skip to main content
10.1145/2695664.2695972acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

A domain specific language for spatial simulation scenarios (DSL3S): introduction and tool support

Published:13 April 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

Cellular automata and agent-based modelling techniques have long been used for spatial simulation in the Geographic Information Systems field. However, they largely rely on code libraries and pre-compiled models, either requiring advanced programming skills or imposing scope constraints. Several domain specific languages have been proposed in this context, but mostly resulting in new textual programming languages.

DSL3S is a domain specific language for spatial simulation, synthesising concepts in a UML profile, permitting the design of simulation models through graphical elements. MDD3S is an implementation of this language relying on model-driven development (MDD) tools built around the Eclipse IDE; it produces ready to run simulations from DSL3S models, supported by the MASON simulation tool-kit. These assets have proved sufficient to developed classic models in different GIS application fields.

References

  1. M. J. de Smith, M. F. Goodchild, and P. A. Longley. Geospatial Analysis: A Comprehensive Guide to Principles, Techniques and Software Tools - Fourth Edition, chapter Geosimulation, pages 625--672. Winchelsea Press, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. L. de Sousa and A. R. da Silva. Review of spatial simulation tools for geographic information systems. In SIMUL 2011. ThinkMind, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. L. de Sousa and A. R. da Silva. Preliminary design and implementation of dsl3s - a domain specific language for spatial simulation scenarios. In Proceedings of CAMUSS - Cellular Automata Modelling for Urban and Spatial Systems, pages 269--280. Dep. of Civil Engineering of the Univ. of Coimbra, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. P. Degenne, D. Lo Seen, D. Parigot, R. Forax, A. Tran, A. Ait Lahcen, O. Curé, and R. Jeansoulin. Design of a Domain Specific Language for modelling processes in landscapes. Ecological Modelling, 220:3527--3535, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. A. Fall and J. Fall. A domain-specific language for models of landscape dynamics. Ecological Modelling, 141:1--18, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. V. Ginot, C. Le Page, and S. Souissi. A multi-agents architecture to enhance end-user individual based modelling. Ecological Modelling, 157:23--41, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. S. Luke, C. Cioffi-Revilla, L. Panait, K. Sullivan, and G. Balan. Mason: A multi-agent simulation environment. Simulation: Transactions of the society for Modeling and Simulation International, 82(7):517--527, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. J. Merzenich and L. Frid. Projecting Landscape Conditions in Southern Utah Using VDDT. In M. Bevers and T. M. Barrett, editors, Systems Analysis in Forest Resources: Proceedings of the 2003 Symposium, pages 157--163, Portland, OR, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. D. Mladenoff. LANDIS and forest landscape models. Ecological Modelling, 180(1):7--19, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. P. Mohagheghi, W. Gilani, A. Stefanescu, M. Fernandez, B. Nordmoen, and M. Fritzsche. Where does model-driven engineering help? Experiences from three industrial cases. Software & Systems Modeling, 12(3):619--639, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. B. Müller, S. Balbi, C. M. Buchmann, L. de Sousa, G. Dressler, J. Groeneveld, C. J. Klassert, Q. B. Le, J. D. Millington, H. Nolzen, D. C. Parker, J. G. Polhill, M. Schlüter, J. Schulze, N. Schwarz, Z. Sun, P. Taillandier, and H. Weise. Standardised and transparent model descriptions for agent-based models: Current status and prospects. Environmental Modelling & Software, 55(0):156--163, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. M. J. North, T. R. Howe, N. T. Collier, and J. R. Vos. The Repast Simphony development environment. In Proceedings of the Agent 2005 Conference on Generative Social Processes, Models, and Mechanisms, Chicago, USA, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. B. Selic. The Pragmatics of Model-Driven Development. IEEE Software, 20(5):19--25, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. B. Selic. Personal reflections on automation, programming culture, and model-based software engineering. Automated Software Engineering, 15(3-4):379--391, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. A domain specific language for spatial simulation scenarios (DSL3S): introduction and tool support

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SAC '15: Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing
        April 2015
        2418 pages
        ISBN:9781450331968
        DOI:10.1145/2695664

        Copyright © 2015 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 13 April 2015

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • short-paper

        Acceptance Rates

        SAC '15 Paper Acceptance Rate291of1,211submissions,24%Overall Acceptance Rate1,650of6,669submissions,25%
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader