skip to main content
10.1145/2691195.2691289acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicegovConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A comprehensive methodology for establishing and sustaining government chief information officer function

Published:27 October 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

The Government Chief Information Officer (GCIO) function is an international best practice for successful adoption of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) within and across government organizations, for managing the impact of ICT on government and its partners, and for maximizing the benefits produced by ICT-enabled public governance to citizens. However, many governments around the world, particularly at the local level and in developing countries, lack the capacity, tools and insight required to establish GCIO functions to fit their institutional environment and address local needs, and others had to employ a mix of top-down design, bottom-up growth and trial-and-error. To assist governments in this task, and to fill existing research-policy gap, this paper presents a comprehensive but practical methodology for establishing and sustaining the GCIO function, strongly relying on government-academia collaboration, and presents the validation of this methodology through a national GCIO development project in Colombia (GCIO.CO). The main contribution of this paper is the presentation of a policy-level tool for systematic development of GCIO functions to match local conditions, including project-level implementation framework enabled by government-academia partnership.

References

  1. Al-Taie, M. et al. 2014. The Relationship between Organisational Strategic IT Vision and CIO Roles: One size does not fit all. Australasian Journal of Information Systems. 18, 2 (2014), 59--89.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Armstrong, C. P. and Sambamurthy, V. 1999. Information Technology Assimilation in Firms: The Influence of Senior Leadership and IT Infrastructures. Information Systems Research. 10, 4 (1999), 304--327. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Auffret, J. et al. 2010. Developing a GCIO System: Enabling Good Government Through e-Leadership. Proceedings of the 11th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, Public Administration Online: Challenges and Opportunities, dg.o 2010), Puebla, Mexico (Puebla, Mexico, 2010), 292--301. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Byrd, T. A. and Turner, D. E. 2001. An Exploratory Analysis of the Value of the Skills of IT Personnel: Their relationship to IS infrastructure and competitive advantage. Decision Sciences. 32, 1 (2001), 21--47.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Cabinet Officer, U. G. 2005. Transformational Government enabled by Technology. (2005).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Cohen, J. F. and Dennis, C. M. 2010. Chief Information Officers: An empirical study of competence, organisational, positioning and implications for performance. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences. 13, 2 (2010), 203--221.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Correia, J. C. and Joia, L. A. 2014. CIO Competencies: A social representation analysis. 20th Americas Conference on Information Systems, AMCIS 2014 (Savannah, USA, 2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Dzhusupova, Z. et al. 2010. Methodology for e-Government Readiness Assessment: Models, Instruments and Implementation. Proceedings of the International Conference on Society and Information Technologies (ICSIT 2010) (Orlando, USA, 2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Dzhusupova, Z. and Janowski, T. 2009. EGOV.AF - D02.1 - Methodology for Electronic Readiness Assessment in Afghanistan - 30.05.2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. e-Government Governance: 2014. http://www.egov.gov.sg/about-egov-e-governance.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Estevez, E. et al. 2011. Establishing Government Chief Information Officer Systems -- Readiness Assessment. 11th Annual Conference on Digital Government Research (DG.O 2011) (College Park, MD, 2011), 292--301. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Estevez, E. and Janowski, T. 2014. Equipping CIOs with Strategic Infocomm Capabilities. 9th International Academy of CIO Forum (Singapore, 2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Estevez, E. and Janowski, T. 2012. Executive Master in Government Information Leadership for Sustainable Development. International CIO Congress (Moscow, Russia, 2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Estevez, E. and Janowski, T. 2013. Landscaping Government Chief Information Officer Education. 8th International IAC Annual Meeting and Forum (Beijing, China, 2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Estevez, E. and Janowski, T. 2013. Landscaping Government Chief Information Officer Education. 46 Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (Grand Wailea, Hawaii, 2013), 1684--1693. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Fan, B. and Luo, J. 2014. Benchmarking scale of e-government stage in Chinese municipalities from government chief information officers' perspective. Information Systems and e-Business Management. 12, 2 (2014), 259--284. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Gharawi, M. et al. 2014. Identifying Government Chief Information Officer Education and Training Needs -- The Case of Saudi Arabia. (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Iwasaki, N. 2009. The role of government CIO for business continuity planning in knowledge societ. ICTKE 2009 - Proceedings 2009 7th International Conference on ICT and Knowledge Engineering (Bangkok, Thailand, 2009), 128--132.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Janowski, T. et al. UNeGov. net -- Community of Practice for Electronic Governance. 402--403.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Khallaf, A. and Majdalawieh, M. 2012. Investigating the Impact of CIO Competencies on IT Security Performance of the U.S. Federal Government Agencies. Information Systems Management. 29, 1 (2012), 55--78. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Li, C. 2010. Research on Government Chief Information Officer System in China: A Critical Assessment. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (ICEGOV2010) (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Lim, J. H. et al. 2013. How CIO Position Influences Information Technology Investments and Firm Performance. International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2013): Reshaping Society Through Information Systems Design (2013), 1856--1875.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Marcovecchio, I. et al. 2013. Government Chief Information Officer (GCIO) Ontology -- A Tool to Formalize the GCIO Function. 7th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (ICEGOV2013) (Seoul, Korea, 2013). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Mokube, P. et al. 2011. Developing Electronic Governance in Cameroon (EGOV.CM) - D3: Readiness Assessment Report. Technical Report #No. 3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Ojo, A. et al. 2009. Study Report on Provincial e-Government Train-ing: Assessment, Lessons and Recommendations. EU-China Information Society Project. (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Ragowsky, A. et al. 2014. Do Not Call Me Chief Information Officer, but Chief Integration Officer. A summary of the 2011 detroit CIO roundtable. Communications of the Association for Information Systems. 34, 1 (2014), 1333--1346.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Reddick, C. G. 2008. Collaborative management and e-government: A survey of state government CIOsNo Title. Electronic Government. 5, 2 (2008), 146--161.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Sandoval-almazan, R. et al. 2010. Assessing Local E-Government: An Initial Exploration of the Case of Mexico. Proceedings of the 4t (2010), 61--65. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Stephens, C. S. et al. 1992. Executive or Functional Manager? The Nature of the CIO's Job. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems. 16, 4 (1992), 449--466. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs 2014. e-Government Survey 2014 - e-Government for the Future We Want.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. UNU-IIST, C. for E. G. at 2013. Implementing GCIO System in Colombia - Project Proposal. (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. USA Clinger Cohen Act, Public Law 104--106: 1996. http://www.dol.gov/ocfo/media/regs/ITMRA.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. USA Government 2003. e-Government Act - Public Law 107-347 107th Congress An Act. (2003), 2899--2970.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Waseda-IAC 2014. WASEDA -- IAC 10 th International E-Government Ranking 2014 Jointly Surveyed by Waseda University and. May (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A comprehensive methodology for establishing and sustaining government chief information officer function

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        ICEGOV '14: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance
        October 2014
        563 pages
        ISBN:9781605586113
        DOI:10.1145/2691195

        Copyright © 2014 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 27 October 2014

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        ICEGOV '14 Paper Acceptance Rate30of73submissions,41%Overall Acceptance Rate350of865submissions,40%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader