skip to main content
10.1145/2724660.2728691acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesl-at-sConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Work in Progress

The Visible and Invisible in a MOOC Discussion Forum

Published:14 March 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

Online discussion forums in a MOOC setting allow students to become aware of other students enrolled in the course. However, what is (usually) visible in the forums is the output of ``active'' students who engage in asking and answering questions. In addition to such active participants, there is (as always in online communities) a large group of ``passive'' users (so-called lurkers), who might find the forum useful to their learning, and read it regularly, despite remaining ``invisible''. Our analysis of a large MOOC online forum shows that for every active participant in the forum there are two passive ones. 30% of active participants complete the course, compared to only 6.6% of the passive participants. Vice-versa, 67% of students who complete the course are also active in the forum. However, ``invisible activity'' (e.g. reading or searching the forum) is something that both groups practice equally and more frequently, while only 3.3% of forum actions are visible.

References

  1. Alario-Hoyos, C., Pérez-Sanagustın, M., Kloos, C. D., G., H. A. P., Organero, M. M., and de-las Heras, A. R. Analysing the impact of built-in and external social tools in a mooc on educational technologies. In EC-TEL (2013).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Breslow, L., Pritchard, D. E., DeBoer, J., Stump, G. S., Ho, A. D., and Seaton, D. Studying learning in the worldwide classroom: Research into edx's first mooc. Research & Practice in Assessment 8 (2013), 13--25.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Kizilcec, R. F., Piech, C., and Schneider, E. Deconstructing disengagement: analyzing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses. In Proc. of the 3rd LAK, ACM (2013), 170--179. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Mustafaraj, E. What does enrollment in a mooc mean? In Proc. of the 1st ACM L@S, ACM (2014), 203--204. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Seaton, D. T., Bergner, Y., Chuang, I., Mitros, P., and Pritchard, D. E. Who does what in a massive open online course? Communications of the ACM 57, 4 (2014), 58--65. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. The Visible and Invisible in a MOOC Discussion Forum

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      L@S '15: Proceedings of the Second (2015) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale
      March 2015
      438 pages
      ISBN:9781450334112
      DOI:10.1145/2724660

      Copyright © 2015 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 14 March 2015

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Work in Progress

      Acceptance Rates

      L@S '15 Paper Acceptance Rate23of90submissions,26%Overall Acceptance Rate117of440submissions,27%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader