skip to main content
10.1145/2671470.2671480acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesergo-iaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Using a scalable mock-up unit to consider ergonomics aspects during industrial vehicles design process

Authors Info & Claims
Published:15 October 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

The automotive industry is so competitive that new vehicles must quickly be proposed. Toward this ends, conception processes enhancing an early involvement of several professions were developed. Ergonomics is one of these professions and its early considerations, when designing a vehicle, can mostly be based on numerical intermediaries' objects of the vehicle and the future user. Even though the use of numerical tools is widespread, physical prototypes are still required in the automotive industry in order to validate ergonomics aspects of the vehicle. However, these prototypes are expansive, complex to implement and only take part in a late stage of conception. In this context, the current article presents the potential contribution of a multi-scale mockup that could be used in order to early take into account ergonomics aspects when designing a technical vehicle. The originality of this mock-up lies in the fact that it is scalable and easy to implement. Doing so, it can thus, contrary to traditional physical mock-ups, be used early during the conception process.

References

  1. Abdel-Malek, K., Yang, J., Kim, J. H., Marler, T., Beck, S., Swan, C., & Arora, J. (2007). Development of the virtual-human SantosTM. Digital Human Modeling (p. 490--499). Berlin Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Best, R., Begg, R. (2006). Overview of movement analysis and gait geatures. Dans Begg, R., Palaniswami, M. (dir.), Computational Intelligence for Movement Sciences: Neural Networks and Other Emerging Techniques. (p.1--69). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bremmer, R. (1999). Cutting-edge platforms. Financial Times Automotive World, 9, 30--38.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Carter, D. E., Baker, B. S. (1992). CE, concurrent engineering: the product development environment for the 1990s. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Causse, J., Wang, X., & Denninger, L. (2012). An experimental investigation on the requirement of roof height and sill width for car ingress and egress. Ergonomics, 55(12), 1596--611.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Causse, J., Wang, X., & Denninger, L. (2011, June). Effects of roof height on car ingress/egress movement. Communication présentée au 1st International Symposium on Digital Human Modeling (DHM2011), Lyon, France.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Chateauroux, E. (2009). Analysis of the accessibility movement to a car driver seat -- Focus on the older driver case. (Thèse de doctorat de l'Institut National des Sciences Appliquées, Lyon, 246 pages). Repéré à http://www.inrets.fr/fileadmin/ur/LBMC/Ergo/Pdf/These_Chateauroux.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Chateauroux, E., Wang, P. (2010). Car egress analysis of younger and older drivers for motion simulation. Applied Ergonomics, 42(1), 169--177.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Chateauroux, E., Wang, X., & Pudlo, P. (2007). Age and gender effects on joint ranges of motion of the main joints involved in car accessibility movements. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, 10, 177--178.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Chometon, A. (2011). Architecture automobile: tendances, évolutions, sécurité, design, ergonomie, confort, performances, hybridation. Paris: Ellipses Edition Marketing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Damsgaard, M., Rasmussen, J., Christensen, S. T., Surma, E., & de Zee, M. (2006). Analysis of musculoskeletal systems in the AnyBody Modeling System. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 14(8), 1100--1111.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Department of transport (1985). Ins and outs of car Choice. A guide for Elderly and Disabled People. London: Department of Transport at the Transport and Road Research Laboratory, Crowthorne, Berkshire England.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Détienne, F., Baker, M. & Burkhardt, J. M. (2012). Quality of collaboration in design meetings: methodological reflexions. CoDesign: International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts. 8(4), 247--26.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Parlement européen et du conseil. (2007). Directive du Parlement européen et du Conseil du 5 septembre 2007 établissant un cadre pour la réception des véhicules à moteur, de leurs remorques et des systèmes, des composants et des entités techniques destinés à ces véhicules (Directive 2007/46/CE).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Giacomin, J., Quattrocolo, S. (1997). An analysis of human comfort when entering and exiting the rear seat of an automobile. Applied Ergonomics. 28(5-6), 397--406.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Hignett, S. (1998). Ergonomics. Dans Pitt-Brooke, J., Reid, H., Lockwood J., Kerr, K. (dir.), Rehabilitation of Movement: Theoretical Basis of Clinical Practice. (p. 480--486). London: W. B Saunders Company Ltd.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Hignett, S., McAtamney, L. (2000). Rapid entire body assessment (REBA). Applied Ergonomics, 31 (2), 201--205.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Höök, O., Van Heijne, C. (1971). Problems of car usage for elderly people. An ergonomic study concerning car door size. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 3, 178--182.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Institute for Consumer Ergonomics (1985). Problems experienced by disabled and elderly people entering and leaving cars (TRRL Research Report 2). Transport and Road Research Laboratory: Crowthorne, Berkshire.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. ISO - International Organization for Standardization. (2010). Ergonomics of human-system interaction - part 210: human-centred design for interactive systems (ISO 9241-210:2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Kawaja, K., Smith, S., Davis, D., & Smiley, A. (2006). A rural mail box delivery ergonomic risk assessment for the Canadian Union of Postal Workers. Canada Post Corporation/National Joint Health and Safety Committee. Repéré à http://ruralmailcarriers.ca/RMBErgonomicRiskAssessmentPtOne.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Lempereur, M. (2006). Simulation du mouvement d'entrée dans un véhicule automobile (Thèse de doctorat, Université de Valenciennes et de Hainaut Cambrésis, 242 pages). Repéré à http://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/33/80/87/PDF/THESE_-_Mathieu_Lempereur_-_Final.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. McAtamney, L., Hignett, S. (1995, December). REBA: a rapid entire body assessment method for investigating work related musculoskeletal disorders. Communication présentée à la 31st Annual Conference of the Ergonomics Society of Australia, Gleneg, South Australia.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Motmans, R. (2005). Body dimensions of the belgian population {online}. Repéré à http://www.dinbelg.be.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Pahl, G., Beitz, W. (1996). Engineering design: A systematic approach, Berlin Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Perrin, J. (2001). Concevoir l'innovation industrielle: Méthodologie de conception de l'innovation. France: CNRS.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Prasad, B. (1996). Concurrent Engineering Fundamentals. Upper Saddle River, NJ: PTR Prentice Hall.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Robertson, D., Ulrich, K. (1998). Planning for product platforms. Sloan Management Review, 39(4).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Sagot, J. C. (1999). Ergonomie et conception anthropocentrée. (Mémoire d'Habilitation à diriger des Recherches de l'Institut National Polytechnique de Lorraine, 267 pages).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Shen, W., Parsons, K. C. (1997). Validity and reliability of rating scales for seated pressure discomfort. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 20, 441--461.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Simoneau, S., St Vincent, M., & Chicoine, D. (1996). Les LATR: mieux les comprendre pour mieux les prévenir. Montréal, Canada: IRSST.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Vieira, E. R., Kumar, S. (2004). Working postures: a literature review. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation. 14, 143--159.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Weber, J. (2009). Automotive Development Processes: Processes for Successful Customer Oriented Vehicle Development. Munich, Germany: Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Using a scalable mock-up unit to consider ergonomics aspects during industrial vehicles design process

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            Ergo'IA '14: Proceedings of the 2014 Ergonomie et Informatique Avancée Conference - Design, Ergonomie et IHM: quelle articulation pour la co-conception de l'interaction
            October 2014
            139 pages
            ISBN:9781450329705
            DOI:10.1145/2671470

            Copyright © 2014 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 15 October 2014

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
          • Article Metrics

            • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
            • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

            Other Metrics

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader