ABSTRACT
With new Animal Computer Interaction (ACI) methods and technology being created for dogs' consideration has to be given to who is in the center of the design process: the human or the dog. This paper aims to explore the problems surrounding this inquiry from the two perspectives a) the aptitude that dogs have to design technology and b) the flaws in how humans are currently designing ACI. This is discussed in a presetting of Human Computer Interaction (HCI) evolution to see whether we can transition HCI methods such as co-design and Grounded Theory Methodology (GTM) from humans to animals using their methods. Finally the philosophies behind a group Animal Computer Interaction Design (ACID) are discussed, along with a categorization of ACI technology and its relevance too who is in the center of design.
- Gray, T. (2004) A Brief History of Animals in Space. NASA Publishing.Google Scholar
- Savage, J., et al. (2000, October). Animal-machine interfaces. In Wearable Computers, The Fourth International Symposium on .IEEE. 191--192. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Resner, B. (2001). Rover@home. Doctoral dissertation, Masters Thesis, MIT, Netherlands, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.Google Scholar
- Ping, L. S et al. (2003) Cheok.Toouchy.Internet: a cybernetic system for human-pet interaction through the Internet. ACM SIGGRAPH. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ping, L. S. et al. (2004) A human-pet interactive entertainment system over the internet, in Entertainment Computing. ICEC 2004. 509--512.Google Scholar
- Hurley, S. L., & Nudds, M. (2006). Rational animals?.Google Scholar
- Ping, L. S. et al (2006) A mobile pet wearable computer and mixed reality system for human-poultry interaction through the internet. Personal ubiquitous computing. 10(5), 301--317. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Silver, D. L. et al. (2008) Human Computer Dog Interface. http://iitrl.acadiau.ca/hcdi/index.html.Google Scholar
- Mancini, C. et al. (2012, May). Animal-computer interaction SIG. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM annual conference extended abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts. ACM.1233--1236. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Neustaedter, C., & Golbeck, J. (2013, February). Exploring pet video chat: the remote awareness and interaction needs of families with dogs and cats. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work. ACM. 1549--1554. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nielsen, J. (2014). 10 Heuristics for User Interface Design. http://www.nngroup.com/articles/ten-usability-heuristics/.Google Scholar
- Nielsen, J., and Molich, R. (1990). Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces, Proc. ACM CHI'90 Conf. 249--256. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sanders, E. B and Stappers, P. J. (2013). Co- Creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign, Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
- Frauenberger C. et al. (2012). Challenges, Opportunities and Future Perspectives in Including Children with Disabilities in the Design of Interactive Technology. IDC 2012. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kjeldskov, J., & Graham, C. (2003). A review of mobile HCI research methods. In Human-computer interaction with mobile devices and services. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 317--335.Google Scholar
- DogTV. (2014). Television for Dogs. https://dogtv.com/.Google Scholar
- ICPooch. (2014). ICPooch Interactive Care for Dogs. www.icpooch.com.Google Scholar
- Laura Tallardy. (2014). App for Dog. http://lauratallardy.com/apps/app-for-dog/.Google Scholar
- Huizinga, J. (1955). Homo ludens. Boston: Beacon Press.1.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Who Is Really In The Center Of Dog Computer Design?
Comments