Andy Cockburn
- 1.C Allen. The use of video in 0rg~oizational studies: A CM SIGCHI Bulletin: Special Edition on Fideo as a Research and Design Tool, 21(2):115-117, 1989. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- 2.T Brinek and LM Gomez. A eoUabortion medium for the support of conversational props. In Proceedings of the I992 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, October 31 toNovember 4.Toronto, Canada., pages 171-178, 1992. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 3.TS Chua and LQ Ruan. A video retrieval and sequencing system. A CM Transactions on Information Systems, 13(4):373--407, 1995. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 4.AJE Dale. A miero-c0ntroller interface for eontrol-i devices. Technical Report TR-COSC 06/97, Department of Computer Science, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand, 1997. http://www. Cost. canterbury, ac. nz/~ tony/tr9 7 0 6. htmlGoogle Scholar
- 5.JD Gould, J Conti, and T Hovanyeez. Composing letters with a simulated listening typewriter. Communications of the A CM, 26(4):295-308, 1983. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 6.C Gutwin, G Stark, and S G-reenberg. Support for workspaee awareness in educational groupware. In A CM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Learning (CSCL '95). Bloomington, Indiana. October 17-20, 1995, pages 147-156. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Ine, October 1995. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 7.BL Harrison. Video annotation and multimedia interfaces: From theory to practice. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 35th Annual General Meetingi pages 319--322, 1991.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 8.H ishii, M Kobayashi, and J Grudin. Integration of inter-personal space and shared workspaee: Clearboard design and experiments. In Proceedings of the 1992 A CM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, October 31 to November 4.Toronto, Canada., pages 33--42, 1992. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 9.S Kennedy. Using video in the bnr usability lab. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin: Special Edition on Fideo as a Re. search and Design Tool, 21(2):92-95, 1989. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 10.S Lewis, M Mateas, S Palmiter, and G Lynch. Ethno. graphic data for product development: A collaborative process. Interactions, 6(3):52-69, 1996. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 11.WE Mackay. Eva: An experimental video annotator for symbolic analysis of video data. A CM SIGCHIBttl. letin: Special Edition on Fideo as a Research and Design Tool, 21(2):68--71, 1989. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 12.M Mantei. Groupware: Interface design for meetings (PANEL). In Proceedings of CHI'88 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 161-163, 1988. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 13.F Martin. Mini board technical reference. MIT Media lab, 20 Ames St, E15-301, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA, 1995. http://lcs.www.media. mit. edu/people/fredm/papers/mbGoogle Scholar
- 14.L Neal. The use of video in empirical research. A CM SIGCHI Bulletin: Special Edition on Fideo as a Re. search and Design Tool, 21 (2): 100--I 0 I, 1989. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 15.:I Nielsen. Finding usability problems through heuristic evaluation. In Proceedings of CHI'92 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Monterey, May 3-7, pages 373-380. Addison-Wesley, 1992. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 16.JK Ousterhout. An Introduction to Tcl and Tk. Addison- Wesley, 1993.Google Scholar
- 17.I Posner and RM Baeeker. A survey of video analysis research and tools and the timelines program: Exploring the state of the art in exploratory sequential data analysis, 1995. Available from Ron Baeeker: Dynamic Graphics Project, University of Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
- 18.J Rosehelle. Jeremy rosehelle's home page. WWW page: http://www.slip.net/'jeremy/, 1996. For information on CVideo, write to: 4104 24th Street #344, San Francisco CA 94114. USA.Google Scholar
- 19.MRoseman and S Greenberg. Building real time groupware with GroupKit, a groupware toolkit. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 3(1):66-106, 1996. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 20.P Sanderson, J Scott, T Johnston, J Mainzer, L Watanade, and J James. Maeshapa and the enterprise of exploratory sequential data analysis (~sda). International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 41(5):633-681, 1994. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 21.M Stef~ G Foster, K Kahn, DG Bobrow, S Lanning, and L Suchman. Beyond the chalkboard: Computer support for collaboration and problem solving in meetings. In I Greif, editor, Computer Supported Cooperative Work: .4 BookofReadings, pages 334-366. Morgan Kaufmann, 1988. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 22.A Takeuchi and T Naito. Situated facial displays: Toward social interaction. InProceedings of CI-1I'95 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Denver, May %11, pages 450-455, 1995. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 23.JC Tang. Listing, Drawing, and Gesturing in Design: A Study of the Use of Shared Workspaces by Design Teams. Phi) thesis, Stanford University, 1989.Google Scholar
- 24.2C Tang. Findings from observational studies of collaborative work. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 34:143-160, 1991. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 25.DG Tatar, G Foster, and DG Bobrow. Design for conversation: Lessons from cognoter. International Jourhal of Man-Machine Studies, 34(2):185--209, 1991. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 26.RH Trigg. Computer support for trameribing recorded activity. A CM SIGCHI Bulletin: Special Edition on Pideo as a Research and Design Tool, 21(2):72-74, 1989. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 27.K Weber and A Poon. Marquee: A tool for real-time video logging. In Proceedings of Ct~'94 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Boston, April 24-28, pages 58--64. Addison-Wesley, 1994. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- CEVA: a tool for collaborative video analysis
Recommendations
Investigating teamwork and taskwork in single- and multi-display groupware systems
Multi-display groupware (MDG) systems, which typically comprise both public and personal displays, promise to enhance collaboration, yet little is understood about how they differ in use from single-display groupware (SDG) systems. While research has ...
Collaboard: a remote collaboration groupware device featuring an embodiment-enriched shared workspace
GROUP '10: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group WorkIn this paper we present a mixed presence groupware device called "CollaBoard". The device improves collaboration between co-located and remote partners by providing a high level of workspace awareness. This is achieved by superimposing a life-size ...
The Use of Cooperation Scenarios in the Design and Evaluation of a CSCW System
Design and evaluation of groupware systems raise questions which do not have to be addressed in the context of single user systems. The designer has to take into account not only the interaction of a single user with the computer, but also the computer-...
Comments