ABSTRACT
Semantic Ambiguation refers to the disagreement in meaning of terms used by parties in communication due to polysemy, leading to increased complexity and lesser accuracy in information integration, migration, retrieval and related activities. Semantic Disambiguation can be performed through establishing and reconciling relative positions of parties in communication by matching their terms' meanings to a common domain-specific ontology -- a knowledge representation showing concepts, organized into domains, and relationships between them. In this paper, based on the wide existence and limitations of established hierarchical ontology in a form of Classification Schemes, we proposed a novel ontology structure combining the structured nature of hierarchy with expressive capability of graphs, called Graph-embedded Tree (GeT), and a novel approach to construct a GeT-based Ontology. Evaluation was performed on United States Patent Classification System (USPC); the results showed that the information retrieval backed by GeT-based ontology yields better disambiguation capability than other typical patent search methods.
- A. Halevy, "Why your data won't mix," Queue, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 50--58, 2005. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. P. Sheth and J. A. Larson, "Federated database systems for managing distributed, heterogeneous and autonomous databases," ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), vol. 3, no. 22, pp. 183--236, 1990. Google ScholarDigital Library
- W. Kent, "The many forms of a single fact," in Thirty-fourth IEEE Computer Society International Conference: Intellectual Leverage, Digest of Papers, San Francisco, CA, USA, 1989.Google Scholar
- R. Hull, "Managing semantic heterogeneity in databases: a theoretical prospective," in Proceedings of the sixteenth ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD-SIGACT symposium on Principles of database systems, ACM, Tucson, AZ, USA, 1997. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. W. Bright, A. R. Hurson and S. Pakzad, "Automated resolution of semantic heterogeneity in multidatabases," ACM Transactions on Database Systems, vol. II, no. 19, pp. 212--253, 1994. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Garcia-Solaco, Manuel, F. Saltor and M. Castellanos, "Semantic heterogeneity in multidatabase systems," in Object-oriented multidatabase systems, UK, Prentice Hall International, 1995, pp. 129--202. Google ScholarDigital Library
- V. Ventrone, "Semantic heterogeneity as a result of domain evolution," ACM SIGMOD Record, vol. IV, no. 20, pp. 16--20, 1991. Google ScholarDigital Library
- V. Kashyap and A. Sheth, "Semantic heterogeneity in global information systems," in Cooperative Infomration Systems: Current Trends & Directions, Academic Press, 1997.Google Scholar
- F. Hakimpour and A. Geppert, "Resolving semantic heterogeneity in schema integration," in Proceedings of the international conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems-Volume 2001, Ogunquit, ME, USA, 2001. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Bhattacharjee and S. K. Ghosh, "Automatic Resolution of Semantic Heterogeneity in GIS: An Ontology Based Approach," in Advancec Computing, Networking and Informatics, 2014.Google Scholar
- L. Ying, Z. Huimin, L. Hui and Z. Chengli, "Ontology-Based Knowledge Representation for Resolution of Semantic Heterogeneity in GIS," in International Conference on Management of e-Commerce and e-Government, London, UK, 2013.Google Scholar
- Google, "Google Search Engine," Google, {Online}. Available: www.google.com. {Accessed 20 June 2014}.Google Scholar
- Microsoft, "Bing Search Engine," Microsoft, {Online}. Available: www.bing.com. {Accessed 20 June 2014}.Google Scholar
- Yahoo, "Yahoo Search Engine," Yahoo, {Online}. Available: search.yahoo.com. {Accessed 20 June 2014}.Google Scholar
- United States Patent and Trademark Office, "United States Patent Classification System," 16 April 2013. {Online}. Available: http://www.uspto.gov/web/patents/classification/index.htm. {Accessed 12 June 2014}.Google Scholar
- USPTO and EPO, "Cooperative Patent Classification," 1 June 2014. {Online}. Available: http://www.cooperativepatentclassification.org/index.html;jsessionid=kqg6guyifk32. {Accessed 19 June 2014}.Google Scholar
- World Intellectual Property Organization, "International Patent Classification," {Online}. Available: http://www.wipo.int/classifications/ipc/en/. {Accessed 18 June 2014}.Google Scholar
- Association for Computing Machinery, "The 2012 ACM Computing Classification System," {Online}. Available: http://www.acm.org/about/class/class/2012. {Accessed 17 June 2014}.Google Scholar
- Stanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, "Protege," 2014. {Online}. Available: http://protege.stanford.edu/. {Accessed 13 May 2014}.Google Scholar
