skip to main content
10.1145/2702123.2702441acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Power, Empowerment and Open Source Usability

Published:18 April 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

Open source software (OSS) projects are often seen as participatory and egalitarian settings where people collaboratively develop software to serve their needs as well as the needs of others. In this paper, however, we argue that power and politics also characterize OSS development, and that this has serious implications for OSS usability. The existing Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) research on OSS usability has already shown that power and politics play a role; this study offers a theoretical treatment of the matter. A theoretical framework on power and empowerment is utilized in analyzing empirical data on OSS usability as well as the existing body of knowledge on the topic. With the help of this framework, HCI research can address the aspects of power and empowerment in OSS usability in a more systematic and comprehensive manner.

References

  1. Aberdour, M. Achieving Quality in Open Source Software. IEEE Software, 24, 1 (2007), 58--64. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Andreasen, M., Nielsen, H., Schrøder, S. and Stage, J. Usability in Open Source Software Development: Opinions and Practice. Information Technology and Control 25, 3A (2006), 303--312.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Aucella, A. Ensuring Success with Usability Engineering. Interactions May + June (1997), 19--22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Bach, P. M and Carroll, J. M. Characterizing the Dynamics of Open User Experience Design: The Cases of Firefox and OpenOffice.org. JAIS 11, 12 (2010).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Bach, P., DeLine, R. and Carroll, J. Designers Wanted: Participation and the User Experience in Open Source Software Development. Proc. CHI 2009 (2009). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Bach, P. and Twidale, M. Social participation in open source: what it means for designers. Interactions 17, 3 (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Beck, E. P for Political. Participation is not enough. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 14, 1 (2002), 77--92.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Benson, C., Müller-Prove, M. and Mzourek, J. Professional usability in open source projects: GNOME, OpenOffice.org, NetBeans. Ext. Ab. CHI2004 (2004). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Butler, T. and Fitzgerald, B. A Case Study of User Participation in the Information Systems Development Process, Proc. ICIS (1997), 411--426. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Bødker, S., Nielsen, L. and Orngreen, R. Enabling usercentered design processes in open source communities. In Proc. HCII, Part I, LNCS 4559 (2007), 10--18. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Di Tullio, D. and Staples, D.S. The Governance and Control of Open Source Software Projects. Journal of Management Information Systems 30, 3 (2013), 49--80.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Feller, J. and Fitzgerald, B. A Framework Analysis of the Open Source Development Paradigm. Proc. ICIS 2000 (2000), 58--69. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Fitzgerald, B. The Transformation of Open Source Software. MISQ 30, 3 (2006), 481--493. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Gallivan, M. J. Striking a balance between trust and control in a virtual organization: a content analysis of open source software case studies. Information Systems Journal 11, 4 (2001), 277--304.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Gulliksen, J., Boivie, I., and Göransson, B. Usability professionals -- current practices and future development. Interacting with Computers 18, 4 (2006). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Hardy, C. and Leiba-O'Sullivan, S. The power behind empowerment: Implications for research and practice. Human Relations 51, 4 (1998), 451--483.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Himanen, P. The hacker ethic and the spirit of the information age. WSOY Helsinki (2001). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Hevner, A.R., March, S.T. and Park, J. Design research in information systems research. MIS Quarterly 28, 1 (2004), 75--105. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Howcroft, D. and Wilson, M. Paradoxes of participatory practices: the Janus role of the systems developer. Information and Organization 13, 1 (2003), 1--24.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Iivari, N. Discourses on "culture" and "usability work" in software product development. Acta Universitatis Ouluensis, Series A, Scientiae rerum nat. 457, (2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Ikonen, H., Iivari, N. and Hedberg, H. Controlling the use of collaboration tools in open source software development. Proc. NordiHCI (2010), 236--245 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Krishnamurthy, S. Cave or community?: An empirical examination of 100 mature open source projects. First Monday (2002).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. de Laat, P. Governance of open source software: state of the art. Journal of Management & Governance 11, 2 (2007), 165--177.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Ljungberg, J. Open Source Movements as a Model for Organizing. European Journal of Information Systems 9, 4 (2000), 208--216. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. March, ST., and Smith, G.F. Design and natural science research on information technology. Decision support systems 15, 4 (1995), 251--266 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Mayhew, D. Strategic Development of Usability Engineering Function. Interactions 6, 5 (1999) Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Mockus, A., Fielding, R.T. and Herbsled, J. A Case Study of Open Source Software Development: The Apache Server. Proc. ICSE (2000), 263--272. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Moghaddam, R., Twidale, M. and Bongen, K. Open source interface politics: identity, acceptance, trust, and lobbying. Extended Abstracts of the CHI2011 (2011)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Nichols, D. and Twidale, M. The Usability of Open Source Software. First Monday 8, 1, (2003).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Rajanen, M. Different approaches to Usability Cost-Benefit Analysis. Proc. ECITE 2006 (2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Rajanen, M. Applying Usability Cost-Benefit Analysis -- Explorations in Commercial and Open Source Software Development Contexts. Acta Universitatis Ouluensis, Ser. A, Scient. rerum nat. 587 (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Rajanen, M., Iivari, N. and Anttila K. Introducing Usability Activities into Open Source Software Development Projects -- Searching for a Suitable Approach. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application 12, 4 (2011), 5--26.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Rajanen, M., Iivari, N. and Keskitalo, E. Introducing usability activities into open source software development projects: a participative approach. Proc. NordiCHI 2012 (2012), 683--692. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Raymond, E. The Cathedral & the Bazaar: Musing on Linux and Open Source by an Accidental Revolutionary. O'Reilly & Assoc. (1999). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Robbins, J. Adopting open source software engineering (OSSE) practices by adopting OSSE Tools. In Feller et al. (2005), 245--264.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Rolandsson, B., Bergquist, M. and Ljungberg, J. Open source programmer's strategies to cope with ideological tensions. Proc. OLKC 2009 (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Rosenbaum, S., Rohn, J., Humburg, J. A Toolkit for Strategic Usability: Results from Workshops, Panels, and Surveys. Proc. CHI. 2000 (2000), 337--344. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Terry, M., Kay, M. and Lafreniere, B. Perceptions and Practices of Usability in the Free/Open Source Software (FOSS) Community. Proc. CHI 2010 (2010), 999--1008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. von Hippel, E. Innovation by User Communities: Learning from Open-Source Software. MIT Sloan Management Review 42, 4 (2001), 82--86.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. von Hippel, E. and Krogh, G. Open source software and the "private-collective" innovation model: Issues for organization science. Organization science, 14,2 (2003), 209--223. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Von Krogh, G., Spaeth, S., & Lakhani, K. R. Community, joining, and specialization in open source software innovation: a case study. Research Policy, 32,7 (2003), 1217--1241.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Power, Empowerment and Open Source Usability

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '15: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2015
      4290 pages
      ISBN:9781450331456
      DOI:10.1145/2702123

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 18 April 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '15 Paper Acceptance Rate486of2,120submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader