skip to main content
research-article

Automated Pricing in a Multiagent Prediction Market Using a Partially Observable Stochastic Game

Published: 29 July 2015 Publication History

Abstract

Prediction markets offer an efficient market-based mechanism to aggregate large amounts of dispersed or distributed information from different people to predict the possible outcome of future events. Recently, automated prediction markets where software trading agents perform market operations such as trading and updating beliefs on behalf of humans have been proposed. A challenging aspect in automated prediction markets is to develop suitable techniques that can be used by automated trading agents to update the price at which they should trade securities related to an event so that they can increase their profit. This problem is nontrivial, as the decision to trade and the price at which trading should occur depends on several dynamic factors, such as incoming information related to the event for which the security is being traded, the belief-update mechanism and risk attitude of the trading agent, and the trading decision and trading prices of other agents. To address this problem, we have proposed a new behavior model for trading agents based on a game-theoretic framework called partially observable stochastic game with information (POSGI). We propose a correlated equilibrium (CE)-based solution strategy for this game that allows each agent to dynamically choose an action (to buy or sell or hold) in the prediction market. We have also performed extensive simulation experiments using the data obtained from the Intrade prediction market for four different prediction markets. Our results show that our POSGI model and CE strategy produces prices that are strongly correlated with the prices of the real prediction markets. Results comparing our CE strategy with five other strategies commonly used in similar market show that our CE strategy improves price predictions and provides higher utilities to the agents compared to other existing strategies.

References

[1]
R. J. Aumann. 1974. Subjectivity and correlation in randomized strategies. Journal of Mathematical Economics 1, 1, 67--96.
[2]
H. Berg and T. Proebsting. 2009. Hanson’s automated market maker Journal of Prediction Markets 3, 1, 45--59.
[3]
Betfair. 2012. Betfair Home Page. Retrieved June 29, 2015, from http://www.betfair.com/.
[4]
H. Bleichrodt, J. van Rijn, and M. Johannesson. 1999. Probability weighting and utility curvature in QALY-based decision making. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 43, 238--260.
[5]
A. Brahma, M. Chakraborty, S. Das, A. Lavoie, and M. Magdon-Ismail. 2012. A Bayesian market maker. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC’12). 215--232.
[6]
Y. Chen, S. Dimitrov, R. Sami, D. Reeves, D. Pennock, R. Hanson, L. Fortnow, and R. Gonen. 2009. Gaming prediction markets: Equilibrium strategies with a market maker. Algorithmica 58, 4, 930--969.
[7]
Y. Chen, T. Mullen, and C. Chu. 2006. An in-depth analysis of information markets with aggregate uncertainty. Electronic Commerce Research 6, 2, 201--222.
[8]
Y. Chen and D. Pennock. 2007. Utility framework for bounded-loss market maker. In Proceedings of the 23rd Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI’07). 49--56.
[9]
D. Cliff. 1997. Minimal-Intelligence Agents for Bargaining Behaviours in Market-Based Environments. Technical Report HPL-97-91. HP Labs.
[10]
B. Cowgill, J. Wolfers, and E. Zitzewitz. 2008. Using Prediction Markets to Track Information Flows: Evidence from Google. Technical Report. Dartmouth College. Available at http://www.columbia.edu/∼bc2656/GooglePredictionMarketPaper.pdf.
[11]
A. P. Dempster, N. M. Laird, and D. B. Rubin. 1977. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B 39, 1, 1--38.
[12]
S. Dimitrov and R. Sami. 2008. Nonmyopic strategies in prediction markets. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC’08). 200--209.
[13]
S. Dimitrov and R. Sami. 2010. Composition of markets with conflicting incentives. In Proceedings of the 11th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC’10). 53--62.
[14]
S. Dimitrov, R. Sami, and M. Epelman. 2009. Subsidized prediction markets for risk averse traders. In Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Internet and Network Economics (WINE’09). 491--497.
[15]
J. Feigenbaum, L. Fortnow, D. Pennock, and R. Sami. 2005. Computation in a distributed information market. Theoretical Computer Science 343, 1--2, 114--132.
[16]
D. Fudenberg and J. Tirole. 1991. Game Theory. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
[17]
S. Gjerstad. 2005. Risks, Aversions and Beliefs in Predictions Markets. Mimeo, University of Arizona.
[18]
J. Goeree, C. Holt, and T. Palfrey. 2003. Risk averse behavior in generalized matching pennies games. Games and Economic Behavior 45, 1, 97--113.
[19]
T. Gruca, J. Berg, and M. Cipriano. 2008. Incentive and accuracy issues in movie prediction markets. Journal of Prediction Markets 2, 1, 29--43.
[20]
M. Hall, E. Frank, G. Holmes, B. Pfahringer, P. Reutemann, and I. Witten. 2009. The WEKA data mining software: An update. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter 11, 1, 10--18.
[21]
E. Hansen, D. Bernstein, and S. Zilberstein. 2004. Dynamic programming for partially observable stochastic games. In Proceedings of the 19th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 709--715.
[22]
R. Hanson. 2003. Combinatorial information market design. Information Systems Frontiers 5, 1, 105--119.
[23]
R. Hanson. 2007. Logarithmic market scoring rules for modular combinatorial information aggregation. Journal of Prediction Markets 1, 1, 3--15.
[24]
C. A. Holt and S. K. Laury. 2002. Risk aversion and incentive effects. American Economic Review 92, 1644--1655.
[25]
Hollywood Stock Exchange. 2012. Hollywood Stock Exchange Home Page. Retrieved June 29, 2015, from http://www.hsx.com/.
[26]
Intrade. 2012. Intrade Home Page. Retrieved June 29, 2015, from https://prev.intrade.com/v4/home/.
[27]
K. Iyer, R. Johari, and C. Moallemi. 2010. Information aggregation in smooth markets. In Proceedings of the 11th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC’10). 199--206.
[28]
J. Jumadinova and P. Dasgupta. 2011a. A multi-agent prediction market based on partially observable stochastic game. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Electronic Commerce (ICEC’11). 21:1--21:10.
[29]
J. Jumadinova and P. Dasgupta. 2011b. A multi-agent system for analyzing the effect of information on prediction markets. International Journal of Intelligent Systems 26, 1, 383--409.
[30]
J. Jumadinova and P. Dasgupta. 2011c. Partially observable stochastic game-based multi-agent prediction markets. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS’11). 1217--1218.
[31]
J. B. Kadane and R. L. Winkler. 1988. Separating probability elicitation from utilities. Journal of the American Statistical Association 83, 402, 357--363.
[32]
M. Littman. 1994. Markov games as a framework for multi-agent reinforcement learning. In Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-13), Vol. 94. 157--163.
[33]
R. D. Luce and C. L. Krumhansi. 1988. Measurement, scaling, and psychophysics. In Stevens Handbook of Experimental Psychology, H. Pashler and S. Yantis (Eds.). Wiley, New York, NY, 3--74.
[34]
H. Ma and H. Leung. 2008. Bidding Strategies in Agent-Based Continuous Double Auctions. Whitestein Series in Software Agent Technologies and Autonomic Computing.
[35]
C. Manski. 2006. Interpreting the predictions of prediction markets. Economic Letters 91, 3, 425--429.
[36]
Google News. 2012. Google News. Retrieved June 29, 2015, from http://news.google.com.
[37]
M. Ostrovsky. 2009. Information aggregation in dynamic markets with strategic traders. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC’09). 253--254.
[38]
A. Othman. 2008. Zero intelligence agents in prediction markets. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. 879--886.
[39]
A. Othman and T. Sandholm. 2010a. Automated market-making in the large: The Gates Hillman prediction market. In Proceedings of the 11th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC’10). 367--376.
[40]
A. Othman and T. Sandholm. 2010b. When do markets with simple agents fail? In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems: Volume 1 (AAMAS’10). 865--872.
[41]
A. Othman, T. Sandholm, D. Pennock, and D. Reeves. 2010. A practical liquidity-sensitive automated market maker. In Proceedings of the 11th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC’10). 377--386.
[42]
C. Papadimitriou and T. Roughgarden. 2008. Computing correlated equilibria in multi-player games. Journal of ACM 1, 29, 14:1--14:29.
[43]
C. Papadimitriou and T. Roughgarden. 2012. Comments on “Computing Correlated Equilibria in Multi-Player Games.” Retrieved June 29, 2015, from http://theory.stanford.edu/∼tim/papers/comment.pdf.
[44]
D. Pennock and R. Sami. 2007. Computational aspects of prediction markets. In Algorithmic Game Theory, N. Nisan, T. Roughgarden, E. Tardos, and V. Vazirani (Eds.). Cambridge University Press, 651--671.
[45]
C. Plott and K. Chen. 2002. Information Aggregation Mechanisms: Concept, Design and Implementation for a Sales Forecasting Problem. Technical Report. Social Science working paper no. 1131, California Institute of Technology.
[46]
J. Surowiecki. 2005. The Wisdom of Crowds. Anchor Books, New York, NY.
[47]
A. Szolnoki, Z. Wang, and M. Perc. 2012. Wisdom of groups promotes cooperation in evolutionary social dilemmas. Scientific Reports 2, 576.
[48]
M. Thelwall, K. Buckley, G. Paltoglou, D. Cai, and A. Kappas. 2010. Sentiment strength detection in short informal text. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 61, 12, 2544--2558.
[49]
P. P. Wakker. 2008. Explaining the characteristics of the power (CRRA) utility family. Health Economics 17, 1329--1344.
[50]
X. Wang, M. Perc, Y. Liu, X. Chen, and L. Wang. 2012. Beyond pairwise strategy updating in the prisoner’s dilemma game. Scientific Reports 2, 740.
[51]
J. Wolfers and E. Zitzewitz. 2004. Prediction markets. Journal of Economic Perspectives 18, 2, 107--126.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Automated Pricing in a Multiagent Prediction Market Using a Partially Observable Stochastic Game

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology
    ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology  Volume 6, Issue 4
    Regular Papers and Special Section on Intelligent Healthcare Informatics
    August 2015
    419 pages
    ISSN:2157-6904
    EISSN:2157-6912
    DOI:10.1145/2801030
    • Editor:
    • Yu Zheng
    Issue’s Table of Contents
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 29 July 2015
    Accepted: 01 December 2014
    Revised: 01 September 2014
    Received: 01 July 2013
    Published in TIST Volume 6, Issue 4

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Prediction market
    2. correlated equilibrium
    3. risk-averse traders
    4. stochastic game

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed

    Funding Sources

    • Office of Naval Research

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 08 Mar 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all

    View Options

    Login options

    Full Access

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media