanding trust evolution in an online world. In KDD, pages 253--261. ACM, 2012.
[37]
J. Tang and H. Liu. Trust in social computing. In WWW, 2014.
[38]
J. Tang, X. Hu, and H. Liu. Is distrust the negation of trust? the value of distrust in social media. In HT, 2014.
[39]
J. Tang, Y. Chang, and H. Liu. Mining social media with social theories: A survey. SIGKDD Explorations, 2014.
[40]
J. Tang, T. Lou, and J. Kleinberg. Inferring social ties across heterogenous networks. In WSDM, 2012.
[41]
P. Victor, N. Verbiest, C. Cornelis, and M. D. Cock. Enhancing the trust-based recommendation process with explicit distrust. TWEB, 2013.
[42]
S.-H. Yang, A. J. Smola, B. Long, H. Zha, and Y. Chang. Friend or frenemy?: predicting signed ties in social networks. In SIGIR, 2012.
[43]
J. Ye, H. Cheng, Z. Zhu, and M. Chen. Predicting positive and negative links in signed social networks by transfer learning. In WWW, 2013.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)E-SERS: An Enhanced Approach to Trust-Based Ranking of AppsSoftware10.3390/software30300133:3(250-270)Online publication date: 13-Jul-2024
  • (2022)POLEProceedings of the Fifteenth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining10.1145/3488560.3498454(390-400)Online publication date: 11-Feb-2022
  • (2022)Trust in Social MediaundefinedOnline publication date: 29-Mar-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Predictability of Distrust with Interaction Data

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CIKM '14: Proceedings of the 23rd ACM International Conference on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management
      November 2014
      2152 pages
      ISBN:9781450325981
      DOI:10.1145/2661829
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 03 November 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. balance theory
      2. distrust in social media
      3. interaction data
      4. predictability of distrust

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Funding Sources

      Conference

      CIKM '14
      Sponsor:

      Acceptance Rates

      CIKM '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 175 of 838 submissions, 21%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 1,861 of 8,427 submissions, 22%

      Upcoming Conference

      CIKM '25

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 28 Feb 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)E-SERS: An Enhanced Approach to Trust-Based Ranking of AppsSoftware10.3390/software30300133:3(250-270)Online publication date: 13-Jul-2024
      • (2022)POLEProceedings of the Fifteenth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining10.1145/3488560.3498454(390-400)Online publication date: 11-Feb-2022
      • (2022)Trust in Social MediaundefinedOnline publication date: 29-Mar-2022
      • (2021)Transaction Prediction in BlockchainWireless Communications & Mobile Computing10.1155/2021/88711502021Online publication date: 1-Jan-2021
      • (2019)Unsupervised Negative Link Prediction in Signed Social NetworksMathematical Problems in Engineering10.1155/2019/73483012019:1Online publication date: 30-Apr-2019
      • (2019)Signed Link Prediction with Sparse Data: The Role of Personality InformationCompanion Proceedings of The 2019 World Wide Web Conference10.1145/3308560.3316469(1270-1278)Online publication date: 13-May-2019
      • (2017)Learning to Rank with Trust and Distrust in Recommender SystemsProceedings of the Eleventh ACM Conference on Recommender Systems10.1145/3109859.3109879(5-13)Online publication date: 27-Aug-2017
      • (2017)Measurement Theory-Based Trust Management Framework for Online Social CommunitiesACM Transactions on Internet Technology10.1145/301577117:2(1-24)Online publication date: 24-Mar-2017
      • (2017)An explicit trust and distrust clustering based collaborative filtering recommendation approachElectronic Commerce Research and Applications10.1016/j.elerap.2017.06.00525:C(29-39)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2017
      • (2017)Trust and Distrust in Web: Two Sides of a Same Coin or Poles Apart?ICT Based Innovations10.1007/978-981-10-6602-3_24(245-250)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2017
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media