skip to main content
research-article

Technical Debt: Beyond Definition to Understanding Report on the Sixth International Workshop on Managing Technical Debt

Published: 03 April 2015 Publication History

Abstract

We report here on the Sixth International Workshop on Managing Technical Debt, collocated with the International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME 2014). The major themes of discussion this year indicate a growing maturity in this area of investigation and the desire to move beyond definitional issues to impact.

References

[1]
W. Cunningham. The WyCash Portfolio Management System. In OOPSLA'92 Experience Report (Vancouver, Canada, October 18-22, 1992). ACM, New York, NY, 29--30.
[2]
S. McConnell. Managing Technical Debt {Webinar}, Sep. 2011. Available from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lEKvzEyNtbk
[3]
I. Ozkaya, P. Kruchten, R. Nord, and N. Brown. Managing technical debt in software development. ACM Softw. Eng. Notes 36, 5 (2011), 33--35.
[4]
P. Kruchten, R. L. Nord, and I. Ozkaya. Technical debt: from metaphor to theory and practice. IEEE Software 29,6 (2012),18--21.
[5]
P. Kruchten, R. L. Nord, I. Ozkaya, and D. Falessi. Technical debt: towards a crisper definition; report on the 4th International Workshop on Managing Technical Debt. ACM Softw. Eng. Notes 38, 5 (2013), 51--54.
[6]
D. Falessi, P. Kruchten, R. L. Nord, and I. Ozkaya. Technical debt at the crossroads of research and practice: report on the 5th International Workshop on Managing Technical Debt. ACM Softw. Eng. Notes 39, 2 (2014), 31--33.
[7]
I. Griffith, D. Reimanis, C. Izurieta, Z. Codabux, A. Deo, and B. Williams. The correspondence between software quality models and technical debt estimation approaches. In Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Managing Technical Debt (Victoria, Canada, September 30, 2014). IEEE, Washington, DC, 19--26.
[8]
J. Holvitie, V. Leppänen, and S. Hyrynsalmi. Technical debt and the effect of agile software development practices on it: an industry practitioner survey. In Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Managing Technical Debt (Victoria, Canada, September 30, 2014). IEEE, Washington, DC, 35--42.
[9]
N. S. R. Alves, L. F. Ribeiro, V. Caires, T. S. Mendes, and R. O. Spínola. Towards an ontology of terms on technical debt. In Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Managing Technical Debt (Victoria, Canada, September 30, 2014). IEEE, Washington, DC, 1--7.
[10]
M. A. Al Mamun, C. Berger, and J. Hansson. Explicating, understanding, and managing technical debt from self-driving miniature car projects. In Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Managing Technical Debt (Victoria, Canada, September 30, 2014). IEEE, Washington, DC, 11--18.
[11]
T. T. Ho and G. Ruhe. When-to-release software product decisions in consideration of technical debt. In Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Managing Technical Debt (Victoria, Canada, September 30, 2014). IEEE, Washington, DC, 31--34.
[12]
L. Peters. Technical debt: the ultimate antipattern---the biggest costs may be hidden, widespread, and long term. In Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Managing Technical Debt (Victoria, Canada, September 30, 2014). IEEE, Washington, DC, 8--10.
[13]
M. F. Aniche, G. A. Oliva, and M. A. Gerosa. Are the methods in your data access objects (DAOs) in the right place? A preliminary study. In Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Managing Technical Debt (Victoria, Canada, September 30, 2014). IEEE, Washington, DC, 47--50.
[14]
V. Singh, W. Snipes, and N. A. Kraft. A framework for estimating interest on technical debt by monitoring developer activity related to code comprehension. In Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Managing Technical Debt (Victoria, Canada, September 30, 2014). IEEE, Washington, DC, 27--30.
[15]
J. H. Weber, A. Cleve, L. Meurice, and F. J. B. Ruiz. Managing technical debt in database schemas of critical software. In Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Managing Technical Debt (Victoria, Canada, September 30, 2014). IEEE, Washington, DC, 43--46.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Technical debt (TD) through the lens of TwitterJournal of Software: Evolution and Process10.1002/smr.254736:4Online publication date: 4-Mar-2023
  • (2021)Exploring Community Smells in Open-Source: An Automated ApproachIEEE Transactions on Software Engineering10.1109/TSE.2019.290149047:3(630-652)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2021
  • (2021)The human in model‐driven engineering loop: A case study on integrating handwritten code in model‐driven engineering repositoriesSoftware: Practice and Experience10.1002/spe.295751:6(1308-1321)Online publication date: 18-Feb-2021
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes
ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes  Volume 40, Issue 2
March 2015
125 pages
ISSN:0163-5948
DOI:10.1145/2735399
Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 03 April 2015
Published in SIGSOFT Volume 40, Issue 2

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. software economics
  2. software evolution
  3. software quality
  4. technical debt

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)5
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 08 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Technical debt (TD) through the lens of TwitterJournal of Software: Evolution and Process10.1002/smr.254736:4Online publication date: 4-Mar-2023
  • (2021)Exploring Community Smells in Open-Source: An Automated ApproachIEEE Transactions on Software Engineering10.1109/TSE.2019.290149047:3(630-652)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2021
  • (2021)The human in model‐driven engineering loop: A case study on integrating handwritten code in model‐driven engineering repositoriesSoftware: Practice and Experience10.1002/spe.295751:6(1308-1321)Online publication date: 18-Feb-2021
  • (2019)Design Rule Spaces: A New Model for Representing and Analyzing Software ArchitectureIEEE Transactions on Software Engineering10.1109/TSE.2018.279789945:7(657-682)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2019
  • (2018)The impact of design and UML modeling on codebase quality and sustainabilityProceedings of the 28th Annual International Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering10.5555/3291291.3291315(236-244)Online publication date: 29-Oct-2018
  • (2018)Cross-disciplinary and cross-life-cycle-phase Technical Debt in automated Production Systems: two industrial case studies and a surveyIFAC-PapersOnLine10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.42851:11(1192-1199)Online publication date: 2018
  • (2016)Understanding the impact of technical debt in coding and testingProceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Software Engineering Research and Industrial Practice10.1145/2897022.2897023(25-31)Online publication date: 14-May-2016
  • (2016)Technical DebtACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes10.1145/2894784.289480041:2(38-41)Online publication date: 11-May-2016
  • (2016)Examining the Impact of Self-Admitted Technical Debt on Software Quality2016 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution, and Reengineering (SANER)10.1109/SANER.2016.72(179-188)Online publication date: Mar-2016
  • (2016)How do software development teams manage technical debt? - An empirical studyJournal of Systems and Software10.1016/j.jss.2016.05.018120:C(195-218)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2016

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media