skip to main content
10.1145/2693787.2693793acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesesemConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Who Is Really In The Center Of Dog Computer Design?

Authors Info & Claims
Published:11 November 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

With new Animal Computer Interaction (ACI) methods and technology being created for dogs' consideration has to be given to who is in the center of the design process: the human or the dog. This paper aims to explore the problems surrounding this inquiry from the two perspectives a) the aptitude that dogs have to design technology and b) the flaws in how humans are currently designing ACI. This is discussed in a presetting of Human Computer Interaction (HCI) evolution to see whether we can transition HCI methods such as co-design and Grounded Theory Methodology (GTM) from humans to animals using their methods. Finally the philosophies behind a group Animal Computer Interaction Design (ACID) are discussed, along with a categorization of ACI technology and its relevance too who is in the center of design.

References

  1. Gray, T. (2004) A Brief History of Animals in Space. NASA Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Savage, J., et al. (2000, October). Animal-machine interfaces. In Wearable Computers, The Fourth International Symposium on .IEEE. 191--192. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Resner, B. (2001). Rover@home. Doctoral dissertation, Masters Thesis, MIT, Netherlands, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Ping, L. S et al. (2003) Cheok.Toouchy.Internet: a cybernetic system for human-pet interaction through the Internet. ACM SIGGRAPH. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Ping, L. S. et al. (2004) A human-pet interactive entertainment system over the internet, in Entertainment Computing. ICEC 2004. 509--512.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Hurley, S. L., & Nudds, M. (2006). Rational animals?.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Ping, L. S. et al (2006) A mobile pet wearable computer and mixed reality system for human-poultry interaction through the internet. Personal ubiquitous computing. 10(5), 301--317. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Silver, D. L. et al. (2008) Human Computer Dog Interface. http://iitrl.acadiau.ca/hcdi/index.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Mancini, C. et al. (2012, May). Animal-computer interaction SIG. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM annual conference extended abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts. ACM.1233--1236. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Neustaedter, C., & Golbeck, J. (2013, February). Exploring pet video chat: the remote awareness and interaction needs of families with dogs and cats. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work. ACM. 1549--1554. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Nielsen, J. (2014). 10 Heuristics for User Interface Design. http://www.nngroup.com/articles/ten-usability-heuristics/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Nielsen, J., and Molich, R. (1990). Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces, Proc. ACM CHI'90 Conf. 249--256. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Sanders, E. B and Stappers, P. J. (2013). Co- Creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign, Taylor & Francis.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Frauenberger C. et al. (2012). Challenges, Opportunities and Future Perspectives in Including Children with Disabilities in the Design of Interactive Technology. IDC 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Kjeldskov, J., & Graham, C. (2003). A review of mobile HCI research methods. In Human-computer interaction with mobile devices and services. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 317--335.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. DogTV. (2014). Television for Dogs. https://dogtv.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. ICPooch. (2014). ICPooch Interactive Care for Dogs. www.icpooch.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Laura Tallardy. (2014). App for Dog. http://lauratallardy.com/apps/app-for-dog/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Huizinga, J. (1955). Homo ludens. Boston: Beacon Press.1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Who Is Really In The Center Of Dog Computer Design?

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ACE '14 Workshops: Proceedings of the 2014 Workshops on Advances in Computer Entertainment Conference
      November 2014
      120 pages
      ISBN:9781450333146
      DOI:10.1145/2693787

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 11 November 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate36of90submissions,40%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader