Christina Masden
ABSTRACT
Online dating sites have become a common means of finding a romantic partner. And yet, these sites differ greatly from many other socially oriented websites: perhaps most notably, the pairwise style of interaction afforded by these sites prevents a robust online community from forming. Users, however, have taken matters into their own hands by creating thriving external forums for discussion of specific dating sites. We report on a multiple methods study of two online dating services, via observation and interviews with users of the forums associated with these sites. Our findings suggest that these forums play an essential role in creating an "outsourced community" for the dating sites, and also reveal practices around how some users "game the system" in online dating, the prevalence of harassment in online dating, and users' frustrations with current dating sites. We conclude with a number of recommendations for system design.
Supplemental Material
- Best of Tinder -- /r/Tinder. 14 Sept 2014. https://reddit.com/r/tinder.Google Scholar
- Georgia Institute of Technology. 22 Sept 2014. http://www.news.gatech.edu/2014/02/17/couplet-love-story.Google Scholar
- OkCupid on Reddit -- /r/OkCupid. 14. Sept 2014. Available from: https://reddit.com/r/okcupid.Google Scholar
- Terms | OkCupid. 12. Sept 2014. http://www.okcupid.com/legal/terms.Google Scholar
- The Tinder-O-Matic. Sink Hacks. 22 Sept 2014. http://sinkhacks.com/tinder-o-matic/.Google Scholar
- Usenet Personals: Advice for Straights FAQ (1/3. 14 Sept 2014. http://www.faqs.org/faqs/personals/straightfaq/part1Google Scholar
- Bardzell, S. and J. Bardzell. Towards a Feminist HCI Methodology: Social science, Feminism, and HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 201 ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bernard, H.H.R. et. al, Analyzing Qualitative Data: Systematic Approaches. 2009: SAGE publications.Google Scholar
- Biel, J. and D. Gatica-Perez, The Youtube Lens: Crowdsourced Personality Impressions and Audiovisual Analysis of Vlogs. Multimedia, IEEE Transactions on, 2013. 15(1): p. 41--55. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bruckman, A., et al. Managing Deviant Behavior in Online Communities. In CHI'06 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2006. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bryant, S.L. et al. Becoming Wikipedian: Transformation of Participation in a Collaborative Online Encyclopedia. In Proceedings of the 2005 international ACM SIGGROUP conference on Supporting group work. 2005. ACM Google ScholarDigital Library
- Collins, S.A., C. Missing, Vocal and Visual Attractiveness are Related in Women. Animal behaviour, 2003. 65(5): p. 997--1004.Google Scholar
- DeSanctis, G., et al., Learning in Online Forums. European Management Journal, 2003. 21(5): p. 565--577.Google Scholar
- Dimond, J.P., et al. Hollaback!: The Role of Storytelling Online in a Social Movement Organization. CSCW 2013. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ellison, N.B., Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2007. 13(1): p. 210--230.Google Scholar
- Finkel, E.J., et al., Online Dating A Critical Analysis From the Perspective of Psychological Science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2012. 13(1): p. 3--66.Google Scholar
- Fiore, A.T. et al., Online Personals: An Overview. In CHI'04 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2004. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fiore, A.T. , J.S. Donath. Homophily in Online Dating: When Do You Like Someone Like Yourself? In CHI'05 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2005. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fiore, A.T., et al. Assessing Attractiveness in Online Dating Profiles. CHI 2008. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Frost, J.H., et al., People are Experience Goods: Improving Online Dating with Virtual Dates. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 2008. 22(1): p. 51--61.Google Scholar
- Goffman, E., The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. 1959.Google Scholar
- Golbeck, J., C. Robles, and K. Turner. Predicting Personality with Social Media. In CHI'11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2011. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hall, J.A., et al., Strategic misrepresentation in online dating: The effects of gender, self-monitoring, and personality traits. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2010. 27(1): p. 117--135.Google Scholar
- Hancock, J.T., C. Toma, and N. Ellison. The Truth About Lying in Online Dating Profiles. CHI 2007. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hancock, J.T. and C.L. Toma, Putting Your Best Face Forward: The Accuracy of Online Dating Photographs. Journal of Communication, 2009. 59(2): p. 367--386.Google Scholar
- Hitsch, G.J. et al. What Makes You Click-Mate Preferences in Online Dating. Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 2010. 8(4): p. 393--427.Google Scholar
- Irani, L.C. and M. Silberman. Turkopticon: Interrupting Worker Invisibility in Amazon Mechanical Turk. CHI 2013. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jones, Q., Virtual-Communities, Virtual Settlements & Cyber-Archaeology: A Theoretical Outline. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 1997. 3(3).Google Scholar
- Kosinski, M., D. Stillwell, and T. Graepel, Private traits and attributes are predictable from digital records of human behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2013. 110(15): p. 5802--5805.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lampe, C. and E. Johnston. Follow the (Slash) dot: Effects of Feedback on New Members in an Online Community. SIGGROUP 2005. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lauterbach, D., et al. Surfing a Web of Trust: Reputation and Reciprocity on Couchsurfing.com. CSE'09. IEEE. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lave, J. and E. Wenger, Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. 1991: Cambridge university press.Google Scholar
- Lee, A.Y. and A.S. Bruckman. Judging You by the Company You Keep: Dating on Social Networking Sites. CSCW 2007. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Masden, C.A., et al. Tensions in Scaling-up Community Social Media: A Multi-Neighborhood Study of Nextdoor. CHI 2014. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Oldenburg, R., The Great Good Place: Cafes, Coffee Shops, Bookstores, Bars, Hair Salons, and Other Hangouts at the Heart of a Community. 1999: Marlowe New York.Google Scholar
- PRWeb. Dating Services in the US Industry Market Research Report from IBISWorld Has Been Updated. 2013 16 Mar. 2013; Available from: http://www.prweb.com/releases/2013/3/prweb10537905.htm.Google Scholar
- Putnam, R.D., The Strange Disappearance of Civic America. American Prospect, 1996: p. 34--49.Google Scholar
- Rosen, L.D., et al., The Impact of Emotionality and Self-Disclosure on Online Dating Versus Traditional Dating. Computers in Human Behavior, 2008. 24(5): p. 2124--2154. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rudder, C., Dataclysm: Who We Are (When We Think No One's Looking). 2014: Random House LLC. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Skopek, J. et al. Who Contacts Whom? Educational Homophily in Online Mate Selection. European Sociological Review, 2010: p. jcp068Google Scholar
- Smith, A., M. Duggan. Online Dating & Relationships. Pew Internet & American Life Project, 2013.Google Scholar
- Toma, C.L. et al., Separating Fact From Fiction: An Examination of Deceptive Self-Presentation in Online Dating Profiles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2008. 34(8): p. 1023--1036Google Scholar
- Yee, N., et al. Introverted Elves & Conscientious Gnomes: The Expression of Personality in World of Warcraft. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2011. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Zytko, D. et al., Impression Management Through Communication in Online Dating. In Proceedings of the Companion Publication of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 2014. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Understanding the Role of Community in Online Dating
Recommendations
Impression Management Struggles in Online Dating
GROUP '14: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group WorkOnline dating systems are now widely used to search for romance and yet there is little research on how people use these systems to manage their impressions with potential romantic partners. To address this issue we conducted an interview study of 41 ...
Understanding active participation of online dating services: A mixed methods study
AbstractOnline dating has transformed the way people meet and start relationships. However, online dating platforms typically have many lurkers without active participation. Using a self-regulation framework, this paper aims to study users' ...
Highlights- Mixed methods study was used to understand user active participation in online dating.
The attractiveness, trustworthiness and desirability of autistic males’ online dating profiles
AbstractA lack of success through traditional, face-to-face dating has led some autistic adults to pursue relationships through online dating. Creating an online dating profile, however, is a process that requires a range of complex social ...
Highlights- Two studies of autistic males’ online dating profiles led us to develop 3 key tips for autistic online daters.
Comments