skip to main content
10.1145/2676467.2676514acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmindtrekConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Body-touching: an embodied interaction technique for health information systems in developing regions

Published:04 November 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present a study of using embodied health information system for developing regions focusing on users not familiar with technology. We designed and developed a health information system with two gesture-based selection techniques: pointing to a screen and touching one's own body part. We evaluated the prototype in user study with 37 semi-literate and literate participants. Our results indicate a clear preference (76%) for touching in the healthcare domain. Based on our observations and user feedback, we present four design guidelines for developing embodied systems for the developing world: designing body-centric interaction to overcome literacy and technological proficiency barriers, addressing the misconceptions of system behaviors with users not familiar with technology, understanding effects of cultural constraints on interaction, and utilizing interactive virtual avatars to connect with the users.

References

  1. Agarwal, S. K., Dhanesha, K., Jain, A., Kumar, A., Menon, S., Rajput, N., & Srivastava, S. Organizational, social and operational implications in delivering ICT solutions: a telecom web case-study. In Proc. ICTD '10, ACM (2010), Article 2. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Agarwal, S. K., Kumar, A., Nanavati, A. A., and Rajput, N. User Generated Content Creation and Dissemination in Rural Areas. International Journal of Information Technology and International Development, 6, 2 (2010), 21--37.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown, D., Marsden, G., and Rivett, U. WATER alert!: using mobile phones to improve community perspective on drinking water quality in South Africa. In Proc. ICTD '12, ACM (2012), 230--240. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Chen, X., Marquardt, N., Tang, A., Boring, S., Greenberg, S.: Extending a Mobile Device's Interaction Space Through Body-Centric Interaction. In Proc. MobileHCI '12, ACM (2012), 151--160. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Frohlich, D. M., Rachovides, D., Riga, K., Bhat, R., Frank, M., Edirisinghe, E., Wickramanayaka, D., Matt, J., and Harwood, W. StoryBank: mobile digital storytelling in a development context. In Proc. CHI'09, ACM (2009), 1761--1770. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Grover, A. S., Plauché, M., Barnard, E., Kuun, C.: HIV health information access using spoken dialogue systems: Touchtone vs. speech. In Information and Communication Technologies and Development, IEEE (2009), 95--107. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Grudin, J. Digitally mediated interaction: Technology and the urge system. In G. Hatano, N. Okada & H. Tanabe (Eds.), Affective minds, Elsevier (2000), 159--167.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Hakulinen, J., Heimonen, T., Turunen, M., Keskinen, T., Miettinen, T. Gesture and Speech-based Public Display for Cultural Event Exploration. In Proc. of the Tilburg Gesture Research Meeting (TiGER'13), (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Hart, S. G. NASA-Task Load Index (NASA-TLX); 20 Years Later. In Proc. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 50th Annual Meeting, HFES (2006), 904--908.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Heimonen, T., Hakulinen, J., Turunen, M., Jokinen, J. P., Keskinen, T., & Raisamo, R. Designing Gesture-Based Control for Factory Automation. In Proceedings of INTERACT'13. Springer (2013), 202--209.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Jensen, K. L, Marsden, G., Cutrell, E., Jones, M., and Morrison, A. NUIs for new worlds: new interaction forms and interfaces for mobile applications in developing countries. In CHI '12 Extended Abstracts, ACM (2012), 2779--2782. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Jota, R., Nacenta, M. A., Jorge, J. A., Carpendale, S., and Greenberg, S. A comparison of ray pointing techniques for very large displays. In Proc. GI '10, Canadian Information Processing Society (2010), 269--276. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Kam, M., Mathur, A., Kumar, A., and Canny, J. Designing digital games for rural children: a study of traditional village games in India. In Proc. CHI '09, ACM (2009), 31--40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Karam, M. & schraefel, M. C. A taxonomy of gestures in human-computer interaction. Technical report, Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton (2005).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Larson, M., Rajput, N., Singh, A., and Srivastava, S. I want to be Sachin Tendulkar!: a spoken english cricket game for rural students. In Proc. CSCW '13, ACM (2013), 1353--1364. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Medhi, I., Gautama, S. N., and Toyama, K. A comparison of mobile money-transfer UIs for non-literate and semi-literate users. In Proc. CHI'09. ACM (2009), 1741--1750. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Menon, D., Kiri, K., Toyama, K. Rural PC Kiosks: Who Benefits and How? New Delhi: Indian Telecentre Forum (2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Myers, B., Bhatnagar, R., Nichols, J., Peck, C. H., Kong, D., Miller, R., and Long, C. Interacting at a distance: measuring the performance of laser pointers and other devices. In Proc. CHI '02, ACM (2002), 33--40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Parker, J. K., Mandryk, R. L., & Inkpen, K. M. TractorBeam: seamless integration of local and remote pointing for tabletop displays. In Proc. GI '05, Canadian Human-Computer Communications Society (2005), 33--40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Patil, A. V., Somasundaram, K. V. and Goyal, R. C. Current health scenario in rural India. Australian Journal of Rural Health (2002), 10: 129--135.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Quek, F., McNeill, D., Bryll, R., Duncan, S., Ma, X.-F. Kirbas, C., McCullough, K. E., and Ansari, R. Multimodal human discourse: gesture and speech. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 9, 3 (September 2002), 171--193. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Rangaswamy, N. & Toyama, K., Sociology of ICT: The myth of the hibernating village. In Proc. HCII '05, Las Vegas, (2005).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Ruohonen, M., Turunen, M., Linna, J., Hakulinen, J., Nanavati, A., and Rajput, N. E-Inclusion Innovation for Rural India - Mobile Voice and Tablet Based Educational Services. In Proc. IFIP World Conference on Computers in Education, vol. 2 (2013), 218--227.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Shoemaker, G., Tsukitani, T., Kitamura, Y., & Booth, K. S. Body-centric interaction techniques for very large wall displays. In Proc. NordiCHI '10, ACM (2010), 463--472. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Sey, A., & Fellows, M. Literature review on the impact of public access to information and communication technologies. Center for Information & Society, University of Washington, Seattle, (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Sherwani, J., Ali, N., Mirza, S., Fatma, A., Memon, Y., Karim, M., & Rosenfeld, R. Healthline: Speech-based access to health information by low-literate users. In Proc. ICTD '07, IEEE (2007), 1--9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Sorathia, K., Jain, M., Amrit, M., George, D., Kumar, J., & Ranjan, A. Research Findings, Analysis and Design Opportunities for Empowerment of Maternal Health in Assam, India. Third IUI4DR Workshop, in Conjunction with IUI, Santa Monica, CA, USA, (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Tse, E., Hancock, M., & Greenberg, S. Speech-filtered bubble ray: improving target acquisition on display walls. In Proc. ICMI '07, ACM (2007), 307--314. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Turunen, M., Hakulinen, J., Ståhl, O., Gambäck, B., Hansen, P-. Rodriguez Gancedo, M. C. Santos de la camara, R., Smith, C., Charlton, D., Cavazza, M. Multimodal and Mobile Conversational Health and Fitness Companions. Computer Speech & Language, 25(2), (2011) 192--209. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Vogel, D. & Balakrishnan, R. Distant freehand pointing and clicking on very large, high resolution displays. In Proc. UIST '05, ACM (2005), 33--42. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. WHO. Global Health Observatory Data Repository. http://apps.who.int/gho/data/view.main.92100Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Body-touching: an embodied interaction technique for health information systems in developing regions

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        AcademicMindTrek '14: Proceedings of the 18th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Media Business, Management, Content & Services
        November 2014
        316 pages
        ISBN:9781450330060
        DOI:10.1145/2676467
        • General Chair:
        • Artur Lugmayr

        Copyright © 2014 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 4 November 2014

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate110of207submissions,53%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader