skip to main content
10.1145/2676585.2676595acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessoictConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Constructing keywords network for query-by-example mode text searching

Authors Info & Claims
Published:04 December 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Text searching, categorization, and summarization are important problems in information retrieval research. One of the most common approaches to text analysis is to exploit the term frequency-inverse document frequency (tf-idf) vector model, which is very effective and efficient in representing a large document through a small vector. The tf-idf approach has the crucial drawback that it only considers the text in terms of the structure of composition. However, each natural language has its own syntactic structure. Thus, it is not sufficient to replace the text with a set of important keywords without taking into account their relative relation to the thesis and meaning of the text. In this paper, we propose a text search model based on a keyword graph model, which is based on the cognitive process (writing) model. We show how to construct a keyword graph from a text by assigning edges between two vertices (keywords) if their regions of influence overlap. Our approach allows the use of the text as a query attribute. In our model, if a user wants to find text similar to a given query text in a large repository, the query document can be searched without selecting keywords. This query-by-example in text searching is an important contribution of our work. Experiments show that our keyword graph model is superior to the tf-idf model in clearly and effectively revealing the similarity between documents. Our experiments use more than 2,000 speeches obtained from the United States White House, and show that our approach is superior to prevalent text search methods in terms of accuracy of syntactic similarity and the semantic structure of object texts.

References

  1. R. Angelova and G. Weikum. Graph-based text classification: Learn from your neighbors. In Proc. ACM SIGIR, pages 485--492, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. N. Azam and J. Yao. Comparison of term frequency and document frequency based feature selection metrics in text categorization. Expert Systems with Applications, 39: 4760--4768, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. M. Bastian, S. Heymann, and M. Jacomy. Gephi: An open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. In Proc. of 3rd ICWSM, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. N. L. Bigot, J.-M. Passerault, and T. Olive. Memory for words location in writing. Psychological Research, 73: 89--97, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. J. A. Bullinaria and J. P. Levy. Extracting semantic representations from word co-occurrence statistics: Stop-lists, stemming and svd. Behavior Research Methods, 2012, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. H. Bunke and X. Jiang. Graph matching and similarity. International Series in Intelligent Technologies Volume, 15: 281--304, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. W. B. Canvar and J. M. Trenkle. N-gram-based text categorization. In Proc. SDAIR, pages 161--175, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. J. Choi, S. Yi, and K. C. Lee. Analysis of keyword networks in MIS research and implications for predicting knowledge evolution. Information & Management, 48: 371--381, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. C. Collins, S. Carpendale, and G. Penn. Graph similarity scoring and matching. Applied Mathematics Letters, 21: 86--94, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. C. Collins, S. Carpendale, and G. Penn. Docuburst: Visualizing document content using language structure. Eurographics/ IEEE-VGTC Symposium on Visualization, 29: 1042--1046, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. D. K. Elson, N. Dames, and K. R. McKeown. Extracting social networks from literary fiction. In Proc. of 48th ACL, pages 138--147, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. G. Erkan and D. R. Radev. LexRank: Graph-based lexical centrality as salience in text summarization. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 22: 457--479, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. L. Flower and J. R. Hayes. A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32: 365--387, 1981.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. A. Garg, P. Bhattacharyya, C. U. Martel, and S. F. Wu. Information flow and search in unstructed keyword based social networks. In Proc. CSE, pages 1074--1081, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Y. Guo, Z. Shao, and N. Hua. Automated text categorization based on content analysis with cognitive situation models. Information Sciences, 180: 613--630, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. A. Hassan, A. A. Jbara, and D. Radev. Extracting signed social networks from text. In Proc. TextGraph, pages 6--14, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. M. S. Hossain and R. A. Angryk. GDClust: A graph-based document clustering technique. In Proc. IEEE ICDM, pages 417--422, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. C. Jiang, F. Coenen, R. Sanderson, and M. Zito. Text classification using graph mining-based feature extraction. Knowledge-Based Systems, 23: 302--308, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. J.-Y. Jiang, S.-C. Tsai, and S.-J. Lee. FSKNN: Multi-label text categorization based on fuzzy similarity and k nearest neighbors. Expert Systems with Applications, 39: 2813--2821, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. S. Jiang, G. Pang, M. Wu, and L. Kuang. An improved k-nearest-neighbor algorithm for text categorization. Expert Systems with Applications, 39: 1503--1509, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. C. H. Li, J. C. Yang, and S. C. Park. Text categorization algorithms using semantic approaches, corpus-based thesaurus and WordNet. Expert Systems with Applications, 39: 765--772, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. C. D. Manning, T. Grow, T. Grenager, J. Finkel, and J. Bauer. Stanford tokenizer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. F. Sebastiani. Machine learning in automated text categorization. ACM Computing Surveys, 34(1): 1--47, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. J. Seo, G.-M. Park, and H. G. Cho. Characteristic analysis of social network constructed from literary fiction(to appear). In Proc. Cyber World 2013, Japan, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. J. K. Seo, G.-M. Park, S.-H. Kim, and H.-G. Cho. Characteristic analysis of social network constructed from literary fiction. In International Conference on Cyberworlds 2013, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. S.-Y. Yang and V.-W. Soo. Extract conceptual graphs from plain texts in patent claims. Engineering Applications and Artificial Intelligence, 25: 874--887, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Y. Yang and X. Liu. A re-examination of text categorization methods. In Proc. SIGIR, pages 42--49, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Y. Yang and J. O. Pedersen. A comparative study on feature selection in text categorization. In Proc. ICML, pages 412--420, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    SoICT '14: Proceedings of the 5th Symposium on Information and Communication Technology
    December 2014
    304 pages
    ISBN:9781450329309
    DOI:10.1145/2676585

    Copyright © 2014 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 4 December 2014

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate147of318submissions,46%
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader