skip to main content
10.1145/2666633.2666638acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesicmi-mlmiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Combining empirical and machine learning techniques to predict math expertise using pen signal features

Published: 12 November 2014 Publication History

Abstract

Multimodal learning analytics aims to automatically analyze students' natural communication patterns based on speech, writing, and other modalities during learning activities. This research used the Math Data Corpus, which contains time-synchronized multimodal data from collaborating students as they jointly solved problems varying in difficulty. The aim was to investigate how reliably pen signal features, which were extracted as students wrote with digital pens and paper, could identify which student in a group was the dominant domain expert. An additional aim was to improve prediction of expertise based on joint bootstrapping of empirical science and machine learning techniques. To accomplish this, empirical analyses first identified which data partitioning and pen signal features were most reliably associated with expertise. Then alternative machine learning techniques compared classification accuracies based on all pen features, versus empirically selected ones. The best unguided classification accuracy was 70.8%, which improved to 83.3% with empirical guidance. These results demonstrate that handwriting signal features can predict domain expertise in math with high reliability. Hybrid methods also can outperform black-box machine learning in both accuracy and transparency.

References

[1]
Baddeley, A.D. and Hitch, G.J. 1974. Working memory. The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory. G.A. Bower, ed. Academic. 47--89.
[2]
Cheng, P.C.-H. and Rojas-Anaya, H. 2007. Measuring Mathematical Formula Writing Competence: An Application of Graphical Protocol Analysis. (Jan. 2007).
[3]
Clark, H. and Brennan, S. 1991. Grounding in Communication. Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition. L. Resnick, L. B, M. John, S. Teasley, and D., eds. American Psychological Association. 259--292.
[4]
Glaser, R. and Chi, M.T.H. 1988. Overview. The Nature of Expertise. M.T.H. Chi, Glaser, and M.J. Farr, eds. Psychology Press. Xv--xxviii.
[5]
Lindblom, B. 1990. Explaining Phonetic Variation: A Sketch of the H&H Theory. Speech Production and Speech Modelling. W.J. Hardcastle and A. Marchal, eds. Springer Netherlands. 403--439.
[6]
Miller, G.A. 1956. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review. 63, 2 (1956), 81--97.
[7]
Ochoa, X., Chiluiza, K., Méndez, G., Luzardo, G., Guamán, B. and Castells, J. 2013. Expertise Estimation Based on Simple Multimodal Features. Proceedings of the 15th ACM on International Conference on Multimodal Interaction (2013), 583--590.
[8]
Oviatt, S. 2013. Problem Solving, Domain Expertise and Learning: Ground-truth Performance Results for Math Data Corpus. Proceedings of the 15th ACM on International Conference on Multimodal Interaction (2013), 569--574.
[9]
Oviatt, S. 2013. The Design of Future Educational Interfaces. Routledge.
[10]
Oviatt, S., Arthur, A., Brock, Y. and Cohen, J. 2007. Expressive Pen-based Interfaces for Math Education. Proceedings of the 8th Iternational Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA, 2007), 573--582.
[11]
Oviatt, S. and Cohen, A. 2013. Written and Multimodal Representations As Predictors of Expertise and Problem-solving Success in Mathematics. Proceedings of the 15th ACM on International Conference on Multimodal Interaction (2013), 599--606.
[12]
Oviatt, S., Cohen, A., Miller, A., Hodge, K. and Mann, A. 2012. The Impact of Interface Affordances on Human Ideation, Problem Solving, and Inferential Reasoning. ACM Transactions on Computer Human Interaction. 19, 3 (Oct. 2012), 22:1--22:30.
[13]
Oviatt, S., Cohen, A. and Weibel, N. 2013. Multimodal Learning Analytics: Description of Math Data Corpus for ICMI Grand Challenge Workshop. Proceedings of the 15th ACM on International Conference on Multimodal Interaction (2013), 563--568.
[14]
Witten, I.H., Frank, E. and Hall, M.A. 2011. Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques. Elsevier.
[15]
Worsley, M. and Blikstein, P. 2011. What's an Expert? Using learning analytics to identify emergent markers of expertise through automated speech, sentiment and sketch analysis. Proceedings for the 4th Annual Conference on Educational Data Mining (Netherlands, 2011), 235--240.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Measuring Collaboration Quality Through Audio Data and Learning AnalyticsUnobtrusive Observations of Learning in Digital Environments10.1007/978-3-031-30992-2_6(91-110)Online publication date: 14-Jun-2023
  • (2023)Time-Series Multidimensional Dialogue Feature Visualization Method for Group WorkSoftware Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing 2022-Winter10.1007/978-3-031-26135-0_6(59-76)Online publication date: 5-May-2023
  • (2022)Modeling Users' Cognitive Performance Using Digital Pen FeaturesFrontiers in Artificial Intelligence10.3389/frai.2022.7871795Online publication date: 3-May-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
MLA '14: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM workshop on Multimodal Learning Analytics Workshop and Grand Challenge
November 2014
68 pages
ISBN:9781450304887
DOI:10.1145/2666633
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 12 November 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. domain expertise
  2. machine learning.
  3. math data corpus
  4. multimodal learning analytics
  5. pen signal analysis
  6. prediction methodology

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

ICMI '14
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

MLA '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 3 of 3 submissions, 100%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 3 of 3 submissions, 100%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)20
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 28 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Measuring Collaboration Quality Through Audio Data and Learning AnalyticsUnobtrusive Observations of Learning in Digital Environments10.1007/978-3-031-30992-2_6(91-110)Online publication date: 14-Jun-2023
  • (2023)Time-Series Multidimensional Dialogue Feature Visualization Method for Group WorkSoftware Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing 2022-Winter10.1007/978-3-031-26135-0_6(59-76)Online publication date: 5-May-2023
  • (2022)Modeling Users' Cognitive Performance Using Digital Pen FeaturesFrontiers in Artificial Intelligence10.3389/frai.2022.7871795Online publication date: 3-May-2022
  • (2022)Towards Collaborative Convergence: Quantifying Collaboration Quality with Automated Co-located Collaboration AnalyticsLAK22: 12th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference10.1145/3506860.3506922(358-369)Online publication date: 21-Mar-2022
  • (2021)Towards Automatic Collaboration Analytics for Group Speech Data Using Learning AnalyticsSensors10.3390/s2109315621:9(3156)Online publication date: 2-May-2021
  • (2021)Assessing Cognitive Test Performance Using Automatic Digital Pen Features AnalysisProceedings of the 29th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization10.1145/3450613.3456812(33-43)Online publication date: 21-Jun-2021
  • (2021)I Know What You Know: What Hand Movements Reveal about Domain ExpertiseACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems10.1145/342304911:1(1-26)Online publication date: 15-Mar-2021
  • (2021)Explainable Automatic Evaluation of the Trail Making Test for Dementia ScreeningProceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3411764.3445046(1-9)Online publication date: 6-May-2021
  • (2021)Literature Review on Co-Located Collaboration Modeling Using Multimodal Learning Analytics—Can We Go the Whole Nine Yards?IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies10.1109/TLT.2021.309776614:3(367-385)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2021
  • (2020)Digital Pen Features Predict Task Difficulty and User Performance of Cognitive TestsProceedings of the 28th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization10.1145/3340631.3394839(23-32)Online publication date: 7-Jul-2020
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media