skip to main content
10.1145/2676723.2677308acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessigcseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Introducing Computing Concepts to Non-Majors: A Case Study in Gothic Novels

Published: 24 February 2015 Publication History

Abstract

This paper presents an approach to integrating computer science and quantitative literacy concepts in an undergraduate English Literature course. We show how students with no prior background in computer science can engage in computing activities directly related to their topic of interest and gain a deeper understanding of their topic as well as a better appreciation and understanding of computer science and quantitative literacy in the process. Students work in an interdisciplinary learning environment focusing on literary analysis and quantitative literacy with computing concepts acting as the bridge between the two areas.

References

[1]
C. Alvarado and Z. Dodds. Women in CS: An evaluation of three promising practices. In Proceedings of SIGCSE'10, pages 57--61, Milwaukee, WI, USA, 2010. ACM.
[2]
V. Barr. Create two, three, many courses: An experiment in contextualized introductory computer science. J. Comput. Sci. Coll., 27(6):19--25, June 2012.
[3]
C. Barrowman et al. Critical Theory as Critical Thinking: A Book of Classroom Practice in Literary Criticism. Alverno College, Milwaukee, WI, USA, 2010.
[4]
M. Bosch. Mathematics and Science: The relationships and disconnects between research and education. In Compendium for Math and Science., eds C. Winslow, M. Achiam, Copenhagen: Department of Science Education, 2014.
[5]
L. Carter. Why students with an apparent aptitude for computer science don't choose to major in computer science. In Proceedings of SIGCSE'06, pages 27--31, Houston, TX, USA, 2006. ACM.
[6]
L. Carter. Interdisciplinary computing classes: Worth the effort. In Proceedings of SIGCSE'14. Pages 445--450, Atlanta, GA, USA, 2014. ACM.
[7]
P. Charters, M. J. Lee, A. J. Ko, and D. Loksa. Challenging stereotypes and changing attitudes: The effect of a brief programming encounter on adults' attitudes toward programming. In Proceedings of SIGCSE'14, pages 653--658, Atlanta, GA, USA, 2014. ACM.
[8]
CSTA Standards Task Force. CSTA K-12 computer science standards. Association for Computing Machinery, 2011. http://www.acm.org/education/curricula-recommendation.
[9]
Q. Cutts, S. Esper, and B. Simon. Computing as the 4th 'R': A general education approach to computing education. In Proceedings of ICER'11, pages 133--138, Providence, RI, USA, 2011. ACM.
[10]
C. Dierbach, B. Taylor, H. Zhou, and I. Zimand. Experiences with a cs0 course targeted for cs1 success. In Proceedings of SIGCSE'05, pages 317--320, St. Louis, MO, USA, 2005. ACM.
[11]
S. Esper, S. R. Foster, and W. G. Griswold. On the nature of fires and how to spark them when you're not there. In Proceedings of SIGCSE'13, pages 305--310, Denver, CO, USA, 2013. ACM.
[12]
J. Feinberg. Wordle - beautiful word clouds. http://www.wordle.net.
[13]
E. R. Gansner and S. C. North. An open graph visualization system and its applications to software engineering. Software Practice and Experience, 30(11):1203, 2000. www.graphviz.org
[14]
S. Grover, R. Pea, and S. Cooper. Remedying misperceptions of computer science among middle school students. In Proceedings of SIGCSE'14, pages 343--348, Atlanta, GA, USA, 2014. ACM.
[15]
Project Gutenburg Archive. http://www.gutenberg.org/.
[16]
M. Hewner. Undergraduate conceptinos of the field of computer science. In Proceedings of ICER'13, pages 107--114, San Diego, CA, USA, 2013. ACM.
[17]
W. L. Honig. Teaching and assessing programming fundamentals for non majors with visual programming. In Proceedings of ITiCSE'13, pages 40--45, Canterbury, England, UK, 2013. ACM.
[18]
G. P. Landow. Vicorian web. http://www.victorianweb.org/.
[19]
B. Lawson, D. Szajda, and L. Barnett. Introducing computer science in an integrated science course. In Proceedings of SIGCSE'13, pages 341--346, Denver, CO, USA, 2013. ACM.
[20]
C. D. Martin. Draw a computer scientist. In Working Group Reports from ITiCSE'04, pages11--12, Leeds, UK, 2004. ACM.
[21]
M. Mentkowski. Leaerning That Lasts: Integrating Learning, Development, And Performance In College And Beyond. Jossey-Bass, 1999.
[22]
A. Mitchell, H. C. Purchase, and J. Hamer. Computing science: What do pupils think? In Proceedings of ITiCSE'09, pages 353--353, Paris, France, 2009. ACM.
[23]
T. Newhall, L. Meeden, A. Daner, A. Soni, F. Ruiz, and R. Wicentowski. A support program for introductory CS courses that improves student performance and retains students from underrepresented groups. In Proceedings of SICSES'14, pages 433--438, Atlanta, GA, USA, 2014. ACM.
[24]
Gyeong-Mi Park, Sung-Hwan Kim, Hye-Ryeon Hwang, and Hwan-Gue Cho. Complex System Analysis of Social Networks Extracted from Literary Fictions. International Journal of Machine Learning and Computing, 3(1)107--111, 2013.
[25]
D. Schunk. Learning Theories: An educational perspective. Pearson Education Inc, Boston, MA, 2012.
[26]
E. K. Stage, H. Asturias, T. Cheuk, P. A. Daro, and S. B. Hampton. Opportunities and challenges in next generation standards. Science, 340(6130):276--277, 2013.
[27]
T. Underwook, M. L. Black, L. Auvil, and B. Capitanu. Mapping mutable genres in structurally complex volumes. In Proceedings of BigData'13, pages 95--103. IEEE, 2013.
[28]
M. VanDyne and J. Braun. Effectiveness of a computational thinking (cs0) course on student analytical skills. In Proceedings of SIGCSE'14, pages 133--138, Atlants, GA, USA, 2014. ACM.
[29]
J. Walden, M. Doyle, R. Garns, and Z. Hart. An informatics perspective on computational thinking. In Proceedings of ITiCSE'13, pages 4--9, Canterbury, England, UK, 2013. ACM.
[30]
C. Wilson, L. A. Sudol, C. Stephenson, and M. Stehlik. Running on empty: The failure to teach K-12 computer science in the digital age. ACM, 2010. http://www.acm.org/Runningonempty/.
[31]
S. Yardi and A. Bruckman. What is computing?: Bridging the gap between teenagers' perceptions and graduate students' experiences. In Proceedings of ICER'07, pages 39--50, Atlanta, GA, USA, 2007. ACM.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
SIGCSE '15: Proceedings of the 46th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education
February 2015
766 pages
ISBN:9781450329668
DOI:10.1145/2676723
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 24 February 2015

