skip to main content
10.1145/2666216.2666238acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
tutorial

Social norms influence student journalists' perception of wearable technologies

Authors Info & Claims
Published:27 September 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this poster presentation, the author presents results of a study about student journalist perceptions of the wearable technology Google Glass (Glass). This poster presents the first set of results of an ongoing research project designed to determine what factors play the largest roles in student decision making processes about whether or not to use a new technology. Survey results of students in a semester-long capstone journalism course are presented. Results indicate that students' perceptions of social norms related to the new technology shaped early use of the wearable device. After becoming more familiar with Glass and using the device in training sessions, student social norm apprehensions did not decrease. This printed poster will include video footage related to the project through augmented reality technology accessible via smartphones.

References

  1. Stephen Drudge. 2013. How Vice's Tim Pool uses Google Glass to cover Istanbul protests. (July 2013). Retrieved April 14, 2014 from http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2013/jul/30/google-glass-istanbul-protests-viceGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Angela Garabet, Steve Mann, and James Fung. 2002. Exploring design through wearable computing art(ifacts). In CHI '02 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '02). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 634--635. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1145/506443.506520 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Jennifer George-Palilonis. 2013. The Multimedia Journalist: Storytelling for Today's Media Landscape. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Toby Hopp. 2013. Subjective Norms as a Driver of Mass Communication Students' Intentions to Adopt New Media Production Technologies. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator. 68, 4 (Nov. 2013), 348--364.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Stephen Marsh, Lucy Nowell, John F. Meech, and Kerstin Dautenhahn. 2002. The philosophy and design of socially adept technologies. In CHI '02 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '02). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 918--919. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1145/506443.506658 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Punya Mishra, Matthew Koehler and Kristen Kereluik. 2009. The song remains the same: Looking back to the future of educational technology. TechTrends, 53, 5 (Sept. 2009), 48--53. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/s11528-009-0325-3Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Robert Papper. 2011. Station websites continue to grow..but many stations struggle with working across multiple platforms. Electronic News, 5, 1 (March 2011), 60--69. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1177/1931243110392343Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. John Pavlik and Frank Bridges. 2013. The Emergence of Augmented Reality (AR) as a Storytelling Medium in Journalism. Journalism & Communication Monographs, 15, 1 (March 2013), 4--59. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1177/1522637912470819Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Chris Preist, Elaine Massung, and David Coyle. 2014. Competing or aiming to be average?: normification as a means of engaging digital volunteers. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing (CSCW '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1222--1233. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1145/2531602.2531615 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Andrew Sulzberger. 2014. New York Times Innovation Report. (May 2014). Retrieved May 15, 2014 from http://www.scribd.com/doc/224332847/NYT-Innovation-Report-2014Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Brianna Valleskey, B. 2014. 3 Ways Google Glass Could Change Journalism. (April 2014). Retrieved April 14, 2014 from http://www.benzinga.com/general/education/14/04/4441345/3-ways-google-glass-could-change-journalismGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Andreas Veglis and Andreas Pomportsis. 2014. Journalists in the Age of ICTs: Work Demands and Educational Needs. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator 69, 1 (March 2014), 61--75. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1177/1077695813513766.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Viswanath Venkatesh, Robert Smith, Michael Morris, Gordon Davis and Fred Davis. 2003. User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View, MIS Quarterly 27, 3 (Sept. 2003), 425--478. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Kenny Zhu. 2014. North Korea...Through Google Glass. (May 2014). Retrieved May 10, 2014 from http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-1130606Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Social norms influence student journalists' perception of wearable technologies

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          SIGDOC '14: Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on The Design of Communication CD-ROM
          September 2014
          137 pages
          ISBN:9781450331838
          DOI:10.1145/2666216

          Copyright © 2014 Owner/Author

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 27 September 2014

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • tutorial
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          SIGDOC '14 Paper Acceptance Rate23of38submissions,61%Overall Acceptance Rate355of582submissions,61%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader