skip to main content
10.1145/2696454.2696472acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshriConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Interaction Expands Function: Social Shaping of the Therapeutic Robot PARO in a Nursing Home

Published:02 March 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

We use the "social shaping of technology and society" framework to qualitatively analyze data collected through observation of human-robot interaction (HRI) between social actors in a nursing home (staff, residents, visitors) and the socially assistive robot PARO. The study took place over the course of three months, during which PARO was placed in a publicly accessibly space where participants could interact with it freely. Social shaping focuses attention on social factors that affect the use and interpretation of technology in particular contexts. We therefore aimed to understand how different social actors make sense of and use PARO in daily interaction. Our results show participant gender, social mediation, and individual sense making led to differential use and interpretation of the robot, which affected the success of human-robot interactions. We also found that exposure to others interacting with PARO affected the nursing staff's perceptions of robots and their potential usefulness in eldercare. This shows that social shaping theory provides a valuable perspective for understanding the implementation of robots in long-term HRI and can inform interaction design in this domain.

References

  1. Shibata, T. and Wada, K. 2011. Robot therapy: A new approach for mental healthcare of the elderly ' A minireview. Gerontology. 57, 4, 378'386.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Kawaguchi, Y., Wada, K., Okamoto, M., Tsujii, T., Shibata, T. and Sakatani, K. 2012. Investigation of brain activity after interaction with seal robot measured by fNIRS. Proc. of ROMAN 2012, 571'576.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Wada, K., Shibata, T., Saito, T., Sakamoto, K. and Tanie, K. 2005. Psychological and social effects of one year robot assisted activity on elderly people at a health service facility for the aged. Proc. of ICRA 2005, 2785'2790.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Wada, K., Shibata, T., Saito, T. and Tanie, K. 2004. Effects of robot-assisted activity for elderly people and nurses at a day service center. Proc. of IROS 2004, 1780'1788.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Wada, K., Ikeda, Y., Inoue, K. and Uehara, R. 2010. Development and preliminary evaluation of a caregiver's manual for robot therapy using the therapeutic seal robot Paro. Proc. of RO-MAN 2010, 533'538Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Forlizzi, J. and DiSalvo, C. 2006. Service robots in the domestic environment: a study of the roomba vacuum in the home. Proc. of HRI'06, 258'265. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Mutlu, B. and Forlizzi, J. 2008. Robots in organizations: The role of workflow, social, and environmental factors in human-robot interaction. Proc. of HRI'08, 287'294. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. 'abanovi', S., Michalowski, M.P. and Simmons, R. 2006. Robots in the wild: Observing human-robot social interaction outside the lab. Proc. AMC 2006, 596'601.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Wada, K. and Shibata, T. 2007. Living with seal robots-Its sociopsychological and physiological influences on the elderly at a care house. IEEE Transactions on Robotics. 23, 5, 972'980. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. 'abanovi', S. 2010. Robots in society, society in robots: Mutual shaping of society and technology as a framework for social robot design. International Journal of Social Robotics. 2, 4, 439'450.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Bijker, W.E., Hughes, T.P., Pinch, T., and Douglas, D.G. 2012. The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology. MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Oudshoorn, N. and Pinch, T. 2003. How Users Matter: The Co-Construction of Users and Technology. MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. MacKenzie, D. and Wajcman, J. 1999. The Social Shaping of Technology. Open University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Ala', M., Movellan, J. and Tanaka, F. 2011. When a robot is social: Spatial arrangements and multimodal semiotic engagement in the practice of social robotics. Social Studies of Science. 41, 6, 893'926.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Siino, R.M. and Hinds, P.J. 2005. Robots, gender sensemaking: Sex segregation - Impact on workers making sense of a mobile autonomous robot. Proc. ICRA 2005, 2773'2778.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Vertesi, J. 2012. Seeing like a rover: Visualization, embodiment, and interaction on the Mars Exploration Rover mission. Social Studies of Science. 42, 3, 393--414.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Chang, W.-L., 'abanovi', S., and Huber, L. 2013. Situated analysis of interactions between cognitively impaired older adults and the therapeutic robot PARO. Proc. of ICSR 2013, 371'380. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Chang, W.-L., 'abanovi', S., and Huber, L. 2014. Observational study of naturalistic interactions with the socially assistive robot PARO in a nursing home. Proc. of RO-MAN 2014, 294'299.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Miles, M.B. and Huberman, A.M. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Emerson, R.M., Fretz, R.I., and Shaw, L.L. 2011. Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes. University of Chicago Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Turkle, S., Taggart, W., Kidd, C.D. and Dasté, O. 2006. Relational artifacts with children and elders: the complexities of cybercompanionship. Connection Science. 18, 4, 347--361.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Broadbent, E., Stafford, R., and MacDonald, B. 2009. Acceptance of healthcare robots for the older population: Review and future directions. International Journal of Social Robotics, 1: 319--330.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Lee, M.K., Kiesler, S., Forlizzi, J., and Rybski, P. 2012. Ripple effects of an embedded social agent: A field study of a social robot in the workplace. Proc. of CHI 2012, 695--70. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Interaction Expands Function: Social Shaping of the Therapeutic Robot PARO in a Nursing Home

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            HRI '15: Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction
            March 2015
            368 pages
            ISBN:9781450328838
            DOI:10.1145/2696454

            Copyright © 2015 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 2 March 2015

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            HRI '15 Paper Acceptance Rate43of169submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate242of1,000submissions,24%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader