ABSTRACT
Usability inspections are a set of methods for evaluating one interactive system by experts. They try to find possible usability problems and determining the level of usability of the system without involving real users. One of these methods is heuristic evaluation, where several experts inspect one system or its interface for searching usability issues. Some authors maintain that evaluation by experts in usability discovers more usability issues than evaluation conducted by non-experts. But the question is how to determine the degree of expertise of an evaluator.
In this paper we will propose a classification of evaluators based on the university degree obtained or the number of hours of practice gathered in this field. One user could be classified as expert depending on his/her professional career and not only by university degrees. This is why it is important to collect other attributes of each user like domains, skills or projects to determine their expertise. We finally present how to validate these attributes by other users of the proposed repository.
- Beyer, H., Holtzblatt, K., 1998. Contextual Design-Defining Customer-Centered Systems. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Constantine, L. L., Lockwood, L. A. 1999. Software for Use- A Practical Guide to the models and methods of Usage-Centered Design. Addison-Wesley Professional. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Computer Science Curricula 2013 http://www.acm.org/education/CS2013-final-report.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Dreyfus, H. & Dreyfus, S. 2005. Peripheral vision expertise in real world contexts. Organization studies, 26, 5, 779--792.Google Scholar
- Ericsson, K. A. 2008. Deliberate practice and acquisition of expert performance: a general overview. Academic Emergency Medicine : Official Journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, 15, 11, 988--94.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Farrel, S., Nielsen, J. 2013. Users experience Careers, How to Become a UX Pro, and How to hire one, Nielsen Norman Group http://www nngroup.com/reports/user-experience-careers/.Google Scholar
- Gladwell, M. 2008. Outliers: The Story of Success. Little, Brown and Company. New York.Google Scholar
- Graduate Degrees in Software Ergonomics at Human Factors International https://www.humanfactors.com/downloads/degrees.aspGoogle Scholar
- Gulliksen, J., Boivie, I. and Göransson, B. 2006. Usability professionals-current practices and future development. Interacting with Computers. 18, 4 (July 2006), 568--600. DOI=10.1016/j.intcom.2005.10.005 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Human Computer Interaction Beta. http://hcicourse.comGoogle Scholar
- Human-Computer Interaction Standford Online. http://online.stanford.edu/course/hciGoogle Scholar
- ISO 9241-11. 1998. Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs) Part 11: Guidance on Usability. ISOGoogle Scholar
- ISO/IEC 25010:2011. 2011. System and Software Engineering - Systems and Software Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE) - System and Software Quality ModelsGoogle Scholar
- Nielsen, J. 1993. What is usability? In: What is Usability Engineering. Cambridge MA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Online User eXperience Institute. http://www.ouxinstitute.com/Curriculum/CourseList/index.phpGoogle Scholar
- Schaffer, E. 2004. Institutionalization of usability: a step-by-step guide. Addison-Wesley Professional. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Shackel, B., 1981. The concept of usability. Proceedings of IBM software and information usability symposium, Poughkeepsie, NY, 15-18 September, 1-30Google Scholar
- Shanteau, J., Weiss, D. J., Thomas, R. P., & Pounds, J. C. 2002. Performance-based assessment of expertise: How to decide if someone is an expert or not. European Journal of Operational Research, 136, 2, 253--263.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Simon, H. A., & Gilmartin, K. 1973. A simulation of memory for chess positions. Cognitive psychology, 5, 1, 29--46.Google Scholar
- Spanish Association Interacción-Persona Ordenador. http://www.aipo.esGoogle Scholar
- User Experience Professionals Association. https://uxpa.orgGoogle Scholar
Index Terms
- How to classify to experts in usability evaluation
Recommendations
A comparative study of two usability evaluation methods using a web-based e-learning application
SAICSIT '07: Proceedings of the 2007 annual research conference of the South African institute of computer scientists and information technologists on IT research in developing countriesUsability evaluation of e-learning applications is a maturing area, which addresses interfaces, usability and interaction from human-computer interaction (HCI) and pedagogy and learning from education. The selection of usability evaluation methods (UEMs)...
Is usability evaluation important: the perspective of novice software developers
BCS-HCI '13: Proceedings of the 27th International BCS Human Computer Interaction ConferenceIn this paper we present the results of a study which aims to explore the perspective of novice software developers about usability evaluation. It is important for a software organization to understand how novice developers perceive the role and ...
The usability inspection performance of work-domain experts: An empirical study
It is a challenge for usability experts to perform usability inspections of interactive systems that are tailored to work-domains of which these experts have little knowledge. To counter this, usability inspections with work-domain experts have been ...
Comments