- A. Farquhar, R. Fikes and J. Rice, "The ontolingua server: A tool for collaborative ontology construction," International journal of human-computer studies, vol. VI, no. 46, pp. 707--727, 1997. Google ScholarDigital Library
- McGuinness, D. L., R. Fikes, J. Rice and S. Wilder, "The chimeara ontology environment," in Proceedings of Seventeenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Twelfth Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence, Austin, Texas, USA, 2000. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Missikoff and F. Taglino, "Symontox: a web-ontology tool for ebusiness domains," in Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Web Information Systems Engineering, 2003. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Maedche and S. Staab, "Ontology learning for the semantic web," IEEE Intelligent systems, vol. II, no. 16, pp. 72--79, 2001. Google ScholarDigital Library
- H. Bohring and S. Auer, "Mapping XML to OWL Ontologies," Leipziger Informatik-Tage, no. 72, pp. 147--156, 2005.Google Scholar
- D. Gasevic, D. Djuric, V. Devedzic and V. Damjanovic, "From UML to ready-to-use OWL ontologies," in Proceedings of 2nd International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Systems, 2004.Google Scholar
- B. Biebow, S. Szulman and A. J. Clement, "TERMINAE: A linguistics-based tool for building of a domain ontology," in Knowledge Acquisition, Modeling and Management, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1999, pp. 49--66. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Nobecourt, "A method to build formal ontologies from texts," EKAW-2000, Juan-Les-Pins, 2000.Google Scholar
- D. Lonsdale, Y. Ding, D. W. Embley and A. Melby, "Peppering knowledge sources with SALT: Boosting conceptual content for ontology generation," in Proceeding of the AAAI Workshop: Semantic Web Meets Language Resources, 2002.Google Scholar
- H. Hu and D.-Y. Liu, "Learning OWL ontologies from free texts," in Proceedings of 2004 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 2004.Google Scholar
- L. Khan and F. Luo, "Ontology Construction for Information Selection," in Proceedings of the 14th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, Washington, 2002. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Princeton University, "About WordNet," 7 November 2013. {Online}. Available: http://wordnet.princeton.edu/. {Accessed 12 May 2014}.Google Scholar
- H. Kong, M. Hwang and P. Kim, "Design of the automatic ontology building system about specific domain knowledge," in Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology, 2006.Google Scholar
- D. I. Moldovan and R. Girju, "Domain-specific knowledge acquisition and classification using wordnet," in Proceedings of 13th International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference, 2000. Google ScholarDigital Library
- E. Agirre, O. Ansa, E. Hovy and D. Martinez, "Enriching Very Large Ontologies Using WWW," in Proceedings of Ontology Learning Workshop, Berlin, 2000.Google Scholar
- M. Cho, H. Kim and P. Kim, "A new method for ontology merging based on concept using wordnet," in Proceedings of 8th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology, 2006.Google Scholar
- J. Kietz, A. Maedche and R. Volz, "A method for semi-automatic ontology acquisition from a corporate intranet," in Proceedings of EKAW-2000 Workship Ontologies and Texts, Juan-Les-Pins, 2000.Google Scholar
- S. B. Navathe and R. Elmasri., Fundamentals of database systems, Pearson Education, 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- GeT-based Ontology Construction for Semantic Disambiguation
Recommendations
Ontology usage analysis in the ontology lifecycle
The Semantic Web envisions a Web where information is accessible and processable by computers as well as humans. Ontologies are the cornerstones for realizing this vision of the Semantic Web by capturing domain knowledge through the defined terms and ...
Ontology View Extraction: An Approach Based on Ontological Meta-properties
ICTAI '14: Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE 26th International Conference on Tools with Artificial IntelligenceOntologies have been applied in Computer Science to ensure the semantic interoperability among multiple systems. With the increasing of ontologies availability, many approaches for promoting the share and reuse of ontologies have been investigated in ...
Semantic oriented ontology cohesion metrics for ontology-based systems
Ontologies play a core role to provide shared knowledge models to semantic-driven applications targeted by Semantic Web. Ontology metrics become an important area because they can help ontology engineers to assess ontology and better control project ...
Comments