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. computer science education
  2. network analysis

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

SIGCSE '15
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

SIGCSE '15 Paper Acceptance Rate 105 of 289 submissions, 36%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 1,787 of 5,146 submissions, 35%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 03 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)Geographical Python Teaching Resources: geopyterJournal of Geographical Systems10.1007/s10109-021-00346-6Online publication date: 23-Apr-2021
  • (2020)Arduino-Compatible Modular Kit Design and Implementation for Programming EducationAdvances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal10.25046/aj0505375:5(295-301)Online publication date: 2020
  • (2020)Teaching on JupyterREGION10.18335/region.v7i1.2827:1(21-34)Online publication date: 23-Mar-2020
  • (2019)Design and Evaluation of a Block-based Environment with a Data Science ContextIEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing10.1109/TETC.2017.2729585(1-1)Online publication date: 2019
  • (2018)CS for all academic identitiesJournal of Computing Sciences in Colleges10.5555/3199572.319959033:4(130-137)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2018
  • (2017)Making NoiseACM Inroads10.1145/3095781.30177148:2(60-65)Online publication date: 8-Mar-2017
  • (2017)Making NoiseProceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education10.1145/3017680.3017714(87-92)Online publication date: 8-Mar-2017
  • (2015)Computer Science Meets Social StudiesProceedings of the eleventh annual International Conference on International Computing Education Research10.1145/2787622.2787751(281-282)Online publication date: 9-Jul-2015

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media