skip to main content
10.1145/2663204.2666282acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesicmi-mlmiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

Facial Expression Analysis for Estimating Pain in Clinical Settings

Published:12 November 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Pain assessment is vital for effective pain management in clinical settings. It is generally obtained via patient's self-report or observer's assessment. Both of these approaches suffer from several drawbacks such as unavailability of self-report, idiosyncratic use and observer bias. This work aims at developing automated machine learning based approaches for estimating pain in clinical settings. We propose to use facial expression information to accomplish current goals since previous studies have demonstrated consistency between facial behavior and experienced pain. Moreover, with recent advances in computer vision it is possible to design algorithms for identifying spontaneous expressions such as pain in more naturalistic conditions.

Our focus is towards designing robust computer vision models for estimating pain in videos containing patient's facial behavior. In this regard we discuss different research problem, technical approaches and challenges that needs to be addressed. In this work we particularly highlight the problem of predicting self-report measures of pain intensity since this problem is not only more challenging but also received less attention. We also discuss our efforts towards collecting an in-situ pediatric pain dataset for validating these approaches. We conclude the paper by presenting some results on both UNBC Mc-Master Pain dataset and pediatric pain dataset.

References

  1. Aggarwal, J., and Ryoo, M. S. Human activity analysis: A review. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 43, 3 (2011), 16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Ashraf, A. B., Lucey, S., Cohn, J. F., Chen, T., Ambadar, Z., Prkachin, K. M., and Solomon, P. E. The painful face-pain expression recognition using active appearance models. Image and vision computing 27, 12 (2009), 1788--1796. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bartlett, M. S., Littlewort, G. C., Frank, M. G., Lainscsek, C., Fasel, I., and Movellan, J. Recognizing facial expression: machine learning and application to spontaneous behavior. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2005. CVPR 2005. IEEE Computer Society Conference on, vol. 2, IEEE (2005), 568--573. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Bartlett, M. S., Littlewort, G. C., Frank, M. G., and Lee, K. Automatic decoding of facial movements reveals deceptive pain expressions. Current Biology 24, 7 (2014), 738--743.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Cohen, I., Sebe, N., Garg, A., Chen, L. S., and Huang, T. S. Facial expression recognition from video sequences: temporal and static modeling. Computer Vision and Image Understanding 91, 1 (2003), 160--187. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Craig, K. D. The facial expression of pain better than a thousand words? APS Journal 1, 3 (1992), 153--162.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Howard, R. F. Current status of pain management in children. Jama 290, 18 (2003), 2464--2469.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Huguet, A., Stinson, J. N., and McGrath, P. J. Measurement of self-reported pain intensity in children and adolescents. Journal of psychosomatic research 68, 4 (2010), 329--336.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Kaltwang, S., Rudovic, O., and Pantic, M. Continuous pain intensity estimation from facial expressions. In Advances in Visual Computing. Springer, 2012, 368--377.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Kaseweter, K. A., Drwecki, B. B., and Prkachin, K. M. Racial differences in pain treatment and empathy in a canadian sample. Pain Research & Management: The Journal of the Canadian Pain Society 17, 6 (2012), 381.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Littlewort, G. C., Bartlett, M. S., Fasel, I., Susskind, J., and Movellan, J. Dynamics of facial expression extracted automatically from video. Image and Vision Computing 24, 6 (2006), 615--625. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Littlewort, G. C., Whitehill, J., Wu, T., Fasel, I., Frank, M., Movellan, J., and Bartlett, M. The computer expression recognition toolbox (cert). In Automatic Face & Gesture Recognition and Workshops (FG 2011), 2011 IEEE International Conference on, IEEE (2011), 298--305.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Littlewort, G. C., Whitehill, J., Wu, T.-F., Butko, N., Ruvolo, P., Movellan, J., and Bartlett, M. The motion in emotiona cert based approach to the fera emotion challenge. In Automatic Face & Gesture Recognition and Workshops (FG 2011), 2011 IEEE International Conference on, IEEE (2011), 897--902.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Lucey, P., Cohn, J. F., Kanade, T., Saragih, J., Ambadar, Z., and Matthews, I. The extended cohn-kanade dataset (ck+): A complete dataset for action unit and emotion-specified expression. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW), 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on, IEEE (2010), 94--101.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Lucey, P., Cohn, J. F., Prkachin, K. M., Solomon, P. E., and Matthews, I. Painful data: The unbc-mcmaster shoulder pain expression archive database. In Automatic Face & Gesture Recognition and Workshops (FG 2011), 2011 IEEE International Conference on, IEEE (2011), 57--64.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Lucey, P., Howlett, J., Cohn, J. F., Lucey, S., Sridharan, S., and Ambadar, Z. Improving pain recognition through better utilisation of temporal information. In AVSP (2008), 167--172.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Prkachin, K. M., Berzins, S., and Mercer, S. R. Encoding and decoding of pain expressions: a judgement study. Pain 58, 2 (1994), 253--259.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Rudovic, O., Pavlovic, V., and Pantic, M. Automatic pain intensity estimation with heteroscedastic conditional ordinal random fields. In Advances in Visual Computing. Springer, 2013, 234--243.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Savran, A., Sankur, B., and Taha Bilge, M. Regression-based intensity estimation of facial action units. Image and Vision Computing 30, 10 (2012), 774--784. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Sikka, K., Dhall, A., and Bartlett, M. Weakly supervised pain localization using multiple instance learning. In Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (FG), 2013 10th IEEE International Conference and Workshops on, IEEE (2013), 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Solomon, P. Congruence between health professionals and patients pain ratings: a review of the literature. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences 15, 2 (2001), 174--180.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Stinson, J. N., Kavanagh, T., Yamada, J., Gill, N., and Stevens, B. Systematic review of the psychometric properties, interpretability and feasibility of self-report pain intensity measures for use in clinical trials in children and adolescents. Pain 125, 1 (2006), 143--157.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Tomlinson, D., von Baeyer, C. L., Stinson, J. N., and Sung, L. A systematic review of faces scales for the self-report of pain intensity in children. Pediatrics (2010), peds'2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Turk, D. C., and Melzack, R. Handbook of pain assessment. Guilford Press, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. von Baeyer, C. L., and Spagrud, L. J. Systematic review of observational (behavioral) measures of pain for children and adolescents aged 3 to 18 years. Pain 127, 1 (2007), 140--150.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Wu, T., Bartlett, M. S., and Movellan, J. R. Facial expression recognition using gabor motion energy filters. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW), 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on, IEEE (2010), 42--47.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Zhao, G., and Pietikainen, M. Dynamic texture recognition using local binary patterns with an application to facial expressions. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, IEEE Transactions on 29, 6 (2007), 915--928. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Zhou, H., Roberts, P., and Horgan, L. Association between self-report pain ratings of child and parent, child and nurse and parent and nurse dyads: meta-analysis. Journal of Ddvanced Nursing 63, 4 (2008), 334--342.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Facial Expression Analysis for Estimating Pain in Clinical Settings

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          ICMI '14: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Multimodal Interaction
          November 2014
          558 pages
          ISBN:9781450328852
          DOI:10.1145/2663204

          Copyright © 2014 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 12 November 2014

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • extended-abstract

          Acceptance Rates

          ICMI '14 Paper Acceptance Rate51of127submissions,40%Overall Acceptance Rate453of1,080submissions,42%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader