ABSTRACT
The 2011-2012 Arab Spring uprising can be considered a new political phenomenon with respect to collective action and the origin of network governance in North Africa and the Middle East. Nevertheless, current formal and empirical models are incapable of analyzing and predicting the future of the uprisings. Therefore, the conceptualization of these models must be reviewed given the increasing need for a political analytical model that can assess the state of the state and consider the influence of non-state actors on service provision and security mechanisms inside their society. The circumstances require a simple conceptual model to describe state status (stable or unstable) in a simple representational form for countries such as Egypt following the Arab Spring.
This study propose a framework to explain the influence of network governance on state stability, it was preferable that this model be general and conceptual. Thus, this framework can offer a more realistic explanation of the political transformations that occurred in the Arab Spring countries, such as Egypt. The analysis showed that formal mathematical models could not persuasively explain the Arab Spring phenomenon because such models are based on theories and ideas that are inapplicable to the changes in the political environment that occurred in these countries. The proposed framework, attempts to describe state status, whereby a state is stable or unstable and it is not necessary for the state to be a failed state. This framework aims to help political analysts develop recommendations for policy- and decision-makers on how to avoid state instability.
- Abdollahian, M, M Baranick, B Efird and J Kugler. A Predictive Political Simulation Model. Center for Technology and National Security Policy, National Defense University. 2006. http://www.ndu.edu/ctnsp/publications.html (accessed 10 4, 2012).Google Scholar
- Aragonès, E, and P Dellunde. "An Automated Model of Government Formation." Workshop on the Political Economy of Democracy, 2008.Google Scholar
- Atkinson, M, and W Coleman. Policy networks, policy communities and the problems of governance. 1992.Google Scholar
- Atkinson, M, and W Coleman. "Strong States and Weak States: Sectoral Policy Networks in Advanced Capitalist Economies." British Journal of Political Science 14, no. 1 (1989): 46--67.Google Scholar
- Ayoob, M. "State Making, State Breaking and State Failure." In Turbulent Peace: The Challenges of Managing International Conflict, edited by C Crocker, F Hampson and P Aall. Washington, DC.: United States Institute of Peace, 2001.Google Scholar
- Banks, J, and J Duggan. "A bargaining model of collective choice." American Political Science Review 94, no. 1 (2000): 73--88.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Campbell, J. "Evaluating U.S. presidential election forecasts and forecasting equations." International Journal of Forecasting 24, no. 2 (2008): 259--271.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Campbell, J, and M Lewis-Beck. "Introduction---The 2004 presidential election forecasts." Political Science & Politics 37, no. 4 (2004): 733--736.Google Scholar
- Chhotray, V, and G Stoker. Governance Theory and Practice: A Cross Disciplinary Approach. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.Google Scholar
- Choucri, N, et al. Understanding & Modeling State Stability: Exploiting System Dynamics. working paper 4574-06, MIT Sloan School of Management, Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2006.Google Scholar
- Clarke, K, and D Primo. "Modernizing Political Science: A Model-Based Approach." Perspectives on Politics 5, no. 4 (2007): 741--754.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Crossroad. "A Participative Roadmap for ICT Research in Electronic Governance and Policy Modelling-State of the Art Analysis." the European Commission, 2010.Google Scholar
- Daniel, L. Intelligence Community Needs to Predict Uprisings. 2011. http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=62790 (accessed 10 6, 2012).Google Scholar
- Daugbjerg, C, and P Fawcett. "Governance Theory and the question of power: lesson drawing from the Governance Network and Policy Network Analysis Schools." The Australian Political Studies Association Conference. Melbourne: School of Social and Political Sciences, University of Melbourne, 2010. 27--29.Google Scholar
- Day, J. The strategy of presidential campaigns. Phd Dissertation, University of Iowa, Iowa Research Online, 2010.Google Scholar
- Diermeier, D, H Eraslan, and A Merlo. "A Structural Model of Governmment Formation." Econometrica 71, no. 1 (2003): 27--70.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dobbins, J. Beginner's Guide to Nation Building. RAND NATIONAL DEFENSE RESEARCH INSTITUTE, Santa Monicaz: Rand Corporation, 2007.Google Scholar
- eGovPoliNet. The added value brought by eGovPoliNet and Crossover. 2010. http://www.policy-community.eu/in-a-nutshell/the-added-value-brought-by-egovpolinet (accessed 10 22, 2012).Google Scholar
- European Commission. "European Governance: a White Paper." Vers. 428. European Commission. 2001. http://www.europa.eu.int/comm/governance/index_en.htm (accessed April 1, 2012).Google Scholar
- Fawcett, P, and C Daugbjerg. "Explaining Governance Outcomes: Epistemology, Network Governance and Policy Network Analysis." Political Studies Review 10, no. 2 (2012): 195--208.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Foucault, M, and R Nadeau. "Forecasting the 2012 French Presidential Election." PS Political Science and Politics 45, no. 2 (2012): 218--223.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Galeotti, M, and D Josselin. Non-State Actors in World Politics. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave, 2001.Google Scholar
- Giere, R. "Using models to represent reality." In Model-Based Reasoning in Scientific Discovery, edited by L Magnani, N Nersessian and P Thagard. New York: Kluwer Academic and Plenum Publishers, 1999.Google Scholar
- Glasgow, G, M Golder, and S Golder. "Modeling the Government Formation Process." MPSA Annual National Conference. Chicago: unpublished, 2008.Google Scholar
- Goldstone, J. "Population and Security: How Demographic Change Can Lead to Violent Conflict." Journal of International Affairs 56, no. 1 (2002): 11--12.Google Scholar
- Goldstone, J, and J Ulfelder. "How to Construct Stable Democracies." The Washington Quarterly 28, no. 1 (2004): 9--20.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Goldstone, J, et al. "A Global Model for Forecasting Political Instability." American Journal of Political Science 54, no. 1 (2010): 190--208.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Graefe, A. Issue and Leader Voting in U.S. Presidential Elections. 2012. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2110794 (accessed 10 5, 2012).Google Scholar
- Guardian. Egypt's supreme court dissolves parliament and outrages Islamists. 2012. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/jun/14/egypt-parliament-dissolved-supreme-court (accessed 10 29, 2012).Google Scholar
- Hamza, K. The Impact of Social Media and Network Governance on State Stability in Times of Turbulence: Egypt After 2011 Revolution. PhD Thesis, Institute for European Studies, Brussels: Vrije Universiteit, 2013.Google Scholar
- Hamza, K, and J Van Dalen. "E-Governance and Strategic Information Warfare -- Non Military Approach." 6th International Conference on Information Warfare & Security. Washington, DC, 2011.Google Scholar
- Johnson, P. "Simulation Modeling in Political Science." American Behavioral Scientist 42, no. 10 (1999): 1509--1530.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kingdon, J. Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1984.Google Scholar
- Kooiman, J. Governing as governanc. London: Sage, 2003.Google Scholar
- Kooiman, J. Modern governance: New government-society interactions. london: Sage, 1993.Google Scholar
- Lewis-Beck, M, and C Tien. "Forecasting presidential elections: when to change the model." International Journal of Forecasting 24, no. 2 (2008): 227--236.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lewis-Beck, M, and C Tien. "The future in forecasting: Prospective presidential models." American Politics Quarterly 24, no. 4 (1996): 468--491.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lewis-Beck, M, and T Rice. Forecasting Elections. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 1992.Google Scholar
- Linzer, D. "A Bayesian Prediction Model for the U.S. Presidential Election." American Politics Research 37 (2009): 700--724.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Macintosh, A. eParticipation in policy-making: The research and the challenges. In Exploiting the knowledge economy: Issues, applications, case studies. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2006.Google Scholar
- Marsh, D, and R Rhodes. Policy Networks in British Government. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992.Google Scholar
- Martin, L, and R Stevenson. An Empirical Model of Government Formation in Parliamentary Democracies. 2012. http://polmeth.wustl.edu/mediaDetail.php?docId=358 (accessed Oct 5, 2012).Google Scholar
- Meier, K, and L O'Toole. "Managerial Networking: Issues of Measurement and Research Design." Administration & Society 37, no. 5 (2005): 523--541.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Meier, K, and L O'Toole. "Managerial Strategies and Behavior in Networks: A Model with Evidence from U.S. Public Education." Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 11, no. 3 (2001): 271--293.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Morton, R. Methods and Models: A Guide to the Empirical Analysis of Formal Models in Political Science. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
- NBC News. Intelligence community under fire for Egypt surprise. 2011. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/41423648/ns/politics-more_politics/t/intelligence-community-under-fire-egypt-surprise/ (accessed 10 4, 2012).Google Scholar
- OECD. Concepts and Dilemmas of State Building in Fragile Situations: FROM FRAGILITY TO RESILIENCE. UN report, OECD, ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT, 2008.Google Scholar
- OECD. "OECD Policy Briefs: Engaging Citizens Online for Better Policy." http://www.oecd.org. 2004. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/62/23/2501856.pdf (accessed september 2011).Google Scholar
- OECD/DAC. "Principles for Good International Engagement in Fragile States and Situations." UN report, ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT, Paris, 2007.Google Scholar
- Oliver, P. "Formal Models of Collective Action." Annual Review of Sociology 19 (1993): 271--320.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Oliver, P, and D Myers. "Formal Models in Studying Collective Action and Social Movements." In Methods of Social Movement Research, edited by B Kiandermans and S Staggenborg. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press, 2002.Google Scholar
- Ostrom, E. Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
- Pollitt, C, and G Bouckaert. Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis. 2nd. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
- Porter, R. Knowledge utilization and the process of policy formation: Toward a framework for Africa. Washington, DC: USAID, 1995.Google Scholar
- Quinn, K, and A Martin. "An Integrated Computational Model of Multiparty Electoral Competition." Statistical Science 17, no. 4 (2002): 405--419.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rhodes, R. A. W. Governance and public administration. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
- Rhodes, R A W. "Policy network analysis." In The oxford handbook of public policy, edited by M Moran, M Rein and R Goodin, 425--447. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
- Rhodes, R A W. "The new governance: Governing without government." Political Studies 44, no. 4 (1996): 652--667.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rhodes, R A W. "Understanding Governance: Ten Years On." Organization Studies 28, no. 8 (2007): 1243--1264.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rhodes, R A W, I Bache, and S George. "Policy Network and Policy Making in the Europen Union: A Critical Appraisal." In Cohesion Policy and European Integration: Building Multi-Level Governance, edited by L Hooghe, 367--387. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
- Rhodes, R. A. W. Understanding governance: Policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability. Buckingham: Open University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
- Sabatier, P A. "Toward better theories of the policy process." Political Science and Politics 24, no. 2 (1991): 147--156.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sabatier, P A, and C M Weible. "The advocacy coalition: Innovations and clarifications." In Theories of the policy Process, edited by P Sabatier, 189--220. Boulder, CO: Westview, 2007.Google Scholar
- Sabatier, P. Theories of the policy process. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2007.Google Scholar
- Sabatier, P, and H Jenkins-Smith. Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalition approach. Boulder: Westview Press, 1993.Google Scholar
- Sabatier, P, and H Jenkins-Smith. "The Advocacy Coalition Framework: An Assessment." In Theories of the Policy Process, edited by P Sabatier, 117--166. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1999.Google Scholar
- Schlager, E. "A Comparison of Frameworks, Theories, and Models of Policy Processes." In Theories of the Policies Process, edited by P A Sabatier, 233--260. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1999.Google Scholar
- Shachtman, N. Pentagon's Prediction Software Didn't Spot Egypt Unrest. 2011. http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2011/02/pentagon-predict-egypt-unrest/ (accessed 10 6, 2012).Google Scholar
- The Economist. Egypt's constitution: An endless debate over religion's role. 2012. http://www.economist.com/node/21564249 (accessed 10 29, 2012).Google Scholar
- Tilly, C. From mobilization to revolution. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley, 1978.Google Scholar
- Tilly, C. Social Movements. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers, 2005.Google Scholar
- Tilly, C. "Social movements and (all sorts of) other political interactions -- local, national, and international -- including identities." Theory and Society (Springer Netherlands) 47, no. 4 (1998): 452--480.Google Scholar
- Toros, E. "Forecasting elections in Turkey." International Journal of Forecasting 27, no. 4 (2011): 1248--1258.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Volden, C. "A Formal Model of the Politics of Delegation in a Separation of Powers System." American Journal of Political Science 46, no. 1 (2002): 111--133.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wachhaus, T. "Anarchy as a Model for Network Governance." The American Society for Public Administration 72, no. 1 (2011): 33--42.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- State stability: a governance analysis framework for Arab spring countries
Recommendations
Social media as a tool for social movements in Arab spring countries
ICEGOV '14: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic GovernanceMany had claimed that social movements in Arab Spring countries, were sparked and organized by social media. But few who had gave a scientific explanation of the role of social media on modern social movements.
This paper address the role of social ...
A new mode of governance?: transnationalisation of European regions and cities in the information age
Special issue: The internet and local governance: issues for democracyThe call by European Union (EU) policymakers for wider and more direct involvement in improving European governance is coupled with the increased usage of new information and communications technologies (ICTs) by public administrations across the EU. ...
Israel in the Middle East the Aftermath of the Arab Spring 2010-2017: An Involved Observer from the Sidelines
This article describes how in the middle of the winter of 2010 the "Spring of the Arab Nations" suddenly erupted without any warning all over the Middle East. However, the momentum of the uprisings was impeded rather quickly, and the hopes held out for ...
Comments