Betsy Anne Williams
ABSTRACT
Economic theory about peers can help learning scientists and designers scale their work from the scale of small classrooms to limitless learning experiences. I propose: 1. We may increase productivity in online learning by changing technologies around peers; many structures around peers can scale with class size. 2. It is not always in students' best interests to be good peers, and collective action failures may worsen with class size. I conducted an experiment in a NovoEd MOOC for teachers that was motivated by these propositions; it leads to future questions about unintended and emergent effects.
- Afuah, A. Are network effects really all about size? The role of structure and conduct. Strategic Management Journal 34 (2013), 257--273.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Agrawal, R., Golshan, B., and Terzi, E. Forming beneficial teams of students in massive online classes. In L@S, ACM Press (New York, New York, USA, 2014), 155--156. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bowen, W. G. The "Cost Disease" in Higher Education: Is Technology the Answer? Tech. Rep. October, The Tanner Lectures, Stanford University, 2012.Google Scholar
- Bowles, S. Towards an educational production function. In Education, income, and human capital, W. L. Hanson, Ed., vol. I. National Bureau of Economic Research, 1970, 9--70.Google Scholar
- Brooks, C., Teasley, S. D., Lonn, S., and Koo, E. Educational Discourse at Scale: Design Considerations to Support Discussions in Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) Environments. Innovation at Scale Workshop at CHI (2014).Google Scholar
- Cambre, J., Kulkarni, C., Bernstein, M. S., and Klemmer, S. R. Talkabout : Small-group Discussions in Massive Global Classes. In L@S 2014 (2014). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Duflo, E., Glennerster, R., and Kremer, M. Using randomization in development economics: A toolkit. Handbook of Development Economics 4, 07 (2008), 3895--3962.Google Scholar
- Goel, A., and Ronaghi, F. A Game-Theoretic Model of Attention in Social Networks. In Algorithms and Models for the Web Graph: WAW 2012, Springer Berlin Heidelberg (2012), 78--92. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Goetze, D. Comparing Prisoner's Dilemma, Commons Dilemma, and Public Goods Provision Designs in Laboratory Experiments. Journal of Conflict Resolution 38, 1 (Mar. 1994), 56--86.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Goldstein, J. Emergence as a Construct: History and Issues. Emergence 1, 1 (1999), 49--72.Google Scholar
- Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Rosé, C. P., and Levy, J. Fostering a Learning Community in MOOCs. In LAK Workshops (2014).Google Scholar
- Huang, J., Dasgupta, A., Ghosh, A., Manning, J., and Sanders, M. Superposter behavior in MOOC forums. In L@S '14, ACM Press (New York, New York, USA, 2014), 117--126. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Katz, M. L., and Shapiro, C. Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility. American Economic Review 75, 3 (1985), 424--440.Google Scholar
- Kizilcec, R. F., Piech, C., and Schneider, E. Deconstructing Disengagement: Analyzing Learner Subpopulations in Massive Open Online Courses. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2013), 170--179. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ledyard, J. Public Goods: A Survey of Experimental Research. In The Handbook of Experimental Economics, A. E. Roth and J. H. Kagel, Eds., vol. 85. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1995, 111--194.Google Scholar
- Lim, S., Coetzee, D., Hartmann, B., Fox, A., and Hearst, M. A. Initial experiences with small group discussions in MOOCs. In L@S '14, ACM Press (New York, New York, USA, 2014), 151--152. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mas-Colell, A., Whinston, M. D., and Green, J. R. Microeconomic Theory. Oxford University Press, New York, 1995.Google Scholar
- Miller, K., Zyto, S., Karger, D., and Mazur, E. Improving online class forums by seeding discussions and managing section size. In L@S, ACM Press (New York, New York, USA, 2014), 173--174. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rosé, C. P., Carlson, R., Yang, D., Wen, M., Resnick, L., Goldman, P., and Sherer, J. Social factors that contribute to attrition in MOOCs. In L@S, ACM Press (New York, New York, USA, 2014), 197--198. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rosson, M. B. Building Community within Large Groups of Online Learners. Innovation at Scale Workshop at CHI (2014).Google Scholar
- Salmon, G. E-moderating: the key to online teaching and learning, 3rd ed. Routledge, New York, 2011.Google Scholar
- Siemens, G., and Tittenberger, P. Handbook of Emerging Technologies for Learning. Tech. rep., University of Manitoba, Manitoba, 2009.Google Scholar
- Speck, J., Gualtieri, E., Naik, G., Nguyen, T., Cheung, K., Alexander, L., and Fenske, D. ForumDash: Analyzing Online Discussion Forums. In L@S (2014), 139--140. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Thille, C., and Smith, J. Learning Unbound: Disrupting the Baumol / Bowen Effect in Higher Education. In Forum Futures 2010 (2009), 31--38.Google Scholar
- Tinto, V. Student Success and the Building of Involving Educational Communities. 2003.Google Scholar
- Trumbore, A. Rules of Engagement: Strategies to Increase Online Engagement at Scale. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning 46, 4 (2014), 38--45.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Walker, E., Girotto, V., Zhang, C., Fernandez, A., Chen, G., and Hsieh, G. Understanding Peer Help in an Online Learning Community. In Innovation at Scale Workshop at CHI (2014).Google Scholar
- Winston, G. C. Subsidies , Hierarchy and Peers: The Awkward Economics of Higher Education. Journal of Economic Perspectives 13, 1 (1999), 13--36.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Peers in MOOCs: Lessons Based on the Education Production Function, Collective Action, and an Experiment
Recommendations
Using learning analytics to explore help-seeking learner profiles in MOOCs
LAK '17: Proceedings of the Seventh International Learning Analytics & Knowledge ConferenceIn online learning environments, learners are often required to be more autonomous in their approach to learning. In scaled online learning environments, like Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs), there are differences in the ability of learners to ...
Learning outside the classroom through MOOCs
The rapid increase use of information technologies throughout educational institutions is changing the way teachers and students learn, work, and establish collaboration. The learning cycle is an ongoing process that is designed to improve the quality ...
Retention in MOOCs: Understanding Users' Motivations, Perceptions and Activity Trajectories
CHI EA '15: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing SystemsMassive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) have experienced rapid development and achieved substantial attention from learners, educators and practitioners. Although MOOCs have been widely accepted, they have been plagued by tremendously high drop-out rate. ...
Comments