skip to main content
10.1145/2702123.2702468acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Cooperative Game Play with Avatars and Agents: Differences in Brain Activity and the Experience of Play

Authors Info & Claims
Published:18 April 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

The current study sought to identify the impact of whether teammates in a cooperative videogame were controlled by other humans (avatars) or by the game (agents). The impact on player experience was explored through both subjective questionnaire measures and brain wave activity measurement (electroencephalography). Play with human teammates was associated with a greater sense of relatedness, but less competence and flow than play with other computer-controlled teammates. In terms of brain activity, play with human teammates was associated with greater activity in the alpha, theta and beta power bands than play with computer-controlled teammates. Overall, the results suggest that play with human teammates involves greater cognitive activity in terms of 'mentalising' than play with computer-controlled teammates. Additionally, the associations between subjective measures of player experience and brain activity are described. Limitations of the current study are identified and key directions for future research are discussed.

References

  1. Cairns, P., et al., Who but not where: The effect of social play on immersion in digital games. IJHCS 71, 11 (2013), 1069--1077. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Cole, H. and W.J. Ray, EEG correlates of emotional tasks related to attentional demands. International Journal of Psychophysiology 3, 1 (1985), 33--41.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Cooper, N.R., et al., Paradox lost? Exploring the role of alpha oscillations during externally vs. internally directed attention and the implications for idling and inhibition hypotheses. J. Psy-phys 47, 1 (2003), 65--74.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Drachen, A., et al. Correlation between heart rate, electrodermal activity and player experience in firstperson shooter games. ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Video Games 2010, ACM (2010), 49--54. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Fisch, B.J. and R. Spehlmann, Fisch and Spehlmann's EEG primer: basic principles of digital and analog EEG. (1999), Amsterdam: Elsevier Health Sciences.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Gajadhar, B., Y. De Kort, and W. Ijsselsteijn, Shared fun is doubled fun: Player enjoyment as a function of social setting, in Fun and Games. (2008): Eindhoven, Netherlands. p. 106--117. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Gallagher, H.L., et al., Imaging the intentional stance in a competitive game. Neuroimage 16, 3 (2002), 814--821.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Gasser, T., L. Sroka, and J. Mocks, The transfer of EOG activity into the EEG for eyes open and closed. Elecenceph. & Clin. Neurophys 61, 2 (1985), 181--193.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Hagemann, D. and E. Naumann, The effects of ocular artifacts on (lateralized) broadband power in the EEG. Clinical Neurophysiology 112, 2 (2001), 215--231.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. IJsselsteijn, W., Y. De Kort, and K. Poels, The Game Experience Questionnaire: Development of a self-report measure to assess the psychological impact of digital games. Manuscript in Prep (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Johnson, D. and J. Gardner, Personality, motivation and video games, OzCHI. (2010), ACM press. p. 276--279. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Johnson, D., et al., Personality, genre and videogame play experience, in Proc. Int. Conf. on Fun and Games. (2012), ACM press: Toulouse, France. p. 117--120. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Lim, S. and B. Reeves, Computer agents versus avatars: Responses to interactive game characters controlled by a computer or other player. IJHCS, 68, 1-2 (2010), 57--68. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Lucas, K. and J.L. Sherry, Sex Differences in Video Game Play: A Communication-Based Explanation. Communication Research 31, 5 (2004), 499--523.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Mandryk, R.L., M.S. Atkins, and K.M. Inkpen, A continuous and objective evaluation of emotional experience with interactive play environments, in Proc. CHI. (2006), ACM: Montreal, Quebec, Canada. p. 1027--1036. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Mandryk, R.L., K.M. Inkpen, and T.W. Calvert, Using psychophysiological techniques to measure user experience with entertainment technologies. Behaviour & Information Technology 25, 2 (2006), 141--158.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Mitchell, D.J., et al., Frontal-midline theta from the perspective of hippocampal "theta". Progress in Neurobiology 86, 3 (2008), 156--185.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Nacke, L.E., Wiimote vs. controller: electroencephalographic measurement of affective gameplay interaction, in Proc. Int. Conf. on the Future of Game Design and Technology. (2010), ACM: Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. p. 159--166. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Nacke, L.E., M.N. Grimshaw, and C.A. Lindley, More than a feeling: Measurement of sonic user experience and psychophysiology in a first-person shooter game. Interacting with Computers 22, 5 (2010), 336--343. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Nacke, L. E., Stellmach, S., & Lindley, C. A. Electroencephalographic Assessment of Player Experience: A Pilot Study in Affective Ludology. Simulation & Gaming, 42, 5 (2010), 632--655.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Olson, C.K., Children's motivations for video game play in the context of normal development. Review of General Psychology 14, 2 (2010), 180--187.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Pasch, M., et al., Movement-based sports video games: Investigating motivation and gaming experience. Entertainment Computing 1, 2 (2009), 49--61.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Przybylski, A.K., C.S. Rigby, and R.M. Ryan, A motivational model of video game engagement. Review of General Psychology 14, 2 (2010), 154--166.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Ravaja, N., et al., Phasic emotional reactions to video game events: a psychophysiological investigation. Media Psychology 8, (2006), 343--367.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Ravaja, N., et al., Spatial presence and emotions during video game playing: Does it matter with whom you play? Presence, 15, 4 (2006), 381--392. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Russoniello, C.V., K. O'Brien, and J.M. Parks, EEG, HRV and Psychological Correlates while Playing Bejeweled II: A Randomized Controlled Study. Studies in health technology and informatics 144, (2009), 18992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Ryan, R.M. and E.L. Deci, Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist 55, 1 (2000), 68--78.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Ryan, R.M., C.S. Rigby, and A.K. Przybylski, The Motivational Pull of Video Games: A Self-Determination Theory Approach. Motivation and Emotion 30, 4 (2006), 344--360.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Salminen, M., et al. Frontal EEG asymmetry in the study of player experiences during competitive and cooperative play. In Proc. of IADIS Int. Conf. Game and Entertainment Technologies (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Salminen, M. and N. Ravaja, Oscillatory brain responses evoked by video game events: The case of Super Monkey Ball 2. CyberPsy & Beh 10, 3 (2007), 330--338.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Sanei, S. and J.A. Chambers, EEG Signal Processing. 2008, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Schier, M.A., Changes in EEG alpha power during simulated driving: a demonstration. International Journal of Psychophysiology 37, (2000), 155--162.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Tabachnick, B.G. and L.S. Fidell, Using Multivariate Statistics. 5th ed. 2007, Boston: Pearson. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Vella, K., D. Johnson, and L. Hides. Positively playful: when videogames lead to player wellbeing. In Int. Conf. on Gameful Design, Research and Applications 2013, ACM (2013). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Weibel, D., et al., Playing online games against computer- vs. human-controlled opponents: Effects on presence, flow, and enjoyment. Computers in Human Behavior 24, 5 (2008), 2274--2291. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Yee, N., Motivations for Play in Online Games. CyberPsychology & Behavior 9, 6 (2006), 772--77Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Cooperative Game Play with Avatars and Agents: Differences in Brain Activity and the Experience of Play

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '15: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2015
      4290 pages
      ISBN:9781450331456
      DOI:10.1145/2702123

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 18 April 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '15 Paper Acceptance Rate486of2,120submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader