skip to main content
10.1145/2700648.2809858acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesassetsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Best Student Paper

Social Media Platforms for Low-Income Blind People in India

Published:26 October 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present the first analysis of the use and non-use of social media platforms by low-income blind users in rural and peri-urban India. Using a mixed-methods approach of semi-structured interviews and observations, we examine the benefits received by low-income blind people from Facebook, Twitter and WhatsApp and investigate constraints that impede their social media participation. We also present a detailed analysis of how low-income blind people used a voice-based social media platform deployed in India that received significant traction from low-income people in rural and peri-urban areas. In eleven-weeks of deployment, fifty-three blind participants in our sample collectively placed 4784 voice calls, contributed 1312 voice messages, cast 33,909 votes and listened to the messages 46,090 times. Using a mixed-methods analysis of call logs, qualitative interviews, and phone surveys, we evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the platform and benefits it offered to low-income blind people.

References

  1. Sheetal K Agarwal, Arun Kumar, Amit Anil Nanavati, and Nitendra Rajput. 2010. User-Generated Content Creation and Dissemination in Rural Areas. Information Technologies and International Development 6, 2, 21--37.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Tanja Bosch. 2011. Young women and "technologies of the self": Social networking and sexualities. Agenda 25, 4, 75--86. http://doi.org/10.1080/10130950.2011.630579Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Tanja E. Bosch. 2009. Using online social networking for teaching and learning: Facebook use at the University of Cape Town. Communication 35, 2, 185--200. http://doi.org/10.1080/02500160903250648Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Erin L. Brady, Yu Zhong, Meredith Ringel Morris, and Jeffrey P. Bigham. 2013. Investigating the Appropriateness of Social Network Question Asking As a Resource for Blind Users. Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, ACM, 1225--1236. http://doi.org/10.1145/2441776.2441915 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Moira Burke, Robert Kraut, and Diane Williams. 2010. Social Use of Computer-mediated Communication by Adults on the Autism Spectrum. Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, ACM, 425--434. http://doi.org/10.1145/1718918.1718991 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Nicole B. Ellison, Charles Steinfield, and Cliff Lampe. 2011. Connection Strategies: Social Capital Implications of Facebook-enabled Communication Practices. New Media & Society, 1461444810385389. http://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810385389Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Kristin Skeide Fuglerud, Ingvar Tjøstheim, Birkir Rúnar Gunnarsson, and Morten Tollefsen. 2012. Use of Social Media by People with Visual Impairments: Usage Levels, Attitudes and Barriers. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Computers Helping People with Special Needs - Volume Part I, Springer-Verlag, 565--572. http://doi.org/10.1007/978--3--642--31522-0_85 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. AS Grover and K Calteaux. 2012. A voice service for user feedback on school meals. ACM DEV. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm--id=2160619 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Mohamed Gulaid and Aditya Vashistha. 2013. Ila Dhageyso : An Interactive Voice Forum to Foster Transparent Governance in Somaliland. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Information and Communications Technologies and Development, 13--16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Zahir Koradia, Piyush Aggarwal, Aaditeshwar Seth, and Gaurav Luthra. 2013. Gurgaon Idol: A Singing Competition over Community Radio and IVRS. Proceedings of the 3rd ACM Symposium on Computing for Development, ACM, 6:1--6:10. http://doi.org/10.1145/2442882.2442890 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Cliff Lampe, Donghee Yvette Wohn, Jessica Vitak, Nicole B. Ellison, and Rick Wash. 2011. Student use of Facebook for organizing collaborative classroom activities. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 6, 3, 329--347. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-011--9115-yGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Maarit Mäkinen and Mary Wangu Kuira. 2008. Social Media and Post-election Crisis in Kenya. The International Journal of Press/Politics 13, 3, 328--335. http://doi.org/10.1177/1940161208319409Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Ted McCarthy, Joyojeet Pal, Tanvi Marballi, and Edward Cutrell. 2012. An Analysis of Screen Reader Use in India. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development, ACM, 149--158. http://doi.org/10.1145/2160673.2160694 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Indrani Medhi-Thies, Pedro Ferreira, Nakull Gupta, Jacki O'Neill, and Edward Cutrell. 2015. KrishiPustak: A Social Networking System for Low-Literate Farmers. Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, ACM, 1670--1681. http://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675224 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Preeti Mudliar, Jonathan Donner, and William Thies. 2012. Emergent Practices Around CGNet Swara, Voice Forum for Citizen Journalism in Rural India. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development, ACM, 159--168. http://doi.org/10.1145/2160673.2160695 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. David Nemer. 2015. Online Favela: The Use of Social Media by the Marginalized in Brazil. Information Technology for Development 0, 0, 1--16. http://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2015.1011598Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Joyojeet Pal. 2015. Banalities Turned Viral Narendra Modi and the Political Tweet. Television & New Media 16, 4, 378--387. http://doi.org/10.1177/1527476415573956Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Joyojeet Pal, Yeswanth Gogineni, Kunjan Sanghavi, et al. 2012. Local-language Digital Information in India: Challenges and Opportunities for Screen Readers. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development, ACM, 318--325. http://doi.org/10.1145/2160673.2160712 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Joyojeet Pal and Meera Lakshmanan. 2012. Assistive Technology and the Employment of People with Vision Impairments in India. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development, ACM, 307--317. http://doi.org/10.1145/2160673.2160711 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Joyojeet Pal, Manas Pradhan, Mihir Shah, and Rakesh Babu. 2011. Assistive Technology for Vision-impairments: An agenda for the ICTD Community. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web, ACM, 513--522. http://doi.org/10.1145/1963192.1963365 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. D. Pascolini and S. P. Mariotti. 2012. Global estimates of visual impairment: 2010. British Journal of Ophthalmology 96, 5, 614--618. http://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2011--300539Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Neil Patel, Deepti Chittamuru, Anupam Jain, Paresh Dave, and Tapan S. Parikh. 2010. Avaaj Otalo: A Field Study of an Interactive Voice Forum for Small Farmers in Rural India. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 733--742. http://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753434 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Jennifer Pearson, Simon Robinson, Matt Jones, Amit Nanavati, and Nitendra Rajput. 2013. ACQR: Acoustic Quick Response Codes for Content Sharing on Low End Phones with No Internet Connectivity. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Human-computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, ACM, 308--317. http://doi.org/10.1145/2493190.2493195 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Nimmi Rangaswamy and Edward Cutrell. 2013. Local Pocket Internet and Global Social Media: Facebook and Youth Sub-Stratum in Urban India. IFIP 9th International Conference on Social Implications of Computers in Developing Countries.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Agha Ali Raza, Farhan Ul Haq, Zain Tariq, et al. 2013. Job Opportunities Through Entertainment: Virally Spread Speech-based Services for Low-literate Users. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 2803--2812. http://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2481389 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Clay Shirky. 2011. The Political Power of Social Media: Technology, the Public Sphere, and Political Change. Foreign Affairs 90, 1, 28--41.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Brian Solis. The Social Revolution is Our Industrial Revolution. Retrieved from http://www.briansolis.com/2008/07/social-revolution-is-our-industrial/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Kate Starbird and Leysia Palen. 2011. "Voluntweeters": Self-organizing by Digital Volunteers in Times of Crisis. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 1071--1080. http://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979102 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Kate Starbird and Leysia Palen. 2012. (How) Will the Revolution Be Retweeted--: Information Diffusion and the 2011 Egyptian Uprising. Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, ACM, 7--16. http://doi.org/10.1145/2145204.2145212 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Michael A. Stefanone, Kyounghee Hazel Kwon, and Derek Lackaff. 2012. Exploring the relationship between perceptions of social capital and enacted support online. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 17, 4, 451--466. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083--6101.2012.01585.x Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Theodore Tsaousides, Yuka Matsuzawa, and Matthew Lebowitz. 2011. Familiarity and prevalence of Facebook use for social networking among individuals with traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 25, 12, 1155--1162. http://doi.org/10.3109/02699052.2011.613086Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Aditya Vashistha, Erin Brady, William Thies, and Edward Cutrell. 2014. Educational Content Creation and Sharing by Low-Income Visually Impaired People in India. Proceedings of the Fifth ACM Symposium on Computing for Development, ACM, 63--72. http://doi.org/10.1145/2674377.2674385 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Aditya Vashistha, Edward Cutrell, Gaetano Borriello, and William Thies. 2015. Sangeet Swara: A Community-Moderated Voice Forum in Rural India. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 417--426. http://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702191 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Aditya Vashistha and William Thies. IVR Junction: Building Scalable and Distributed Voice Forums in the Developing World.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Aditya Vashistha and William Thies. IVR Junction. Retrieved from www.ivrjunction.orgGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Brian Wentz and Jonathan Lazar. 2011. Are Separate Interfaces Inherently Unequal--: An Evaluation with Blind Users of the Usability of Two Interfaces for a Social Networking Platform. Proceedings of the 2011 iConference, ACM, 91--97. http://doi.org/10.1145/1940761.1940774 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. WHO. 2013. Factsheet on Visual impairment and blindness. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs282/en/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Derek Willis. 2014. Narendra Modi, the Social Media Politician. The New York Times. Retrieved May 5, 2015 from http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/26/upshot/narendra-modi-the-social-media-politician.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Shaomei Wu and Lada A. Adamic. 2014. Visually Impaired Users on an Online Social Network. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 3133--3142. http://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557415 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Susan P. Wyche, Andrea Forte, and Sarita Yardi Schoenebeck. 2013. Hustling Online: Understanding Consolidated Facebook Use in an Informal Settlement in Nairobi. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 2823--2832. http://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2481391 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Susan P. Wyche, Sarita Yardi Schoenebeck, and Andrea Forte. 2013. "Facebook is a Luxury": An Exploratory Study of Social Media Use in Rural Kenya. Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, ACM, 33--44. http://doi.org/10.1145/2441776.2441783 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Social Media: The Biggest Shift Since The Industrial Revolution. Social Factor. Retrieved May 5, 2015 from http://socialfactor.com/social-media-the-biggest-shift-since-the-industrial-revolution/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. BBC Nepali earthquake lifeline public chat channel launches on Viber. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.co.uk/mediacentre/latestnews/2015/bbc-nepali-viber-launchGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. GDP per capita (current US$) | Data | Table. The World Bank. Retrieved from http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CDGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Voxeo Prophecy Platform. Retrieved from http://voxeo.com/prophecy/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Social Media Platforms for Low-Income Blind People in India

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      ASSETS '15: Proceedings of the 17th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers & Accessibility
      October 2015
      466 pages
      ISBN:9781450334006
      DOI:10.1145/2700648

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 26 October 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      ASSETS '15 Paper Acceptance Rate30of127submissions,24%Overall Acceptance Rate436of1,556submissions,28%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader