skip to main content
10.1145/2735711.2735787acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesahConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Vision enhancement: defocus correction via optical see-through head-mounted displays

Published:09 March 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

Vision is our primary, essential sense to perceive the real world. Human beings have been keen to enhance the limit of the eye function by inventing various vision devices such as corrective glasses, sunglasses, telescopes, and night vision goggles. Recently, Optical See-Through Head-Mounted Displays (OST-HMD) have penetrated in the commercial market. While the traditional devices have improved our vision by altering or replacing it, OST-HMDs can augment and mediate it. We believe that future OST-HMDs will dramatically improve our vision capability, combined with wearable sensing systems including image sensors.

For taking a step toward this future, this paper investigates Vision Enhancement (VE) techniques via OST-HMDs. We aim at correcting optical defects of human eyes, especially defocus, by overlaying a compensation image on the user's actual view so that the filter cancels the aberration. Our contributions are threefold. Firstly, we formulate our method by taking the optical relationships between OST-HMD and human eye into consideration. Secondly, we demonstrate the method in proof-of-concept experiments. Lastly and most importantly, we provide a thorough analysis of the results including limitations of the current system, potential research issues necessary for realizing practical VE systems, and possible solutions for the issues for future research.

References

  1. Amano, T., and Kato, H. Appearance control by projector camera feedback for visually impaired. In CVPRW, IEEE (2010), 57--63.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Asai, N., Matsuda, R., Watanabe, M., Takayama, H., Yamada, S., Mase, A., Shikida, M., Sato, K., Lebedev, M., and Akedo, J. Novel high resolution optical scanner actuated by aerosol deposited pzt films. In Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS), IEEE (2003), 247--250.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Avery, B., Sandor, C., and Thomas, B. H. Improving spatial perception for augmented reality x-ray vision. In VR (2009), 79--82.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Baričević, D., Lee, C., Turk, M., Höllerer, T., and Bowman, D. A. A hand-held ar magic lens with user-perspective rendering. In ISMAR (2012), 197--206. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Bennett, M., and Quigley, A. Creating personalized digital human models of perception for visual analytics. In User Modeling, Adaption and Personalization. Springer, 2011, 25--37. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Bimber, O., and Iwai, D. Superimposing dynamic range. In TOG, vol. 27 (2008), 150. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Bimber, O., Iwai, D., Wetzstein, G., and Grundhöfer, A. The visual computing of projector-camera systems. In Computer Graphics Forum, vol. 27, Wiley Online Library (2008), 2219--2245.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Broecker, M., Smith, R. T., and Thomas, B. H. Adaptive substrate for enhanced spatial augmented reality contrast and resolution. In ISMAR (2011), 251--252. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. David Hincapie-Ramos, J., Ivanchuk, L., Sridharan, S. K., and Irani, P. Smartcolor: Real-time color correction and contrast for optical see-through head-mounted displays. In ISMAR (2014), 187--194.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Fujimori, N., and Ando, S. Super-resolution reconstruction algorithm using vibro-imaging and correlation image sensor. In Society of Instrument and Control Engineers (SICE), Annual Conference on, IEEE (2012), 2028--2033.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Giusti, A., Taddei, P., Corani, G., Gambardella, L., Magli, C., and Gianaroli, L. Artificial defocus for displaying markers in microscopy z-stacks. In TVCG, vol. 17 (2011), 1757--1764. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Grimm, B., Goelz, S., Bille, J. F., et al. Objective measurement of wave aberrations of the human eye with the use of a hartmann-shack wave-front sensor. The Journal of the Optical Society of America A (JOSA A) 11, 7 (1994), 1949--1957.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Huang, F.-C., Wetzstein, G., Barsky, B. A., and Raskar, R. Computational light field display for correcting visual aberrations. In SIGGRAPH Posters (2013), 40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Hwang, A. D., and Peli, E. An augmented-reality edge enhancement application for google glass. Optometry & Vision Science 91, 8 (2014), 1021--1030.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Itoh, Y., and Klinker, G. Interaction-free calibration for optical see-through head-mounted displays based on 3d eye localization. In 3DUI (2014), 75--82.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Koizumi, N., Sugimoto, M., Nagaya, N., Inami, M., and Furukawa, M. Stop motion goggle: augmented visual perception by subtraction method using high speed liquid crystal. In AH (2012), 14. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Lombardo, M., and Lombardo, G. Wave aberration of human eyes and new descriptors of image optical quality and visual performance. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery (JCRS) 36, 2 (2010), 313--331.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Nitschke, C., Nakazawa, A., and Takemura, H. Corneal imaging revisited: An overview of corneal reflection analysis and applications. Information and Media Technologies 8, 2 (2013), 389--406.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Oskiper, T., Sizintsev, M., Branzoi, V., Samarasekera, S., and Kumar, R. Augmented reality binoculars. In ISMAR (Oct 2013), 219--228.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Oyamada, Y., and Saito, H. Defocus blur correcting projector-camera system. In Advanced Concepts for Intelligent Vision Systems, Springer (2008), 453--464. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Pamplona, V. F., Mohan, A., Oliveira, M. M., and Raskar, R. Netra: interactive display for estimating refractive errors and focal range. In TOG, vol. 29 (2010), 77. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Pamplona, V. F., Oliveira, M. M., Aliaga, D. G., and Raskar, R. Tailored displays to compensate for visual aberrations. In TOG, vol. 31 (2012), 81. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Peli, E. Vision multiplexing: an engineering approach to vision rehabilitation device development. Optometry & Vision Science 78, 5 (2001), 304--315.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Peli, E. Treating with spectacle lenses: a novel idea!? Optometry & Vision Science 79, 9 (2002), 569--580.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Platt, B. C., et al. History and principles of shack-hartmann wavefront sensing. Journal of Refractive Surgery 17, 5 (2001), S573--S577.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Sajadi, B., Gopi, M., and Majumder, A. Edge-guided resolution enhancement in projectors via optical pixel sharing. In TOG, vol. 31 (2012), 79. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Shimizu, S., and Fujiyoshi, H. Acquisition of 3d gaze information from eyeball movements using inside-out camera. In AH (2011), 6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Sridharan, S. K., Hincapié-Ramos, J. D., Flatla, D. R., and Irani, P. Color correction for optical see-through displays using display color profiles. In VRST (2013), 231--240. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Suryakumar, R., Meyers, J. P., Irving, E. L., and Bobier, W. R. Application of video-based technology for the simultaneous measurement of accommodation and vergence. Vision research 47, 2 (2007), 260--268.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Tomioka, M., Ikeda, S., and Sato, K. Approximated user-perspective rendering in tablet-based augmented reality. In ISMAR (2013), 21--28.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Westheimer, G. The maxwellian view. Vision research 6, 11 (1966), 669--682.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Vision enhancement: defocus correction via optical see-through head-mounted displays

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            AH '15: Proceedings of the 6th Augmented Human International Conference
            March 2015
            241 pages
            ISBN:9781450333498
            DOI:10.1145/2735711
            • General Chairs:
            • Suranga Nanayakkara,
            • Ellen Yi-Luen Do,
            • Program Chairs:
            • Jun Rekimoto,
            • Jochen Huber,
            • Bing-Yu Chen

            Copyright © 2015 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 9 March 2015

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate121of306submissions,40%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader