skip to main content
10.1145/2666310.2666395acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Adding completeness information to query answers over spatial databases

Published:04 November 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Real-life spatial databases are inherently incomplete. This is in particular the case when data from different sources are combined. An extreme example are volunteered geographical information systems like OpenStreetMap.

When querying such databases the question arises how reliable are the retrieved answers. For instance, for positive queries, which ask for existing patterns of objects, further answers could show up if the data is completed. For queries with negation, it is furthermore possible that after data completion objects cease to satisfy a query.

On the OpenStreetMap wiki, contributors have started to record for some areas which object types have been mapped completely. Given a query, we show how such metainformation can be used to classify objects in the database as certain answers, which are certainly answers in reality, impossible answers, which in reality are definitely not answers, and possible answers, for which it is not known whether they are answers in reality. In addition, we compute the completeness area of a query, that is the maximal area for which it is certain that no further answer objects exist in reality.

All this additional information can be computed with standard operations on spatial data. Experiments suggest that the computation of such completeness information is feasible.

References

  1. S. Abiteboul, R. Hull, and V. Vianu. Foundations of databases. In Addison-Wesley, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. R. H. Güting. An introduction to spatial database systems. VLDB J., 3(4):357--399, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. M. Haklay. How good is volunteered geographical information? A comparative study of OpenStreetMap and Ordnance Survey datasets. Environment and Planning. B, Planning & Design, 37(4):682, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. M. Haklay and C. Ellul. Completeness in volunteered geographical information---the evolution of OpenStreetMap coverage in England (2008--2009). Journal of Spatial Information Science, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. T. Imieliński and W. Lipski, Jr. Incomplete information in relational databases. J. ACM, 31: 761--791, 1984. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. A. Y. Levy. Obtaining complete answers from incomplete databases. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, pages 402--412, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. P. Mooney, P. Corcoran, and A. Winstanley. Towards quality metrics for OpenStreetMap. In Proceedings of the 18th SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems, pages 514--517. ACM, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. A. Motro. Integrity = Validity + Completeness. ACM TODS, 14(4):480--502, 1989. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. S. Razniewski and W. Nutt. Completeness of queries over incomplete databases. In VLDB, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. S. Razniewski and W. Nutt. Assessing the completeness of geographical data (short paper). In BNCOD, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. W. Shi, P. Fisher, and M. Goodchild. Spatial Data Quality. CRC, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. T. Wang and J. Wang. Visualisation of spatial data quality for internet and mobile GIS applications. Journal of Spatial Science, 49(1):97--107, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. D. Zielstra, H. H. Hochmair, and P. Neis. Assessing the effect of data imports on the completeness of openstreetmap--a united states case study. Transactions in GIS, 17(3):315--334, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Adding completeness information to query answers over spatial databases

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SIGSPATIAL '14: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems
        November 2014
        651 pages
        ISBN:9781450331319
        DOI:10.1145/2666310

        Copyright © 2014 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 4 November 2014

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        SIGSPATIAL '14 Paper Acceptance Rate39of184submissions,21%Overall Acceptance Rate220of1,116submissions,20%
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader