ABSTRACT
Crowdfunding sites often impose deadlines for projects to receive their requested funds. This deadline structure creates a difficult decision for potential donors. Donors can donate early to a project to help it reach its goal and to signal to other donors that the project is worthwhile. But donors may also want to wait for a similar signal from others. We conduct an experimental simulation of a crowdfunding website to explore how potential donors to projects make this decision. We find evidence for both strategies in our experiment; some donate early while others wait till the last second. However, we also find that making an early donation is usually a better strategy for donors because the amount of donations made early in a project's campaign is often the only difference between that project being funded or not. This finding suggests that crowdfunding sites need to develop designs, policies and incentives that encourage people to make immediate donations so that the site can most efficiently fund projects.
- Agrawal, A., Catalini, C., and Goldfarb, A. The geography of crowdfunding. NBER Working Paper #16820, February 2011.Google Scholar
- Agrawal, A. K., Catalini, C., and Goldfarb, A. Some simple economics of crowdfunding. Tech. rep., National Bureau of Economic Research, 2013.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Andreoni, J. Why free ride?: Strategies and learning in public goods experiments. Journal of Public Economics 37, 3 (1988), 291--304.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Andreoni, J. Philanthropy. In Handbook of Giving, Reciprocity, and Altruism. Elsivier / North Holland, 2005.Google Scholar
- Andreoni, J. Leadership giving in charitable fundraising. Journal of Public Economics 8, 1 (2006), 1--22.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Belleflamme, P., Lambert, T., and Schwienbacher, A. Crowdfunding: Tapping the right crowd. Tech. Rep. 1578175, Social Science Research Network (SSRN), April 2012.Google Scholar
- Gerber, E. M., and Hui, J. Crowdfunding: Motivations and deterrents for participation. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 20, 6 (2013), 34. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Greenberg, M., and Gerber, E. Crowdfunding: A survey and taxonomy. Tech. Rep. 12-03, Northwestern University Segal Design Institute, 2012.Google Scholar
- Greenberg, M. D., and Gerber, E. M. Learning to fail: experiencing public failure online through crowdfunding. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM (2014), 581--590. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hui, J. S., Greenberg, M. D., and Gerber, E. M. Understanding the role of community in crowdfunding work. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, CSCW '14, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2014), 62--74. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jian, L., and Usher, N. Crowd-funded journalism. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 19, 2 (January 2014).Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kickstarter. Statistics. http://www.kickstarter.com/help/stats, June 2014.Google Scholar
- Kuppuswamy, V., and Bayus, B. L. Crowdfunding creative ideas: the dynamics of projects backers in kickstarter. SSRN Electronic Journal (2013).Google Scholar
- Mitra, T., and Gilbert, E. The language that gets people to give: Phrases that predict success on kickstarter. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, CSCW '14, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2014), 49--61. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mollick, E. The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing 29, 1 (2014), 1--16.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Pak, C., and Wash, R. Importance of recent experience and initial overconfidence:factors of crowdfundiners' limited learning. Working Paper, June 2014.Google Scholar
- Shin, J., and Jian, L. Driving forces behind readers' donation to crowd-funded journalism: The case of spot.us. Working paper, University of Southern California, 2012.Google Scholar
- Smith, V. L. Experimental economics: Induced value theory. American Economic Review 66, 2 (May 1976), 274--279.Google Scholar
- Wash, R. The value of completing crowdfunding projects. In International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM), AAAI Press (July 2013).Google Scholar
- Wash, R., and Solomon, J. Coordinating donors on crowdfunding websites. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, CSCW '14, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2014), 38--48. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Xu, A., Yang, X., Rao, H., Fu, W.-T., Huang, S.-W., and Bailey, B. P. Show me the money!: An analysis of project updates during crowdfunding campaigns. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '14, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2014), 591--600. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Zhang, J., and Liu, P. Rational herding in microloan markets. Management science 58, 5 (2012), 892--912. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Don't Wait!: How Timing Affects Coordination of Crowdfunding Donations
Recommendations
Coordinating donors on crowdfunding websites
CSCW '14: Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computingCrowdfunding websites like Kickstarter, Spot.Us and Donor's Choose seek to fund multiple projects simultaneously by soliciting donations from a large number of donors. Crowdfunding site designers must decide what to do with donations to projects that ...
The Power of Collective Endorsements: Credibility Factors in Medical Crowdfunding Campaigns
CHI '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsTraditional medical fundraising charities have been relying on third-party watchdogs and carefully crafting their reputation over time to signal their credibility to potential donors. As medical fundraising campaigns migrate to online platforms in the ...
Creative Transactions: Special Digital Monies in ‘Break Kickstarter’ Crowdfunding Campaigns
CHI '21: Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsThis paper conceptualizes ‘creative transactions’ – payment for creative work – as a rich site for the study, design and innovation of new financial technologies, and ‘special digital monies’. For most, creative labor remains highly precarious and ...
Comments